1 / 72

AAEC 4305: Agricultural Policy

AAEC 4305: Agricultural Policy. Fall 2007 Dr. Don Ethridge. Course sections. Review of key economic concepts Intro. to policy U.S. historical background U.S. commodity policy Policy in a global setting Food policy. Key economic concepts for ag. policy. Market Market demand

Download Presentation

AAEC 4305: Agricultural Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AAEC 4305: Agricultural Policy Fall 2007 Dr. Don Ethridge

  2. Course sections • Review of key economic concepts • Intro. to policy • U.S. historical background • U.S. commodity policy • Policy in a global setting • Food policy

  3. Key economic concepts for ag. policy • Market • Market demand • Elasticities • Relationship to incomes/expenditures • Market supply • Market equilibrium • Producer and consumer surplus

  4. Definitions • Market—all buyers and sellers of a defined good in a defined time and space. • Market demand—relationship between quantity of a good that buyers will purchase per unit of time and the alternative prices of that good, other things constant.

  5. Definitions (cont.) • Market supply—the relationship between the quantity of a good per unit of time that sellers will sell at alternative prices, other things constant. • Market equilibrium—the market condition at which all of the good offered for sale is bought.

  6. Definitions (cont.) • Consumer (producer) surplus—the benefit obtained by consumers (producers) from being able to purchase (sell) all units of a good at the market price instead of having to pay (accept) the maximum (minimum) price for each unit bought (offered).

  7. The “Magic” of Markets • No coercion. Markets operate based on individual optimizing decisions. There is no authority that forces individuals to make specific production or consumption decisions. • As an “unmanaged” system, it is, in fact, the most efficient system of large-scale organization ever conceived.

  8. Efficiency • Markets tend to create economic efficiency. • Use A producers should be able to acquire the resources by outbidding use B and C producers. • So markets will tend to allocate resources to their highest valued use. • But what if prices do not accurately indicate consumer valuations of various goods and services?

  9. “Market failure” • This leads to a situation referred to as market failure, which is a justification of interference with markets (through policy). • We will return to this issue after reviewing some key theories.

  10. Producer and Consumer Surplus in a Functioning Market S Pareto Optimal allocation – You can’t make anyone better off without making someone else worse off. P* D Q*

  11. Example of govt. intervention-price floor Supply Domestic Price Floor A B C Producers gain A, B, and C P* Consumers lose A, and B Demand Qd Q* Qs

  12. Cost to Taxpayers if Surplus Dumped S Domestic Price Floor Ps A B C If government can dump surplus it will recover I and J D P* H E G F Pw Price of Surplus dumped on World Market D I J Qd Q* Qs

  13. Intro. to policy • Definitions and classifications • Forces affecting agricultural policy • Reasons to study policy • Policy goals • Role of economics

  14. Policy—a guiding principle leading to a course of action (programs) that is pursued by a government • Economic policy—pursued in management of national economic affairs • Agricultural policy—sectoral economic, natural rescource, and social policy

  15. Forces affecting agricultural policy • Inherent instability • Golbalization • Technology • Food safety • Environmental concerns • Industry structure/industrialization • Politics/political system • Individual events

  16. Why study policy? • No country has been willing to risk its basic necessities to free markets • All countries interfere with markets • All countries are affected by their own policies and policies of other countries

  17. Policy problems • Price & income instability • Political instability • Poverty • Food safety • “Market failures” Note: Problems often eminate from industry structure.

  18. Two Broad Categories Of Justification of Government Market Intervention • Market Failure • For some reason markets fail to work • Economics has a lot to say about when and why • Redistributional • Policy makers want to redistribute wealth • Economics has relatively little to say

  19. Causes of Market Failure • Common property (non-excludable) goods. • “Unfair” market power. • Asymmetric information. • Externalities.

  20. Non-excludable goods • Inherently can’t be exclusively consumed or defined as a common good. • National defense • Ocean fishing grounds • Government Responses. • Public provision • Regulate use of the common good • Provide incentives to encourage cooperative use

  21. Unfair Market Power • Monopoly, Monopsony, Cartels • Government responses • Trust busting (anti-trust law) • Regulation • Facilitate equalization of market power • Cooperatives • Take over natural monopolies • Public utilities • Roads

  22. Asymmetric Information • Market fails because of uncertainty: • Uncertain about characteristics of other party’s product (used cars) or behavior (unmonitored workers slacking) or about future events (weather) • Government responses • Mandatory price reporting • Mandatory livestock price reporting • Collects and disseminates information • USDA market reporting • Market grading • Fills the missing market • Crop insurance

  23. Externality • The effect of one decision maker on another that is outside the market — market prices do not reflect full costs or benefits. • pollution that results from some production process. • Government responses • Taxes • Subsidies • Regulations

  24. Agriculture/food sector policy goals • Market stability • Food security, safety, & health • Sustainability • International competitiveness

  25. How economists contribute • Analyze policies and programs • Educate and provide advice

  26. The policy process • 3 main groups in the U.S. • Diverse interests; many misperceptions • History of changing interests

  27. Influence groups • Agricultural producer groups • Agribusiness organizations • Food nutrition & safety groups • Environmental & conservation groups • Political parties • Executive & congressional branches • Foreign countries & global organizations

  28. Perceptions and Reality • Image: Due to economic hardships, farmers are becoming an endangered species. Who will produce our food? • Reality: The average income of U.S. farmers is well above that of the population as a whole. While the number of farmers declines, agricultural production continues to increase.

