1 / 89

Nuclear power in Japan: Fukushima and after

Nuclear power in Japan: Fukushima and after. Richard Tanter Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability rtanter@nautilus.org http://www.nautilus.org/about/associates/richard-tanter/publications This PPT at http://www.nautilus.org/about/associates/richard-tanter/talks

naif
Download Presentation

Nuclear power in Japan: Fukushima and after

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nuclear power in Japan: Fukushima and after Richard Tanter Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability rtanter@nautilus.org http://www.nautilus.org/about/associates/richard-tanter/publications This PPT at http://www.nautilus.org/about/associates/richard-tanter/talks University of Melbourne 19 October 2011

  2. Fukushima I NPP, 2004 Source: Digital Globe, First Watch, Imagery Report, Japan Earthquake/Tsunami, March 2011

  3. Outline • What happened at Fukushima? • What is the situation at Fukushima now? • What will happen from now on? • What have been the health and environmental consequences? • Why did these events occur? • What is the future of nuclear power in Japan? • What are the implications beyond Japan?

  4. Preface • Nuclear power plants: • as a machine • as a socio-technical system • Endemic unsolved issues relevant to all NPPs: • High-level radioactive waste treatment and storage • Operational safety • Nuclear weapon proliferation potential • Post-Fukushima: exposure of workers to resolve loss of coolant accidents • Otherwise, issues specific to particular NPPs and historically specific risk management and operational regimes

  5. 1. What happened at Fukushima?

  6. A swarm of earthquakes (as of 15 March 2011) Source: United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), “Japan: Earthquakes Swarm (15 Mar 2011),”Relief Web,

  7. Nuclear power plants in Japan

  8. Characteristics of Fukushima No. 1 NPP Units 1 - 6 Note: Unit 3 fuel was mixed uranium oxide-plutonium oxide. Source: Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety - The Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations, June 2011, Table IV-1-2.

  9. Boiling Water reactor System

  10. Unit 4 reactor schematic

  11. Fukushima BWR basic design Source: M. Ragheb, Fukushima Earthquake and Tsunami Blackout Accident, 24 June 2011, Figure 21 (from GE and METI)

  12. GE BWR reactor vessel

  13. Unit 1 schematic and inundation level Source: Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety - The Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations, June 2011; Figure III-2-4 (a).

  14. RPV water levels and coolant injection times Source: John H. Large, Update On The Nuclear And Radiological Situation At Fukushima Dai-Ichi, Large & Associates Consulting Engineers, Nr. R3196-AR2, Greenpeace Germany, May 2011; Data source: TEPCO

  15. Unit 1; modelled status of fuel assemblies, melted and slumped Source: Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety - The Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations, June 2011; Attachment IV-!, Reactor Core Conditions of Units 1 to 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Figure 3.1.9.

  16. Spent fuel at Fukushima I NPP Source: Masa Takubo, cited by David Wright, More on Spent Fuel Pools at Fukushima, All Things Nuclear, March 21, 2010

  17. The proximate source: reactor after-heat following insertion of control rods without cooling = meltdown Source: Jan Beyea and Frank von Hippel, “Containment of a Reactor Meltdown,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, August/September 1982

  18. BWR nuclear fuel structure

  19. Unit 4 spent fuel pond - apparently not significantly damaged Source: “No significant damage to fuel at unit 4”, World Nuclear News, 30 April 2011

  20. Key sequences at Fukushima No. 1 NPP: 11 March Pre-quake: • Units 1,2,3 operating; • Units 5 and 6 offline in cold shutdown; • Unit 4 offline; defueled November 2010 14.46 Magnitude 9 earthquake 135 km offshore • Automatic shutdown of Units 1,2, and 3. • Offsite power is lost. • Emergency diesel generators (EDGs) provide coolant power 15.46 14 metre-tsunami breaches plant seawalls and inundates most of the plant • Emergency generators flooded and short-circuited • Battery powered pumping system starts; fails by March 12. 19.30 Fuel assemblies in Unit 1 completely exposed

  21. Station blackout accident: Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System failed with loss off-site and emergency AC power and DC battery power • Off-site power lost in earthquake due to damage to a transformer 10 kms from NPP • 13 emergency diesel generators each “the size of a locomotive”, each 6 MWhr capacity • 8 in the basement of the main turbine hall, two at ground level behind Unit 4 • 12/13 disabled by the tsunami • Batteries supplying DC power exhausted after 9-12 hours

  22. Key sequences at Fukushima No. 1 NPP: 12 - 15 March • Oxidation of zirconium cladding by steam → hydrogen • Zr + 2 H2O → ZrO2 + 2 H2 • March 12: • 15.36 Unit 1 hydrogen explosion destroys upper structure exposing fuel pond; 4 workers injured • March 14 • 11.01 Unit 3 hydrogen explosion destroys upper structure exposing fuel pond; 6 workers injured • March 15 • Fire at Unit 4 spent fuel pond • Hydrogen explosion in Unit 2; suspected damage to wet-well in primary containment. • Explosion at Unit 4 spent fuel pond: origin possibly Unit 3 RPV

  23. Decay curves of short-lived and long-lived isotopes Source: M. Ragheb, Fukushima Earthquake and Tsunami Blackout Accident, 24 June 2011, Fig. 26.

  24. Long half-life fission isotopes Source: M. Ragheb, Fukushima Earthquake and Tsunami Blackout Accident, 24 June 2011.

  25. Japanese government report to IAEA: Fukushima “worse than meltdown?” Source: “'Melt-through' at Fukushima? / Govt report to IAEA suggests situation worse than meltdown”, Yomiuri Shimbun, 8 June 2011.

