1 / 115

Bureau Update: Part II Bambi J. Lockman, Chief Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Florida CASE Summer

Bureau Update: Part II Bambi J. Lockman, Chief Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Florida CASE Summer Leadership Institute June 12, 2007. Topics. Organizational Changes K-8 Virtual School (2006 Legislation) Florida’s IDEA Allocation Data Early Intervening Services

iram
Download Presentation

Bureau Update: Part II Bambi J. Lockman, Chief Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Florida CASE Summer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bureau Update: Part IIBambi J. Lockman, ChiefBureau of Exceptional Education and Student ServicesFlorida CASE Summer Leadership InstituteJune 12, 2007

  2. Topics • Organizational Changes • K-8 Virtual School (2006 Legislation) • Florida’s IDEA Allocation • Data • Early Intervening Services • LEA Determinations • 2% Regulations • Alternate Assessment

  3. Topics • SP&Ps • General Supervision and ESE Program Rules • Major Areas of Interest • Discretionary Projects • Parent Services • Third Party Cooperative Agreements • Calendar Events

  4. Organizational Changes

  5. BEESS….

  6. K-8 Virtual Schools and ESE(2006 Legislation)

  7. K-8 Virtual Schools • Established in s. 1002.415, F.S. during the 2006 Legislative Session • Maximum per student funding for 2007-08 is $5,050 • Total funds are not to exceed $9,500,000

  8. K-8 Virtual Schools • Enrollment is open to any K-8 student who meets at least one of the following criteria: • Spent the prior year in attendance at a public school in Florida and was reported for funding in both the October and February FTE surveys • Was enrolled in one of Florida’s approved K-8 programs the prior year • Is eligible to enroll in kindergarten or first grade • Has a sibling who is currently enrolled in one of Florida’s approved K-8 virtual programs and was enrolled at the end of the prior school year

  9. K-8 Virtual Schools and ESE • Students applying to participate in the K-8 virtual program who have disabilities that require ESE services, the K-8 virtual school should plan and conduct an IEP meeting in conjunction with the student’s school district in order to determine the level of services required • In coordination with the district, determine the K-8 virtual school’s ability to meet the students needs

  10. K-8 Virtual Schools and ESE • If the K-8 virtual school is able to provide the services, the student’s IEP should indicate that the virtual school will be responsible for providing the ESE services for that student within the $5,050 per student funding

  11. Florida’s IDEA Allocation

  12. Florida’s IDEA Allocation • On May 17, 2007, the U.S. Bureau of Census released state population estimates, by age, as of 7/1/06 (prior to that time the most recent estimates were as of July 1, 2005) • Florida’s state IDEA allocation is reduced from $590,587,175 to $590,329,496 (a reduction of $257,679) • Funds to states become available on July 1, 2007

  13. Data

  14. Students with Disabilities, 2006-07 Source: Survey 2, 2006-07

  15. Students with Disabilities Percent of Total Population Source: Survey 2, 2006-07

  16. Growth Rates, Students with Disabilities2000 through 2006

  17. NCLB Graduation Rate Source: Education Information and Accountability Systems

  18. Standard Diploma Rate, SWD Source: Survey 5, 2003-04 through 2005-06

  19. Dropout Rate Source: Survey 5, 2003-04 through 2005-06

  20. Postschool Outcomes

  21. Placement Settings, Ages 6-21 Source: Survey 9, 2004-05 and 2005-06; Survey 2, 2006-07.

  22. Placement Settings, Ages 3-5

  23. Discipline Risk Ratios • Risk (by race) of suspension/expulsion of greater than 10 days for SWD compared to nondisabled students • White: 1.01 • Black: 1.11 • Hispanic: 0.85 • Asian/Pacific Islander: 0.32 • American Indian/Alaskan Native: 1.12 Source: Survey 5, 2005-06

  24. Risk Ratios for Newly Placed Students • Risk that students of a given race will be newly identified as disabled when compared to students of all other races • White: 1.15 • Black: 0.90 • Hispanic: 0.95 • Asian/Pacific Islander: 0.61 • American Indian/Alaskan Native: 1.12 Source: Survey 5, 2005-06

