1 / 26

Systems Design Review

Systems Design Review. Rotor Cell Productivity Improvement Dresser-Rand Olean, NY January 18, 2013. Project Overview. Improve throughput in Rotor Cell 3 different deliverables/goals: Heat Treat Layout and Storage Balance and Over speed Storage

knox
Download Presentation

Systems Design Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Systems Design Review Rotor Cell Productivity Improvement Dresser-Rand Olean, NY January 18, 2013

  2. Project Overview • Improve throughput in Rotor Cell • 3 different deliverables/goals: • Heat Treat Layout and Storage • Balance and Over speed Storage • Lean Principles: Visual Status of WIP and Production • WIP prioritization • What do you want to know about a part on the floor?

  3. Heat Treat Specifications • Constraints • Fit within space: 10’x17’ • Accessible from over-head crane • Accommodate large impellers (80% < 24 inch) (20%>24 inch) • Accommodate high volumes (20-30 impellers) • Load Rated 2,000 lbs per shelf • Goal • Reduce foot print • Utilize vertical space • Storage space for 20-30 impellers • Flexibility in layout for future expansion

  4. Racking Alternative Analysis Keeping Ergonomics in mind, height would be limited to 4 ½ ft

  5. Variations Approximately $3,000 -$5,000 per Rack depending on size and style.

  6. Heat Treat Risk Assessment

  7. Heat Treat Layout Alternatives

  8. Layout One

  9. Layout Two

  10. Layout Three

  11. Layout Four

  12. Layout Five

  13. Layout Six

  14. Layout Seven

  15. Balance and Over Speed

  16. Balance and Over Speed Specifications • Constraints • Accommodate varying balance plate sizes • Fit within current space 12’ x 20’ • Maintain organization methodology (by size) • Make large plates accessible to over-head crane • Space for future plate storage (+10%) • Goals • Implement 5S in design • Reduce foot print • Improve Lay-out • Layout flexibility for future growth

  17. Balance and Over Speed Risk Assessment

  18. Potential Designs: Minimal Action • Add more shelves to current design. • Layout: • Reposition shelving so shelves are back-to-back • Or Reduce down aisle width • Pro: • Minimal cost • Con: • Visibility/Reaching Parts • Flexibility with layout is constrained by single sided access

  19. Potential Designs: Shelving Tree • Layout: • Modular Shelving Units • Could be arranged in multiple configurations. • Pro: • Accessible from all sides • Easy to relocate • Fits in tight, non-traditional spaces • Reduce down aisle width • Con: • Stability Risk • 5S: Sustaining organization B&OS Pit

  20. Potential Designs: Shelving Tree 2 • Layout: • Modular Shelving Units • Could be arranged in multiple ways. • Pro: • Accessible from all sides • Easy to relocate • Fits in tight, non-traditional spaces • Reduce down aisle width • Con: • Stability Risk • 5S: Sustaining organization

  21. Potential Designs: Vegetable Rack • Layout: Modular Design • Larger Foot-print • Possibly more centrally located • Pros: • High Parts Density • CAD model shows≈108 plates per shelf (6 in. Diameter) • Vertically Stored • 5S: Missing parts are easily identified • Cons: • More parts = Greater Load Rating • Non-mobility Higher Cost (Although Fewer Racks would be needed)

  22. Potential Designs: Vertical Library Stand • Layout: Modular Design • Tighter Footprint • Pros: • High Parts Density • Similar in total storage Density to Vegetable Rack • 5S: Missing parts are easily identified • Shelving bins: size ranges- ascending • Less Leverage on Shelves • Possible adjustable shelf height • Cons: • Accommodating Variable Part Sizes

  23. Visual Lean

  24. Visual Lean • Two Possible Goals: • Make the floor look neat and organized • Queuing lanes, Signage, 5S and/or • Implement self managed Inventory Flow • Reduce searching times • Reduce meetings • No communication necessary

  25. Visual Lean • What does management want to know about a part on the floor? • Where is that part going next? • Where is the part in the process? • What machines can a part be run on? • Is the part late or on time? • When is the part due? • Establish priority rules based on the parts status • Operator’s Perspective • What part am I doing next? • What am I running today? tomorrow? • How long of a queue exists at a machine? • Establish specific queuing locations for a machine

  26. Moving Forward • Detailed design review in 4 weeks Heat Treat • Integrate design into new layout • Procurement Procedures for Dresser-Rand B & OS • Design Requirements for Dresser-Rand • Full Implementation Plan Lean (MSDII) • Initiate Information gathering now • Possibly multiple Kaizen events next quarter

More Related