1 / 7

Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director

Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director. Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies – Bruce King Indicator System – Norman Webb Case Studies of Institutions of Higher Education – Susan Millar.

naiara
Download Presentation

Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Research and Evaluation Team Lines of WorkAndy Porter, Director • Building a Partnership – Susan Millar • District Case Studies – William Clune • Targeted Studies – Bruce King • Indicator System – Norman Webb • Case Studies of Institutions of Higher Education – Susan Millar

  2. Middle School Science Immersion ImplementationGrade 6 Plate Tectonics Eric Osthoff

  3. SCALE Goal 2 • Develop and implement immersion stem learning experiences to ensure that every student in our partner districts experiences the process of engagement in an extended (e.g., four-week) scientific investigation at least once a year

  4. Data Collection • Observation of the professional development summer institutes and follow-up professional development • Pre-test/post-test results on teacher content knowledge • Pre-test/post-test on content of classroom instruction • Observations of classroom implementation • Two group quasi-experiment on student achievement • Gains on district period assessment • Student work samples of challenging tasks • State reading and mathematics assessments as baseline controls • School and districts supports for and barriers to immersion teaching and learning

  5. Table 1. Summary of Grade 6 LAUSD teacher participation in immersion institutes and SCALE Study of Middle School Immersion in LAUSD

  6. Teacher Content Knowledge • Teacher content knowledge went from 58% correct to 65% correct for a .57 effect size, which was statistically significant at .05 • Teachers with two or less years of experience had the biggest gains

  7. From observations conducted thus far, 9 or 11 teachers observed are implementing the unit with integrity (two are not)

More Related