1 / 14

Fuzzy Inference Systems for Brain-Computer Interfaces: a preliminary study

COST B27 ENOC Joint WGs Meeting Swansea UK, 16-18 September 2006. Fuzzy Inference Systems for Brain-Computer Interfaces: a preliminary study. Fabien Lotte IRISA, Rennes, France. Introduction. Identification of “brain activity patterns” achieved using various classifiers

mio
Download Presentation

Fuzzy Inference Systems for Brain-Computer Interfaces: a preliminary study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COST B27 ENOC Joint WGs Meeting Swansea UK, 16-18 September 2006 Fuzzy Inference Systems for Brain-Computer Interfaces: a preliminary study Fabien Lotte IRISA, Rennes, France COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  2. Introduction • Identification of “brain activity patterns” achieved using various classifiers • Neural Networks • SVM… • Fuzzy logic based classifiers scarcely used • Fuzzy Inference Systems (FIS) not used for BCI despite they are • Universal approximators [Wang92] • Readable and extensible [Chiu97] • Suitable for biomedical signals classification [Chan00][Bay03] ► Study of FIS for EEG-based BCI COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  3. Outline • FIS algorithm • Motor Imagery classification using FIS • Evaluation of FIS • Conclusion COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  4. FIS algorithm • A FIS is • a set of fuzzy “if-then” rules • FIS algorithm considered: Chiu’s algorithm [Chiu97] • Robust to noise • Generally more accurate than Neural Networks • Principle • Learning the rules • Classification using the fuzzy “if-then” rules COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  5. O O O O O O Learning (1) • Clustering of the data of each class separately (substractive clustering) 3 X1 1 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 X X X X X2 COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  6. O O O O O O Learning (2a) Gaussian fuzzy membership function • fuzzy rules generation 3 X1 1 X X A31 X X X X X X X X X 2 X X X X X2 A32 COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  7. O O O O O O Learning (2b) • fuzzy rules generation 3 X1 1 X X A31 X X X X X If X1 is A31and X2 is A32 Then Class is O X X X X 2 X X X X X2 A32 COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  8. O O O O O O Classification • Classification of an unseen vector B 3 If X1 is A11 and X2 is A12Then Class is X A11(X1) * A12(X2) = 0.8 * 0.2 = 0 .16 If X1 is A21 and X2 is A22Then Class is X A21(X1) * A22(X2) =0.01 * 0.9 = 0.009 If X1 is A31 and X2 is A32Then Class is O A31(X1) * A32(X2) = 0.1 * 0.01 = 0.001 X1 1 X X A31 X X A11 X X X B X X X X A21 2 X X X X X2 A12 A22 A32 B belongs toX COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  9. Classification of motor imageryusing Fuzzy Inference System • EEG Data Used [Vidaurre04][Leeb04] • Source • Data set IIIb of the BCI competition III (Graz) • Protocol • Imagination of left and right hand movements (2 classes) • Recordings • 2 electrodes: C3 and C4 • Signals band pass filtered between 0.5 and 30 Hz • 3 subjects COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  10. Feature Extraction • Band Power (BP) features employed • Advantages • Efficient, low dimensional, understandable • Drawback • The most reactive frequency bands need to be identified • Reactive frequency bands identification • Statistical paired t-test for each 2 Hz frequency band • Reactive frequencies obtained: α and β (18-28 Hz) bands • Feature vector obtained [C3α, C3β, C4α, C4β] COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  11. FIS for Motor Imagery • Fuzzy Rules learnt for subject 1 • Contralateral Event Related Desynchronisation (ERD) observed COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  12. Evaluation • Comparison with classifiers widely used for BCI • A MultiLayer Perceptron (MLP) • A Gaussian Support Vector Machine (SVM) • A Linear Classifier (LC) COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  13. Conclusion • Exploration of Fuzzy Inference Systems for BCI systems • Motor imagery data • FIS were shown to be • More accurate than a Linear Classifier • As accurate as Neural Networks or SVM • Readable • FIS are suitable and useful for BCI design • Integration of this work in the Open-ViBE project (France télécom, INRIA, INSERM, AFM) • www.irisa.fr/siames/OpenViBE COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

  14. Questions ? Fabien Lottefabien.lotte@irisa.fr COST B27 meeting, Swansea, 2006

More Related