1 / 39

9. Electromagnetic Forces

9. Electromagnetic Forces. 9A. Electric Forces. The Scalar Potential. In E&M, electric fields produce a force F = q E In quantum mechanics, we always work with the potential Assume no magnetic field. Can we write electric field in terms of potential? Faraday’s Law: If B = 0, then:

Download Presentation

9. Electromagnetic Forces

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 9. Electromagnetic Forces 9A. Electric Forces The Scalar Potential • In E&M, electric fields produce a force F = qE • In quantum mechanics, we always work with the potential • Assume no magnetic field. Can we write electric field in terms of potential? • Faraday’s Law: • If B = 0, then: • Anything with zero curl can be written as a gradient: • U is the electrostatic potential or scalar potential • Then the potential energy will be qU(r,t) • Hamiltonian for electrons: • For other particles, e –q

  2. Is the Scalar Potential Unique? • Can two scalar potentialsproduce the same electric field? • The difference must be independent of position: • Why write it this way? We’ll see soon • The problem: Schrödinger’s equation willhave different solutions for different U’s • Of course, if U' – U is a constant, this is just a shift in energy, and we know how to deal with that: • This suggests:

  3. Gauge Transformations With Only E-fields • Assert: if  is a solution of Schrödinger’s equation with potential U, then ' is a solution with potential U' • Note, for particles other than electrons,gauge transformation for charge q is

  4. 9B. Electromagnetic Forces The Vector Potential • Classically, the force on a charge is given by: • Not obvious how to write this in terms of a potential • Is there something akin to the electrostatic potential we can use to write the magnetic field? • Gauss’s law for magnetic fields: • Anything with zero divergence can be written as a curl • A(r,t) is called the vector potential • Faraday’s Law • Anything with zero curl can be written as a gradient

  5. Are the Vector and Scalar Potentials Unique? • Can two vector potentialsproduce the same magnetic field? • Anything with vanishing curlcan be written as a gradient • We also need to matchthe electric field • So we must have • For the wave function, it makes sense tomake the same guess as before

  6. Gauge Transformations • The three transformation at right collectivelydescribe a gauge transformation • They lead to identical electric and magnetic fields • Choosing exactly which A and U to use iscalled a gauge choice • Classically, it doesn’t matter which one you pick – they are physically equivalent • Sort of like picking an origin • We would expect Schrödinger’s equation – whatever it is – to be unchanged as well Goal: Find a Schrödinger’s equation that: • Is unchanged when we perform a gauge transformation • Physically leads to forces like:

  7. Sample Problem A region of space contains no electric field and a constant magnetic field B0 in the z-direction. Find three different vector fields A that could describe this magnetic field, find a gauge transformation relating two of them, and describe the types of problems each of the three would be most useful for. • The fields are: • Seems like a good idea to makeU = 0 and A independent of time • To get Bz, write out curl: • First solution: Let Ax= 0, then • Second solution: Let Ay = 0, then • Third solution: Average them

  8. Sample Problem (2) …, find a gauge transformation relating two of them, and describe the types of problems each of the three would be most useful for. • Let’s try to find a gauge transformationrelating 1 and 2 What are each of these useful for? • Solution 1 is independent of y • Useful for problems independent of y • Solution 2 is independent of x • Useful for problems independent of x • Solution 3 – plot it: • Useful for rotationally symmetric problems

  9. Kinematic Momentum • We want Schrödinger’s equation to be invariant under gaugetransformations • How about the equationwe already have? • Turns out it doesn’t work • Problem: We would like to have expressions like • What do we actually have? • It looks like we wish we had P + eA instead of P • Define the kinematic momentum  as • As always, e – q for other particles • Then we see that:

  10. Schrödinger’s Equation Revisited • Let’s guess the following Schrödinger’s equation: • Assert, if true for , then true for ’ • First note that: • Similarly: • We therefore have: • Hamiltonian is:

  11. 9C. Working With Kinematic Momentum Sample Problem Which of the expectation values Pand is gauge invariant? • Recall that: • No for Pandyes for