  25. Risk Ratios for Placement Settings • Risk that students of a given race will be placed in specified settings when compared to students of all other races (All SWD) Regular Separate Other ClassClassSep. Env. • White: 1.15 0.69 0.77 • Black: 1.02 0.93 1.09 • Hispanic: 1.00 1.03 0.54 • Asian/Pacific Islander: 1.04 0.90 1.04 • American Indian/ Alaskan Native: 1.04 0.87 1.27 Source: Survey 2, October, 2006

  26. 2% Regulations

  27. 2% Regulations • Regulations were released on April 5 • These regulations allow states to develop modified academic achievement standards for a small group of SWD (up to 2% of all tested students can be reported as proficient against modified achievement standards for AYP purposes)

  28. Alternate Assessment

  29. Test Development • Florida has entered into a contract with Measured Progress, Inc. • Nonprofit company with extensive experience in alternate assessment since 1997

  30. Test Development • Revision of Sunshine State Standards • Access Points for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities • Independent • Supported • Participatory

  31. Test Development • 2007-2008 Assessment Cycle • Revised Reading/Language Arts Standards • Revised Mathematics Standards • Existing Science Standards • Standard 4 from the SSS/Special Diploma • 2008-2009 Assessment Cycle • Revised Science Standards

  32. Test Development • Assessments will contain primarily performance tasks • Selected response options • Open response options • Item development will follow the principles of universal design

  33. Test Design • One assessment covering 4 content areas • 24 items per content area for each grade level • Items reflect a progression from participatory to independent level • Every student starts at the participatory level

  34. Test Design - Reading • Two reading strands • Reading Process • Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension • Literary Analysis • Fiction and Nonfiction • At grades 9 and 10 will also develop items for Information and Media Literacy

  35. Test Design - Writing • Two writing strands • Writing Process • Writing Application • Narrative at grade 4, 8, and 10 • Expository and Persuasive at 8 and 10

  36. Test Design - Mathematics • Grades 3 through 8 • Three “Big Ideas” • Three “Supporting Ideas” • Grades 9 and 10 • 4 secondary Bodies of Knowledge • Preliminary - algebra, geometry, financial literacy, finite math (9), and statistics and probability (10)

  37. Test Design - Science • Standard 4, Uses systematic approaches when solving problems • Content driven by SSS areas

  38. Test Design • Administration • Teacher administration is scripted • All items will be read to students • Students will respond using their normal classroom communication modes • Objects are used for students at presymbolic level or as accommodations for sensory impaired students • Pictures are used both to supplement stimulus materials and for students to use for response

  39. Test Design • Scoring • All students start at participatory level • For each item: • Independent correct response at participatory level but incorrect response at supported level = 3 • Independent correct response at supported level but incorrect response at independent level = 6 • Independent correct response at independent level = 9

  40. Test Design • Scoring • Scaffolding at the participatory level • For each item: • Incorrect independent response at participatory level but a correct response after removal of one distractor = 2 • Incorrect response after removal of one distractor but correct response after removal of an additional distractor = 1

  41. Item Specifications • Single choice items will have at the most 3 options; recognizing examples of a given concept may have up to 6 options • Passages, word cards, and sentence strips will be read aloud • Word choices based on a variety of sources (i.e., Dolch word lists, etc.) and content review committee feedback

  42. Item Specifications • Simple content terminology in grades 3-5 and more accurate content terminology usage in grades 6-11 • Items should involve situations or contexts that can be expected to be familiar to most students and are age-appropriate • Most items should include necessary materials (i.e., picture cards, graphics, sentence strips); if objects are needed they should be readily available in classroom, be small enough to fit on desk and to remain stable

  43. Item Specifications • Participatory Access Points • Students may respond to items with the mode the student most commonly uses in the classroom to communicate • Materials provided for responses will be picture cards and number cards • The key and the two distracters will be clearly different from each other

  44. Item Specifications • Supported Access Points • Students may respond to items with the mode the student most commonly uses in the classroom to communicate • Materials provided for responses will be picture cards, word cards, sentence strips (with pictures) and number cards • At least two of the options, the key and one distractor, will relate to the item stimulus

  45. Item Specifications • Independent Access Points • Students may respond to items with the mode the student most commonly uses in the classroom to communicate • Materials provided for responses will be picture cards, word cards, sentence strips and number cards • All options, the key and the distractors, will relate to the item stimulus or it will be open response

More Related