1 / 34

Comments on Levy’s

Comments on Levy’s. “Health Insurance among Low-Skilled Adults over the Business Cycle” Rucker Johnson Univ of California, Berkeley Prepared for NPC “Working & Poor” Research Conference June 9-10, 2005. Why Care about Loss of Health Insurance? (A little perspective on the paper).

lajos
Download Presentation

Comments on Levy’s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comments on Levy’s “Health Insurance among Low-Skilled Adults over the Business Cycle” Rucker Johnson Univ of California, Berkeley Prepared for NPC “Working & Poor” Research Conference June 9-10, 2005

  2. Why Care about Loss of Health Insurance?(A little perspective on the paper) • Some lose employer-sponsored HI & join public HI-- adds to budget strain • Uninsured may get less med treatment (Doyle 2001) • Uninsured may impose costs due to inefficient care mgmt (ER care was preventable if treated @ ofc visit) • Economic security & risk of bankruptcy in event of negative health shock

  3. Despite strong economic growth, and expanding public coverage, the rate of health insurance coverage fell during the 1990s. • 13.7% of non-elderly uninsured (1987) • 15.8% of non-elderly uninsured (2000) • Puzzle: Low-skilled had largest gains in employment and largest declines in HI • Goal of Levy paper: Explain decline in HI coverage among less-skilled in booming ’90s • Approach: Use CPS (’90-’03), relate HI coverage trends in late ’90s boom, and ’01 downturn to changes in income and employment by educ/gender– • How much can be explained? • Was decline driven by changes in public or private coverage?

  4. Factors that Affect HI Coverage • Labor market conditions • Much of cyclical var in coverage related to change in economic conditions (Cawley & Simon, 2005) • Health care costs-- rising premiums • 1% increase in premium  drop of 300,000 (Lewin) • Much of secular trend in HI coverage due to higher health care costs (Chernew, Cutler, Keenan, 2002) • Availability of public coverage • Medicaid/SCHIP expansions (Currie & Gruber, 1996) • Structural changes of economy • Explain little of change in HI coverage over time (Glied & Stabile, 2000; Acs, 1995) • Demographic changes • Changing value of alternatives (charity care) • Regulatory changes • Changing Load • Taxes

  5. What about Changing Distribution of Coverage? • Decline not evenly distributed, concentrated among low-income adults • Prior research examines either effects of costs or economic conditions; • But rarely both or distributional effects across groups • How does effect of macroeconomy on HI coverage differ for men, women, & children, by education and race? • To what extent does public HI coverage compensate for secular and cyclical changes in private coverage, by gender, education, and race?

  6. Overview of Trends in HI Coverage: 1990-2003

  7. Econometric Specification • Identifying sources of variation: • Exploit time and state variation in economic conditions Model: • P(HI)= B1 * (state unemp rate) + B2 * (own emp) + B3* (spouse emp) + B4 * (fam income) + B5 * (demographic vars) + B6 * (Medicaid generosity) + (year dummies) + (state dummies) Where HI = different health insurance outcomes

  8. Main Concerns about Paper • Incomplete Characterization/Accounting of Health Insurance Dynamics over period • Decomposition Analysis—issues of interpretation

  9. Issues of Measurement that Raise Concern w/Analysis • Limitations of CPS • Records whether covered by HI at any time in last 12 mos • Cannot use CPS to determine HI coverage in specific month matched w/macroeconomic cond’ns for that month • Multiple changes in survey question over time • captured by year FE • Use of cross-sectional data • Inability to remove unobserved time-invariant person-specific heterogeneity • Longitudinal data reveal much larger share of pop at risk for being uninsured • Short (‘04), using SIPP, finds ½ of persistently uninsured are missed in svys that count only those uninsur for 12 consecutive months

  10. Some Unresolved Issues • Does paper decompose relative roles of economic conditions, health care costs, Medicaid/SCHIP expansions, employment status, for health insurance coverage trends among low-skilled adults? • Does paper adequately acc’t for competing explanations over this time period? • Does paper help us to understand where risks of future gaps in coverage are likely to be greatest?

