1 / 20

DPI ASW August 2014 Training

DPI ASW August 2014 Training. NC Professional Teaching Standards. Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students. Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.

ilana
Download Presentation

DPI ASW August 2014 Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DPI ASW August 2014 Training

  2. NC Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II:Teachers establish a respectfulenvironmentfor a diverse populationof students. Standard III:Teachers know the content they teach. Standard IV:Teachers facilitate learning for their students. Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice. Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.

  3. Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System Contribute to Academic Success 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice 3 Rating Categories 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

  4. Overview of Standard 6 6 End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests 6 Career Technical Education Assessment 6 NC Final Exams Contribute to Academic Success 6 K-3 Checkpoints 6 Analysis of Student Work

  5. Analysis of Student Work • In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in • Advanced Placement, • Arts Education, • Healthful Living, and • World Languages. • Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process. Contribute to Academic Success 6 Analysis of Student Work

  6. Principal’s Input Confirm Teacher Participation

  7. Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

  8. Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

  9. Class & Objective Selection Mid-late October Online Platform selects classes, and then teachers can choose objectives. Note: Teachers who are on a semester schedule will have classes selected for 1st semester and then later 2nd semester.

  10. Objective Selection • Objectives: • Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, the teacher will choose 5 objectives.

  11. 5 Timelapse Artifacts • Teacher decisions needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA): • A specific objective • Sample type • Individual Student • or • Whole Class • Collection Method • Samples from Point 1 and Point 2

  12. Sample Type • The Teacher may choose: • Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples • Collect and keep 2 work • samples: • for each class member • for a specific objective • at 2 separate points in time • OR

  13. Sample Type • The Teacher may choose: • Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples • 2 work samples that • represent the entire class • for a specificobjective • at 2 separate points in time

  14. 5 Timelapse Artifacts Late October - late May Teachers will compile student work samples.   Note: Teachers on a semester schedule will finish collecting 1st semester work samples by the end of December and will upload their artifacts to the Online Platform.  Then, they will repeat the class selection and objective choosing processes for 2nd semester classes.

  15. Student Selection & Upload Evidence Late May-early June Teachers with individual student work samples will have the Online Platform select 3 students at random for uploading.  Then, teachers will upload student artifacts and submit completed Evidence Collections to the Online Platform.)

  16. Effectiveness Status 3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6 An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own data for Standard 6 6 6 6 Standard Standard Standard Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

  17. Effectiveness Status Only for 2014 – 2017: Best 2 out of 3 years of data Mr. NC’s 3 years of growth data: 2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1) 2015-16 Meets (Year 2) + 2016-17 Meets (Year 3) Mr. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth Standard Standard Standard 6 6 6 Year 1 2014-2015 Does Not Meet Expected Growth Year 2 2015-2016 Meets Expected Growth Year 3 2016-2017Meets Expected Growth Contribute to Academic Success

  18. Lessons Learned from Pilots Activity Coming Soon! • Choose objectives carefully • Match teacher’s instruction and assessment • Select artifacts that demonstrate: • the objective selected • at 2 points in time • Realize not all objectives link easily to ASW process • Work together across content areas • Focus on performance-based assessment • Know your guidance chart and standards well

  19. Activity: Choosing Objectives for the ASW Process • These are some things to consider when selecting objectives: • Is this objective observable and measurable at two separate points in time? • How could the work samples for this objective be captured by a collection method at hand? • How well does this objective connect to how teachers teach and assess?

  20. ASW Process: A Quick Guide

More Related