  29. Image: Farming is environmentally benign and a naturally healthy occupation. • Reality: Farming is a principal source of environmental (particularly water) pollution and one of the most dangerous occupations in the U.S.

  30. Image: Agriculture is a domestic industry that is highly dependent on domestic policy. • Reality: U.S. agriculture is an export industry highly dependent upon foreign markets and international economic forces.

  31. Image: Agriculture is homogeneous and is the principal source of income in “farm states” • Reality: Agriculture is extremely diverse (agricultural interests are largely crop and region specific) and fewer than 12 percent of rural families receive the majority of their income from farming.

  32. Image: U.S. Agriculture is made up of small family farms and exists in idealistic rural settings. • Realty: Fewer and larger farms.

  33. Four broad historical periods of U.S. agricultural policy Pre-1930s • Building the infrastructure 1930 to mid-1960s • Depression & war years • Price supports and storage Mid-1960s to mid-1990s --Coupled direct payments Mid-1990s to present --Decoupled direct payments

  34. Policy prior to the 1930s • General economic development—transportation (rail, roads, canals), postal (rural mail), Homestead Act (1862) • Institution building—USDA (1862), Land Grant Colleges (1862), Hatch Exp. Sta. (1887, 1890), Fed. Land Banks (1916), Coops (1922), PCAs (1933), etc. • Regulatory development—ICC (1887), Sherman Antiturst (1890), FDA (1906), meat inspection (1907), grain standards (1916), Pack. & Stockyards (1921), Commodity Exc. Auth. (1922)

  35. Then came the 1930s • Great Depression for general economy, but 1920s for agriculture • Ag. Characteristics enabled assistance • Inherently unstable • Immobile resources • Farmers price takers • Rapid tech. change & productivity inc. • Low income & price elasticities Had rationale & means to assist farmers

  36. 1930s-1960s progression • Ag. Marketing Act of 1929—1st “Farm Bill”; revolving fund to buy surplus & raise prices; failed because money went quickly. • AAA of 1933—price supports for reducing acres in wheat, cotton, corn, hogs, rice, tobacco, milk; financed by excise tax on processors.

  37. Soil Conservation & Domestic Allotment Act of 1936—income parity instead of price parity goal; funding through Congress instead of processors; shift acreage to “soil conserving” crops. • AAA of 1938—reenacted provisions of 1936 act; created fed. crop ins.; initiated non-recourse loans. • WWII—strong demand & high prices; Congress raised support prices (didn’t cost much)

  38. Post World War II acts • Extended high price supports based on parity concept • Maintained rigid acreage allotments • Agricultural Act of 1948 (90% of parity) • Agricultural Act of 1949 (“permanent” law) • Agricultural Act of 1954 • Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954 (PL-480) • Agricultural Act of 1956 (Soil Bank) • Agricultural Acts of 1958, 1962, and 1964

  39. 1960s-1990s progression • After WWI, accumulated large government surpluses with high Treasury costs. No good way to get rid of stocks. • “Slippage.” Producers lobbied to keep acreage reductions to a minimum, took out least productive acres, and applied more inputs to remaining acres. • Potential for higher consumer prices.

  40. “Globalization” began • Flex. exchange rates • Trade negotiations • World “food crisis” (1973-76) • Surpluses disappeared (high prices) • Unstable markets

  41. 1965-1996 programs • Food and Agriculture Act of 1965 was a major shift in structure of programs (first to use direct payments) • Program structures stayed stable until 1996; minor exceptions were • Act of 1973 (target prices and deficiency payments. TP based on COP). • Act of 1977 (raised price and income supports; allowed removal of acreage controls) • Act of 1985 (reduced loan rates to allow markets to clear; “marketing loan” introduced to avoid stockpiles; CRP; Sodbuster & Swampbuster provisions) • Act of 1990 (planting flexibility; organic food standards) • Through all the acts until 1996, increasing % produced for free market by limiting eligible acres and yields

  42. 1996-present • 1996-”freedom to farm”—decoupled income support payments (historical base; could shift land among program crops); deficiency payments, based on target prices, eliminated. • More recognition of global market • Direct income support decoupled from production • Land use restrictions relaxed • Act of 2002 brought countercyclical payments (reintroduction of TP & mktg. loan concept)

  43. Some consequences of ag policies over time • Benefits largely capitalized into asset values • Reduced U.S. competitiveness in world markets • Fostered protectionist border policies • Distorted resource prices and use • Led to overinvestment in agriculture • Fostered some structural changes, retarded others • Reduced risks, supported tech revolution • Temporarily improved farmer incomes

  44. Trends in ag support policies: 1970s to date • Less market distorting and more market-oriented • Less restrictive on producers • More trade oriented • More environmentally and consumer friendly • Very expensive; $15-25 billion/year • Less popular public support

  45. Major components of U.S. commodity policy tools • Price supports • Production controls • Direct payments • Trade protection • Subsidized crop insurance

  46. Price supports • Create surpluses • Handling of resulting surpluses • Government purchase • Non-recourse loan

  47. Production controls • Acreage allotments, payments for idling land, marketing quotas • Have tended to reduce surpluses, but not eliminate them

  48. Direct payments • Target prices have been the vehicle in US programs • Marketing loan has been a means of moving surpluses

  49. Subsidized crop insurance • Commercial crop insurance has not been widely used in major crops • Subsidized crop insurance intended as a replacement for disaster relief • Effect has been to reduce risk, increase farm income stability, and increase commodity supply (through risk reduction)

More Related