1 / 7

Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (with animations)

Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (with animations).

kalin
Download Presentation

Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (with animations)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (with animations) If a dense viscous layer rests on top of a less dense viscous layer, the lower layer will become unstable and form a Rayleigh Taylor instability. It will rise through the overburden in the form of diapirs. Examples are salt domes or magmatic diapirs. As example the figure shows a laboratory experiment by Hemin Koyi (1989, Dissertation, Uppsala) in which a light layer (PDMS,black) was overlain by a denser layer (bouncing putty). The faulted basement (plastillina) was camparably stiff. After centrifuging the buoyant layer becomes unstable and forms a series of diapirs. In the following animations of numerical experiments demonstrate the evolution of a Rayleigh-Taylor instability, and show how different viscosities and boundar conditions influence the style of the instability and the growth rates.

  2. Model set up Boundary condition: Free slip , no slip Density: 1 (kg/m3) Viscosity: 1 (Pa s) Gravity 1 (m/s2) h: 1 (m) Symmetric at the sides Perturbation 0.01 or 0.03 (m) 0.1 (m) Density: 0 (kg/m3) Viscosity: 0.01, 1, 100 (Pa s) Free slip , no slip

  3. A Definitions: Growth rate  describes the growth of a perturbation of initial amplitude A0: Characteristic wavelength char: A perturbation with this wavelenth is growing fastest Dominant wavelength: This wavelength dominates the final stage (often equal to the char. wavelenth, but sometime inherited from the initial wavelength)

  4. Case 1: Same viscosities Free slip Total run time: 4000 (s) char = 0.72 (m) No slip Total run time: 8000 (s) char = 0.36 (m)

  5. Case 2: Weak (0.01 Pa s) layer Free slip Total run time: 140 (s) char = 1.92 (m) No slip Total run time: 250 (s) char = 1.25 (m)

  6. Case 3: Strong (100 Pa s) layer Free slip Total run time: 10 000 (s) char = 1.1 (m) No slip Total run time: 30 000 (s) char = 0.30 (m)

  7. Initial wavelength Comparison of growth rates of the cases • Weak layers grow faster than strong layers • No slip boundary condition decreases the growth rate, especially for strong layers • Initial wavelengths develop as dominant wavelengths because of the strong initial amplitude or the braod maximum in case 3 (f.s.) • At later stages the characteristic wavelength becomes visible in the cases with very small char. Wavelengths (mostly no slip cases) Case 2 Case 1 Case 3

More Related