1 / 12

WP9:Dissemination

WP9:Dissemination. Strong publication record Modest media exposure Invited talks to specialist audiences Low key Web presence Aim to ramp up by end of year 2. Publications. 22 papers (6 journal, 17 conference, 9 workshop)

loe
Download Presentation

WP9:Dissemination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP9:Dissemination • Strong publication record • Modest media exposure • Invited talks to specialist audiences • Low key Web presence • Aim to ramp up by end of year 2

  2. Publications • 22 papers (6 journal, 17 conference, 9 workshop) • Some in the top rank (one at AAMAS, two at IJCAI, stop press…WWW07) • Rejections occurred when we tried to base papers on general idea (“vision fatigue”). • Strongly technical papers were effective. • Lots of papers were integrative.

  3. Deliverables as Publications

  4. Related Projects Being Proposed • TRAP (Trust, Rationality and Adversarial Planning) Barcelona-Edinburgh • KCDE (Managing the Scientific Knowledge Lifecycle) Barcelona-Trento • Cancer Research UK involvement • Autonomous Systems IRC (UK consortium) • Biomedical projects being drafted in China

  5. Web Presence • Currently www.openk.org is simply “holding point” for public documents (Wiki provides a window on current work). • In coming year will be the route into: • OpenKnowledge kernel • Interaction models • Tutorial material • Test results • Wiki will also get more use in coming year

  6. WP10:Management • Ahead on kernel integration (testbed integration next) • Lower than average cost+effort this year (expected) • High proportion of inter-site research • Already substantial assets to manage • Maturing is the big challenge for next year

  7. Inter-site Integration • Kernel programmers group (all sites) • LCC tutorial • Bi-lateral visits • Co-authored papers in WPs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 • Skype Sessions • Wiki

  8. External Advisors • Jim Hendler • Ricardo Baeza-Yates (Director Yahoo non-US research labs) • Juan Pablo Albar (director of ProteoRed) • Alistair Duke (BT)

  9. Project Map Amsterdam Barcelona Edinburgh KMI Southampton Trento Lorenzo Xueping 6.2 (Service cluster) Siu-wai Spyros Juan Antonio Antonis Pablo Sri Joaquin Bioinf services 1.2 (Interaction protocol) Carles D2.2 (Router) Frank Dietlind Marco Sindhu Vanessa Jordi Ronny Paolo Adrian 4.7 (Trust model) Jaume 8.1 (SW browser) routing LCC OK kernel Testing Guide Lucia Marta Enrico Dave R 9.1 (Manual) o mapping visual 8.1 (QA system) Nardine 7.1 (Test rig) Liang Madalina Uladzimir Pavel Bo Dave D 5.1 (Markup lang) e-Resp services 4.4 (GEA methodology) Mikalai Austin Paul Fausto Alan Tim Nigel 3.3/4/5 (Composite mapping) Maurizio Fiona Annette Lorenzo 6.6 (Service cluster)

  10. Distribution of Cost and Effort • Overall, ¼ budget and ¼ effort used (similar across sites). • Across workpackages: • WP1 Interaction modelling: Less than expected (allocate to kernel). • WP2 Semantic routing: Pro rata to time. • WP3 Dynamic ontology mapping: Higher spend but foundational for WP4. • WP4 Semantic quality of service: Effort borrowed from here for kernel. • WP5 Markup and multimedia:Clever solution saved time, but markup work ahead. • WP6 Testbeds: Right proportion but potential sink of effort. • WP7 Empirical studies: Much work done off-budget. • WP8 User-centred applications: Pro rata to time. • WP9 Dissemination: Starts now.

  11. Milestones • M1.1 : Interaction protocol running on examples from WP6 (month 12) Reached for bio, soon for e-response • M1.2 : Paper on interaction language and architecture (month 18) Reached • M2.1 : Example, using simulator, of semantic routing applied to bioinformatics scenarios of D6.1 (month 12) Will reach by month 18 • M3.1 : Example of ontology mapping applied to testbed scenarios of WP6 (month 12) Reached partially (but will develop further) • M4.1 : Example of semantic quality of service components applied to the two testbeds in WP6 (month 12) Will reach by month 18 • M6.1 : Repository of twenty significantly complex, representative, bioinformatics scenarios in sub-domains of the testbed areas (month 6) Reached • M6.2 : Working bioinformatics and emergency interaction models (month 12)Reached • M7.1 : Test rig operational (month 12) Reached • M9.1 : Project-specific service area on-line (month 12) Reached (but will develop further)

  12. 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 T1.1 Definition of interaction model language T1.2 Basic peer-to-peer coordination protocol T1.3 Development of plug-in components T1.4 Plug-in integration T2.1 Interface to semantic routing algorithm 1.1 1.2 2.1 T2.2 Design semantic routing algorithm T2.3 Build interaction model router T2.4 Build semantic discovery component T3.1 Definition of ontological framework T3.2 Benchmark ontology mappings 2.2 3.1 T3.3 Build ontology mapping engine T4.1 Query-answering processing T4.2 Good enough answers T4.3 Trust and reputation T5.1 Define visualisation markup language 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 T5.2 Build visualisation markup tools T6.1 Identifying bioinformatics domains T6.2 Build bioinformatics interaction models T6.3 Develop bioinformatics case studies T6.4 Identifying e-rescue domains 6.1 6.2 6.3 T6.5 Build e-rescue interaction models T6.6 Develop e-rescue case studies T7.1 Build a test rig T7.2 Empirical testing of components T7.3 Engineering case studies 7.1 7.2 8.1 T8.1 Semantic browsing T8.2 Ontology based query answering T9.1 Generic service area T9.2 Bioinformatics service area T9.3 E-Rescue service area 8.2 9.1 9.2 Timing 12 1 Ahead (integrated with kernel) 2 Ahead (integrated with kernel) 3 Theory ahead (evaluation next) 4 On schedule (early days) 5 On schedule (integration next) 6 On schedule (integration next) 7 On schedule (integration next) 8 On schedule (integration next) 9 Starting now

More Related