1 / 7

Competition law & policy, economic growth & development: Australia & Indonesia

Competition law & policy, economic growth & development: Australia & Indonesia. A Brief Discussion Rafaelita M. Aldaba, PIDS 15 November 2011 Bali, Indonesia. Australia & Indonesia: competition gains. Very different countries: stage of development, institutions, history, culture

mikasi
Download Presentation

Competition law & policy, economic growth & development: Australia & Indonesia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Competition law & policy, economic growth & development: Australia & Indonesia A Brief Discussion Rafaelita M. Aldaba, PIDS 15 November 2011 Bali, Indonesia

  2. Australia & Indonesia: competition gains • Very different countries: stage of development, institutions, history, culture • ACCC: relatively long history of competition law; KPPUin its nascent stage; objective is to enhance national welfare & efficiency • Benefits from competition law & policy esp. reduced prices for utilities & basic commodities • Australia: efficiency gains: 2.5% of GDP or $20B/year • Indonesia: consumer savings from reduced prices of basic commodities & mobile telecommunications • Australia: evolving nature of competition law & policy in response to business behavior & economy

  3. Debate on merits of competition law continues: main arguments • Missing markets: financial markets, investments can only be financed by retained profits, eroded by unfettered competition • Achieve a certain size to compete in world markets: implications for conduct of reviews of mergers • No need for government to promote rivalry in markets where innovation is principal source of competition; monopoly profits are incentives for firms to innovate • Maximizing rivalry leads to inefficient outcomes in natural monopolies & some network industries • Philippines, no comprehensive competition law, same arguments raised by skeptics

  4. Philippines: a study in contrast • Shallow, hollow, & lagging growth; failed to create jobs • Gross domestic investment has been low & declining from 25% in ‘97 to 14% in ‘09 • Phils 16.5% (average) lagged behind Indonesia 25%, Malaysia 22%, Thailand 26% VN 36% • Phils 1.4% & Indonesia 0.52% lagging, Malaysia & Thailand 3%, Cambodia 4.7%, Viet Nam 5.5%

  5. Why has the Philippines lagged in attracting investment? • Weak institutional & regulatory mechanisms • Poor infrastructure • Weak competition • Weak competitiveness of Philippine industries, low productivity, & low trade gains (exports as % of GDP rose 82% in ‘90s to 97% in ‘00s; imports 44% to 50%; unfavorable trade balance )

  6. Competition issues in vital industries: rising prices, high cost & low quality services • First country in Asia to enact competition law (1925); not effectively implemented; since 1980s attempts to legislate • Cement cartel: controlled by the world’s big 3, prices continued to rise even during the GFC, government eliminated tariffs in ‘08-’09 but to no avail • Interconnection issues • Merger took place, duopoly • Strengthened incumbent’s market dominance • High entry barriers: congressional franchise, 40% foreign equity limit • Merger can endanger competition & welfare improvement arising from the deal

  7. Other competition problems & major lessons from Australia & Indonesia • Shipping cartel & inefficient ports: lack of regulatory independence & credibility; uses its power to protect its own ports against competition from privately-owned ports (conflict of interest) • Low quality of service, high logistics & shipping costs affecting competitiveness: one of the longest duration & high cost for port & terminal handling in Asia (exports: 3 days/$270; Indonesia: 2 days/$165 ) • Australia & Indonesia: greater competition leads to welfare gains & benefits • Philippines: weak competition has led to poor economic performance, lack of investments, low competitiveness • Done quite a lot of liberalization but not efficient institutions/regulatory • Liberalization & shift to more open economy requires changes in legislations & policies, building efficient institutions & good infrastructure to support reforms, generate supply side responses & reap gains in terms of employment & growth

More Related