1 / 2

Some questions to be asked

Some questions to be asked. Was there a specific objective for the evaluation – also to be found in the Terms of Reference (ToR)? Were the ToR attached to the evaluation? Were the qualifications of the evaluators explicitly stated? Were there OVIs (Objectively Verifiable Indicators)?

laken
Download Presentation

Some questions to be asked

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Somequestions to be asked • Was there a specific objective for the evaluation – also to be found in the Terms of Reference (ToR)? • Were the ToR attached to the evaluation? • Were the qualifications of the evaluators explicitly stated? • Were there OVIs (Objectively Verifiable Indicators)? • Were there any specific references to Guidelines, Manuals, Methods in the ToR and in the Evaluation itself

  2. Cont’d • Is it clear from the document when, where and by whom the evaluation was made? • Was a base-line study needed? If so, was it carried out? • Has poverty alleviation explicitly been dealt with (over arching objective of the GoM)? • Have other cross-cutting issues been adequately dealt with? (Environment, gender, HIV/AIDS, good governance) • Has the issue of cost-effectiveness been dealt with? Is there any discussion of costs and benefits in the evaluation?

More Related