  11. Decomposition Analysis: Trends in HI Coverage, 1990-2003 Total change can be decomposed as: Portion of Δs in HI not explained by Δs in X: “residual” effect Portion of Δs b/w yrs due to Δs in X • Cannot decompose residual component–- state dummies included • State*yr dummies capture Δs in economic conditions, health care costs, public program generosity • Sensitivity of decomposition estimates to inclusion of state unemp rate and proxy for state HI costs? • Relate time profile of residual effect with known trends of other factors that may have driven Δs in HI

  12. Source: Brady & Lin, 2005

  13. Source: Brady & Lin, 2005

  14. Source: Brady & Lin, 2005

  15. Health Insurance is Dynamic • Half of uninsured spells end within 5-6 months (Short, 2004) • Number uninsured partof a yearnumber uninsured all year • As many people lose or gain coverage as remain uninsured • Considerable turnover in uninsured population • Timing matters in counting, characterizing, and covering the uninsured

  16. Analyzing HI Dynamics using PSID(1997-2003) Nationally-representative sample Health Insurance Info • Individuals asked: • # of mos w/HI coverage in each yr b/w 1997-2002 • Type of coverage in each yr b/w 1997-2002 • HI premium costs • Total HH medical care costs • Out-of-pocket costs (hospital, Dr.office, Rx drugs) • Health status measures

  17. Merged State-Level Data,1997-2002 Special thanks to John Cawley and Kosali Simon for sharing their state-level data for 1997-2002.

  18. Merged data on: • SCHIP/Medicaid Eligibility • Computed from running detailed simulation programs (created by Cawley and Simon) on March CPS respondents as in Cutler and Gruber (1996) • Take all March CPS children in 1996, and calculate the weighted fraction of them that would be eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP in a particular state in a particular year. That fraction is used as measure of Medicaid/SCHIP generosity. The measure varies by state and year.

  19. Empirical Approach (using PSID)(similar to Cawley & Simon, ’05) • Separate models for men, women, children, by education (interactions w/race)—restrict to non-elderly • Estimate models w/dependent vars: • Whether employer-sponsored HI full yr • Whether uninsured all yr • Govt-sponsored HI at any time (2-yr period) • Medical care expenditures (2-yr period) • Explanatory var of interest: • State unemp rate • Include individual-specific & yr-specific fixed effects • State-level controls for Medicaid generosity, HI costs, % unionized • Identification of effect of macroeconomic conditions on probability of HI coverage comes from variation w/in people over time in deviations from nat’l mean in that yr.

  20. Less-Educated Men (Especially Minorities) Have High Uninsured RatesPSID: #of Months w/Any HI,1997-2002 HS Dropouts

  21. Less-Educated Men (Especially Minorities) Have High Uninsured RatesPSID: #of Months w/ESI,1997-2002 HS Dropouts

  22. Less-Educated Women (Especially Minorities) Have High Uninsured RatesPSID: #of Months w/Any HI,1997-2002 HS Dropouts

  23. Less-Educated Women (Especially Minorities) Have High Uninsured RatesPSID: #of Months w/ESI,1997-2002 HS Dropouts

  24. Less-Educated AdultsPSID: % with ESI Full Yr,1997-2002 HS Dropouts

  25. Less-Educated WomenPSID: % with Govt HI (at any time),1997-2002 HS Dropouts

  26. TABLE 1. PSID men, HS dropout; whether HI as a fn of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients(Robust std errors)

  27. TABLE 1. PSID men, HS dropout; whether HI as a function of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

  28. TABLE 1. PSID men, HS dropout; whether HI as a function of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

  29. TABLE 2. PSID Women, HS dropout; whether HI as a fn of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

  30. TABLE 2. PSID Women, HS dropout; whether HI as a fn of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

  31. TABLE 2. PSID Women, HS dropout; whether HI as a fn of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

  32. TABLE 3. PSID Children of HS dropout; whether HI as a fn of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

  33. TABLE 3. PSID Children of HS dropout; whether HI as a fn of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

  34. TABLE 3. PSID Children of HS dropout; whether HI as a fn of macroeconomic conditions Linear probability model coefficients (Robust std errors)

More Related