  12. Kinematic vs. Conventional Momentum • Note that any measurement must be independent of gauge • Therefore, P must be unmeasurable, but  might be measureable • How would one measure momentum? • One way: measure velocity (change in position over time) and multiply by mass • It will be necessary to revisit Ehrenfest’s theorem • These were derived from • But we assumed we had a Hamiltonian of • But our Hamiltonian is now

  13. Commutation Relations • Recall: • Also recall: • We now need to find commutators of  and R • To understand this, consider aspecific component, say

  14. Ehrenfest’s Theorem Revisited: Position • For any operator: • We therefore have: • Generalize the formula: • Conclusion: Velocity times mass is kinematic momentum

  15. Ehrenfest’s Theorem Revisited: Momentum (1) • For kinematic momentum we have

  16. Ehrenfest’s Theorem Revisited: Momentum (2) • Electric field is: • The sum is a cross product: consider i = z • Now generalize

  17. Ehrenfest’s Theorem Discussion • First equation tells you  is like momentum, p = mv • In second equation, what does this mean classically? • This is exactly what we’d expect • Strong indication that we guessed the right Hamiltonian • However, for particles with spin, we actually missed something

  18. 9D. Magnetic Dipole Moments Why They Should Exist • Think of an elementary particle as a spinning ball of charge q and angular momentum S • Electric current is flowing the same direction it is spinning • It should act like a little dipole magnet • Naïve model then predicts dipole moment: • This model is naïve, but dimensionally correct • For electron, simple Dirac model predicts g = 2 • Experiment yields • For protons, a similar formula applies: • Proton not elementary: gp = 5.5856957 • Even the neutron has a dipole moment • Withgn = –3.826085

  19. Schrödinger’s Equation Re-Revisited • A magnetic dipole in a magnetic field likes to align with the magnetic field • This implies there is an energy associated with it • This implies a new term in the Hamiltonian • Commonly approximate g = 2 for electron • Schrödinger’sequation: Is it still gauge invariant? • The old Schrödinger equation was gauge invariant • The new one just contains B, which is gauge invariant • So new expression is also gauge invariant

  20. Stern-Gerlach Experiment • Suppose you put a particle in a region with a magnetic field • Presence of magnetic field causes a contribution to the potential energy • If the magnetic field is notuniform, this will produce a force • By creating a non-uniform magnetic field, we can effectively measure the spin • This is the Stern-Gerlach experiment

  21. 9E. Simple Problems with Magnetic Fields The Procedure How do we solve problems with EM fields? • Step one: Find A and U • Because of gauge invariance,you typically have many choices for A and U • Choose one that is compatible with other symmetries of the problem • Step two: Write the Hamiltonian • Step three: Find as many operatorsA1, A2, A3as possible that commute with the Hamiltonian and each other • Write your eigenstates as states with eigenvalues under all the other operators • Step four: In Schrödinger’s equation, replace as manyterms as possible with corresponding eigenvalues • Solve the remaining problem

  22. Landau Levels What are the energy levels of an electron in a uniform magnetic field ? • Step One: we need A and U • We set U = 0, then we foundthree solutions to these equations • I like the first one: it’s positive and less complicated • Step two: Now substitute it into the Hamiltonian: • Step three: Find operators that commute with H: • Write your states as eigenstates of these:

  23. Landau Levels (2) • Step four: In Schrödinger’s equation, replace as manyterms as possible with corresponding eigenvalues • Solve the remaining problem • Where: • This is a shifted harmonic oscillator with energy

  24. Landau Levels (3) • Now put it all together • First term is motion along magnetic field • The n term is cyclotron motion • The ms term is precession in the magnetic fields • Note that changing ms by one almost cancels changing n by one • Small frequency difference – can be measured experimentally very well

  25. Hydrogen Atom in Strong Magnetic Field Put a proton in a strong magnetic field, then add one electron Assume magnetic field is constant (on the scale of the atom) • Electric and magnetic fields are • Need to find U and A: • How about: • Which of the following is best for B? • U has rotational symmetry, not translational, so choose A3 • The Hamiltonian is now:

