1 / 8

Social Networks: Agent-based Modelling and Social Network Analysis with PAJEK

Social Networks: Agent-based Modelling and Social Network Analysis with PAJEK. Richard Taylor¹ and Gindo Tampubolon² ¹Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University ²Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester.

more
Download Presentation

Social Networks: Agent-based Modelling and Social Network Analysis with PAJEK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Networks:Agent-based Modelling and Social Network Analysis with PAJEK Richard Taylor¹ and Gindo Tampubolon² ¹Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University ²Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester ESRC Research Methods Festival, Oxford, 17th-20th July 2006, & Oxford Spring School, Dept. of Politics and International Relations

  2. Methodology of ABM • Objectives: • Characterisation of possible outcomes rather than prediction • Understanding of processes that lead to outcomes • Steps • Problem formulation: observations, hypotheses, theory • Abstraction to create conceptual model (expressed as equations, set theory notation, or precise description) • ABM implementation • Design of experiments (parameter choices, batch sizes) • … continued

  3. Methodology of ABM (2) • Steps • Analysis of results. Verification of implementation • Comparison of simulation outcomes with observations and/or with analytical solutions • Validation step - cross validation on both the micro-behaviours and the macro outcomes / signatures • (steps are iterated) • Additional steps: • Model docking and different grains of analysis • Dissemination in sufficient reproducible detail

  4. When using real networks as inputs to an ABM • Do network structural dynamics seem important or not? • Are there any longitudinal data on how networks evolve? • Are there any findings/descriptions of how they evolve?

  5. When using simulation-generated networks • Are they emerging from some sociologically-founded process? • Use with care random / regular / small-world / scale-free graphs which although convenient may not be appropriate models • What are the appropriate measures by which generated networks could be analysed?

  6. When using networks and grids • Spatial grids are commonly used because for many types of interaction, spatial location is important • Grid models are relatively easy to set up • Network models can also be placed on a grid • Consider, • Is there sufficient justification for doing so? • What additional complexity is thus generated?

  7. Discussion point Typically we ask: What network types emerge from different social processes? Based on generative ABM, similarly we might ask: How do existing networks constrain social processes?

  8. PAJEK vs. UCINET • Similarities and differences between PAJEK and UCINET: • UCINET is free-to-try whereas PAJEK is free • UCINET is an older project, more widely used and better integrated with other software • Both software are supposed to import and export both file types (but I have found this doesn’t work) • DRAW / NETDRAW are plug-ins for these packages that do network visualisations via several layout algorithms

More Related