1 / 20

Blogging as an ethnographic tool to study PhD development

Blogging as an ethnographic tool to study PhD development. Some thoughts and questions. A brief description. A group of candidates at the University of Sydney (including me) are keeping weblogs on their process The blogs are behind a firewall and not open to the world at large

langer
Download Presentation

Blogging as an ethnographic tool to study PhD development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Blogging as an ethnographic tool to study PhD development Some thoughts and questions

  2. A brief description • A group of candidates at the University of Sydney (including me) are keeping weblogs on their process • The blogs are behind a firewall and not open to the world at large • We can post unpublished entries that are saved but not read by the others • We are also reading each other’s blogs and commenting on them Mary-Helen Ward

  3. Mary-Helen Ward

  4. Mary-Helen Ward

  5. Mary-Helen Ward

  6. Mary-Helen Ward

  7. What does a PhD blog look like? • My public PhD blog http://manainkblog.typepad.com/faultlines/ • Paul’s blog http://teusner.org/2006/11/13/nexus-analysis/#comments • Kevin’s blog http://theory.isthereason.com/ • Jean’s blog http://creativitymachine.net/ • Sarah’s blog http://e-mentoringresearch.blogspot.com/ Mary-Helen Ward

  8. How is the PhD conceptualised? Project reading the literature doing the research PhD!!!!! ‘writing up’ Product (thesis) marking Mary-Helen Ward

  9. What else could usefully be examined? Project Process PhD!!!!! Product (thesis) Mary-Helen Ward

  10. What has been investigated? • What does the process mean to • the candidate? (Lee & Green, 1999; Johnson, Lee & Green, 2000) • the supervisor? (Pearson & Brew, 2002) • the university? (Neumann, 2004; McWilliam, 202) Mary-Helen Ward

  11. What I want to know is… • To what extent can blogging help support candidates in the process of development that characterises the PhD? Mary-Helen Ward

  12. Struggling with ethnographic methodology • Is my study naturalistic or interpretive? • How can I fairly represent my participants? • “… ethnography inscribes the human crises of a specific culture. It endeavors to connect those crises to the public sphere, to the apparatuses of the culture that commodify the personal, turning it into a political, public spectacle.” (Denzin, 1999, p.512) Mary-Helen Ward

  13. Moving ethnography online • Is the internet a cultural artefact or does it constitute a culture? • What are the implications of doing an ethnography among people you may never see or hear? • What does it mean to join or leave a community when you’re never really ‘there’? • It’s the ethnography you do by the seat of your pants… Mary-Helen Ward

  14. Why blog?  to update others on activities and whereabouts  to express opinions to influence others  to seek others’ opinions and feedback  to “think by writing” • to release emotional tension (Nardi, Schiano & Gumbrecht, 2004, p4) Mary-Helen Ward

  15. Why use blogs? • They are always everywhere available – literally true with the introduction of moblogging  PhD candidates already familiar with the internet as a source of information, communication, and perhaps also support and organization  Participants retain control of their blog – it won't disappear at the end of a 60-minute interview.  Blogging emphasises the idea of PhD as process rather than project. Mary-Helen Ward

  16. Additionally… • Blog as cyberdesk • Capacity to express personality in setup, colours, pictures etc • Blogging has “…the capacity to engage people in collaborative activity, knowledge sharing, reflection and debate, where complex and expensive technology has failed” (Williams & Jacobs, 2004, p232). Mary-Helen Ward

  17. Postgraduate pedagogies? • Development of autonomous scholar (Johnston, Lee & Green, 2002) • Related to the basis of online pedagogy? Community of practice? (Boud & Lee, 2005) Mary-Helen Ward

  18. Some final questions • What stories (and counter-stories) need to be told? • What spaces are there for different practices and voices in post-graduate contexts, including research in and for postgraduate studies and pedagogy? (Johnston, Lee & Green, 2000, p146) Mary-Helen Ward

  19. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 501-516. Denzin, N. K. (1999). Interpretive ethnography for the next century. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(5), 510-519. Forte, M. C. (2005). Centring the links: Understanding cybernetic patterns of Co-production, Circulation and Comsumption. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods. Oxford: Berg. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE. Johnson, L., Lee, A., & Green, W. (2000). The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 135-147. Lee, A., & Williams, C. (1999). 'Forged in Fire': Narratives of trauma in PhD supervision pedagogy. Southern Review, 32(1), 6-26. McWilliam, E., Singh, P., & Taylor, P. (2002). Doctoral education, danger and risk management. Higher education research and development, 21(2), 119-129. Nardi, B., Schiano, D. J., & Gumbrecht, M. (2004). Blogging as social activity, or would you let 900 million people read your diary? Paper presented at the ACM Conference of Computer-supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, Illinois. Neumann, R. (2003). The Doctoral Education Experience: Diversity and Complexity (Commonwealth Funded Report). Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135-150. Mary-Helen Ward

More Related