  26. Hydrogen Atom in Strong Magnetic Field (2) • Let’s look at the size of the B2 term: • Atoms are around 10-10 m in size, and magnetic fields are rarely more than a few Tesla • This term is tiny – let’s ignore it • When we say strong magnetic field, we don’t mean too strong, say B < 104 T • Recall that: • So we have

  27. Hydrogen Atom in Strong Magnetic Field (3) • The first two terms are the unperturbed hydrogen atom • We know states and energies • These states are also eigenstates of the last two terms • States with the same ml and ms get split in presence of magnetic fields • That’s why these letters are called m – magnetic quantum numbers

  28. Why a Strong Magnetic Field? • It seems like we never assumed a strong magnetic field • There are actually additional small terms in the Hamiltonian • Spin-orbit coupling • This means the basis vectors we chose are not eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, even in the absence of magnetic field • But our equations are still okay if the magnetic field is strong enough • This is called the Paschen-Back effect

  29. Sample Problem An electron is in a constant electric field and magnetic field as given at right. Find eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, their energy, and their velocity. • We need to find the scalar and vector potentials • Let’s try • Which one for the vector field? • Since U depends on only x, pick A1 • Our Hamiltonian is now: • This commutes with • Eigenstates are • So we have • Rearrange it a little…

  30. Sample Problem (2) • H' is some sort of shifted harmonic oscillator • Complete the square Perfect square

  31. Sample Problem (3) • This is a harmonic oscillator, shifted in space, and with shifted energy • Standard harmonic oscillator: For all states: • But ours is centered at x0, so • For our states,

  32. Sample Problem (4) An electron is in a constant electric field and magnetic field as given at right. Find eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, their energy, and their velocity. • Recall: Classical force:

  33. 9F. The Aharanov-Bohm Effect Can We See the Vector Potential Itself? • If the magnetic field vanishes, we can choose A = 0, right? • Q: If particles move through a region with B = 0, can we ignore A? • A: If the region is simply connected, then you can prove this is true • Consider an ideal solenoid with current flowing as sketched at right • Consider the integral of A around the black dashed curve • Use Stokes’ theorem • You can only make A = 0 everywhere around a loop if there is no magnetic flux through it • This allows us to conjecture a very interesting situation

  34. Double Slit Experiment Without a Magnet • Let the initial wave at the first slit be 0 • Part of it follows the upper path • Another part follows the lower path • The total wave is then • Interference fringes

  35. Double Slit Experiment With a Magnet Now adda magnet • We can choose gauge AIsuch that AI = 0 on upper path • We can choose gauge AII such that AII = 0 on lower path • These cannot be the same gauge, but theymust be related by a gauge transformation • We can add a constant to  so (0) = 0 (this makes 0 the same in both gauges) • Consider the following integral:

  36. Double Slit Experiment With a Magnet (2) • Write both final waves in gauge I • Recall: • Therefore: • Hence we have:

  37. Discussion of Aharanov-Bohm • Shift in phase can be detected • Even though the particle didn’t move through region of magnetic field! • The shift is undetectable if:

  38. Magnetic Monopoles • A magnetic monopole is a north pole without a south pole • It would have magnetic field: • Can we find a vector potential A that makes this work? • But wait – Doesn’t this rule preclude monopoles? • Note that A is infinite and discontinuous at  =  • The magnetic flux is actually coming in at  =  • But this is infinitely thin, not classically detectable • Like an infinitely thin solenoid, of “string”

  39. Magnetic Monopole Quantization • That “string” is invisible classically • But, suppose we send electrons around the string to do Aharanov-Bohm • Presence of string detectable by shift in interference • Unless: • Prediction: if magnetic monopoles exist, their magnetic charge comes in multiples of h/e • This is in fact the typical monopole charge in extensions of the standard model, like Grand Unified Theories • Magnetic monopoles have never been detected

More Related