1 / 21

A database of 1000+ Millward Brown BrandDynamics™ studies

BR A ND Z ™ THE WPP BRAND EQUITY STUDY. A database of 1000+ Millward Brown BrandDynamics™ studies. Covers 15,000+ of world's biggest and key local brands including product, corporate and service. 380,000+ consumers explicitly compare brands in 100+ categories. In 28 countries

jess
Download Presentation

A database of 1000+ Millward Brown BrandDynamics™ studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BRANDZ™ THE WPP BRAND EQUITY STUDY A database of 1000+ Millward Brown BrandDynamics™ studies

  2. Covers 15,000+ of world's biggest and key local brands including product, corporate and service 380,000+ consumers explicitly compare brands in 100+ categories In 28 countries from July 2001 Commissioned by WPP BRANDZ™ Benchmark your brand in your category - against 15,000 other brands on a number of different criteria Introduction to BRANDZ™

  3. 28 Countries Covered to date Denmark* Sweden Netherlands Belgium Poland Canada UK Czech Rep Germany France Switzerland Korea USA Greece Spain Japan Italy China Taiwan Mexico India Thailand Malaysia Brazil Chile Australia South Africa Argentina *New for 2001

  4. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence BrandDynamics™ Pyramid Can anything else beat it? What is it admired for? Is it satisfactory? Does it cater for me? Do I know about it?

  5. High share of wallet Why should we believe the BrandDynamics™ Pyramid? BrandDynamics™ Pyramid Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence Low share of wallet

  6. 50 20 17 16 12 Validation of the BrandDynamics™ Pyramid BrandDynamics™ Pyramid Share of Wallet Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  7. 16 19 26 33 Is the Size of the Brand the Only Thing That Matters? Brand A % Brand B % Bonding 11 4 Advantage 56 Performance 62 Relevance 73 95 Presence

  8. Brand Signature™ The BrandDynamics™ Pyramid represents the overall relationship of consumers with a brand But the Brand Signature™ actually identifies a brand’s strengthsand weaknesses relative to the other brands in the category

  9. Cars 2000 (UK) Rover Brand Signature Brand Pyramid Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  10. Brand Signatures™ • Fading Star • Still well known and relevant to a mass audience, but has lost appeal and has little product or image based advantage. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  11. Brand Signatures™ • Olympic Brand • Well known, well loved with a large core following. Talked about in everyday life and part of the cultural fabric of the country. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  12. Brand Signatures™ • Classic Brand • Well known, well loved with a relatively large core following. Good but not great. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  13. Brand Signatures™ Aspirational Brand Relatively well known but not a brand suitable for a mass audience - often too expensive for most. Would have difficulty in widening its franchise without alienating its core users. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  14. Brand Signatures™ Cult Brand • Not widely known and not for everyone - but has a committed • and fanatical following. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  15. Brand Signatures™ Little Tiger • Relatively unknown but with strong following amongst a core group. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  16. Brand Signatures™ • Defender A good balance between product performance and price - but no real product based or emotionally rooted advantages. Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  17. Brand Signatures™ Clean Slate brand Little known, irrelevant to most consumers and with few advantages Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence

  18. Brand Voltage™ … a one number summary of the Brand Signature™ Voltage™ =-4.9 | + - Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence Millward Brown International [drive:\directory path\filename.ppt\ 10 ]

  19. Brand Voltage™ … a one number summary of the Brand Signature™ Voltage™ =-4.9 0 +3.1 +9.3 STRONG AND WEAK PROFILES Weak Strong | + - | + - | + - | + - Bonding Advantage Performance Relevance Presence Millward Brown International [drive:\directory path\filename.ppt\ 10 ]

  20. +41% +16% -8% -16% -60% Low High Voltage < -6 -6 to -2 -2 to +2 +2 to +6 >+6 A Proven Link Between Brand Voltage And Market Share % Brands Gaining Share Minus % Losing Share 334 Brands

  21. Cult Aspirational Little Tiger Classic Defender Fading Star BRANDZ™ Map 15 10 Olympic 5 Voltage™ 0 Clean Slate -5 -10 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Presence

More Related