  26. Fukushima I NPP, 2004 Source: Digital Globe, First Watch, Imagery Report, Japan Earthquake/Tsunami, March 2011

  27. March 14

  28. Seawater pump - March 17 Source: Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Photos 16, Cryptome.org

  29. Flooded electric equipment room, Unit 6, March 17 Source: Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Photos 16, Cryptome.org

  30. 2. What is the situation at Fukushima now?

  31. State of Fukushima No. 1 NPP, as of 14 October:a. reactors and spent fuel Source: Status of countermeasures for restoring from the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 through 4. As of October 14th, 2011. (Estimated by JAIF)

  32. Source: Asahi Shimbun 10 August 2011

  33. State of Fukushima No. 1 NPP, as of 14 October:b. contaminated water leakage and water storage • Contamination of huge volumes of sea-water and freshwater injected and sprayed into containment buildings and spent fuel ponds • Some released to sea • Most stored onsite in turbine building basement, etc. • Some stored on floating barges • Highly radioactive leakages from damaged reactor pressure vessels and containment vessels • into sea and into groundwater

  34. State of Fukushima No. 1 NPP, as of August 30:c. Site debris and contamination Source: TEPCO, Survey map of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, August 22, 2011.

  35. Key current site operations • Heat exchange of cooling water to CPV/RPV • Decontamination of radioactive water in containment vessel, in flooded areas, and in storage • As of 9 August, 42,000 tonnes processed, but 120,000 tonnes remained on site; expected end-year goal of 200,000 tonnes now unlikely • Reducing/eliminating onsite radioactive hotspots • Covering all four units with steel and plastic to reduce air-borne contamination

  36. Cold Shutdown Process Behind Schedule Source: Fukushima Cold Shutdown Process Behind Schedule, NikkeiNet, 17 August 2011

  37. 3. What will happen from now on? • Units 1-4 to be decommissioned; Units 5-6 unclear • New TEPCO “roadmap” presented to JAEC 31 August • Plastic covering for Units 1-4 to contain airborne radiation matter • Cold shut down by January 2012 ….? • By end-2011 will start building ground shield between Units 1-4 and sea • 800 metres long and 20 metres deep • possible extension around whole of Units 1-4 • Removal of fuel from spent fuel ponds 1-4 • Removal of spent fuel from reactors 1-4 • Removal of corium from Units 1,2 and 3 - from RPV and/or CPV • 10-50 years before attempt at reactor/corium removal possible • Decontamination, dismantling and clean-up …. Sometime in the future …

  38. The TEPCO roadmap (as of 17 August 2011) • Basic objective: reactors and nuclear fuel ponds to a stable condition and mitigating release of radioactive materials. • Step 2: • Control of release of radioactive materials • Accelerate processing of water to reduce required volume • then increase rate of water injection by continuous and reinforced circulating injection cooling towards cold shutdown. Source: Summary of Progress Status of Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daichi NPP TEPCO, National Nuclear Response Headquarters, 17 August 2011.

  39. TEPCO: roadmap implementation “issues” • Reactors: confirm functional securiting of water injection system • SFP: more stable cooling • Accelerate water treatment • Groundwater: design shield • Atmosphere/soil - steel/plastic covering • Measurement of radiation and disclosure • Tsunami reinforcement for Unit 4 SNP • Living/working environment • Radiation control/medical care • Staff training Source: Summary of Progress Status of Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daichi NPP TEPCO, National Nuclear Response Headquarters, 17 August 2011.

  40. Model of plastic coverage for Unit 1 Source: TEPCO, Attachment,Outline of the reactor building covering plan of Unit 1 at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Press Release

  41. Unit 1 plastic cover: before and after Source: TEPCO, Attachment, Outline of the reactor building covering plan of Unit 1 at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Press Release

  42. Seaward-side water shield plan Source: TEPCO, Attachment, Basic Design of Water Shield Wall at the Seaside, Press Release 31 August 2011, p. 6.

  43. Seaward-side water shield - schematic cross-section(piles: 1 metre diameter, 14-22 mm. thick, 22-23 metres deep) Source: TEPCO, Attachment, Basic Design of Water Shield Wall at the Seaside, Press Release 31 August 2011, p. 6.

  44. Fukushima No.1 NPP hydrology (pre-quake data) Source: TEPCO, Attachment, Basic Design of Water Shield Wall at the Seaside, Press Release 31 August 2011, p. 7.

  45. Cross-section of hydrology model (pre-quake data) Source: TEPCO, Attachment, Basic Design of Water Shield Wall at the Seaside, Press Release 31 August 2011, p. 7.

  46. Underground water trajectory modelling schematic Source: TEPCO, Attachment, Basic Design of Water Shield Wall at the Seaside, Press Release 31 August 2011, p. 8.

  47. Anticipated underground water levels with seaside-ward water shield in place Source: TEPCO, Attachment, Basic Design of Water Shield Wall at the Seaside, Press Release 31 August 2011, p. 8.

  48. The corium issue • Corium = the liquid or solid slag within or below the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) resulting from a melting of fuel rods, cladding, steel structures, and subsequent chemical reactions and physical events • If the corium melts through the steel RPV to the concrete base-mat of the primary containment vessel (PC or PCV), corium-concrete chemical reactions may include gases including CO, CO2, H2 • There is a further possibility of corium passing through the base-mat if the PCV is ruptured (e.g. by H2 explosion) or if melted by the corium

  49. Debris bed from core melting at Three Mile Island NPP Source: M. Ragheb, Fukushima Earthquake and Tsunami Blackout Accident, 24 June 2011, Figure 43.

  50. Fukushima BWR basic design Source: M. Ragheb, Fukushima Earthquake and Tsunami Blackout Accident, 24 June 2011, Figure 21 (from GE and METI)

More Related