1 / 12

Paper presented at Fourth International Stigma Conference 2009

Determinants of Social Distance towards People suffering from Schizophrenia. Results from a Trend Analysis of two Population Surveys in Austria. Paper presented at Fourth International Stigma Conference 2009 21 st – 23 rd January 2009, London UK Grausgruber, Alfred*

neena
Download Presentation

Paper presented at Fourth International Stigma Conference 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Determinants of Social Distance towards People suffering from Schizophrenia. Results from a Trend Analysis of two Population Surveys in Austria. Paper presented at Fourth International Stigma Conference 2009 21st – 23rd January 2009, London UK Grausgruber, Alfred* Schöny, W.*/Grausgruber-Berner, R.*/Meise, U.*/Koren, G.* *Department of Sociology, Johannes Kepler University of Linz A-4040 Linz, Altenbergerstr. 69, Austria e-mail: alfred.grausgruber@jku.at ** pro mente praevention Austria, Linz A-4020 Linz, Lohnstorferplatz 28, Austria

  2. Background • - Anti-Stigma-Campaigne of the WPA – Austria member • - To get a baseline: First nationwide survey in Austria in 1998 • - Many activities to combat stigmatization and discrimination • - Second representative survey in 2007 • - Attitude comparison of public in 1998 and 2007 • - Impact evaluation of the activities

  3. Aims of the presentation • To examine the impact of various potential determinants of the desire to avoid contacts with people suffering from schizophrenia • To observe any substantial changes in the general structure of the impact factors

  4. Method Representative surveys (16 years +) Table 1: Method – type of vignettes

  5. Method Table 2: Determinants of social distance Statistical analysis: Factor analysis (causal attribution), Guttman and Mokken analysis (social distance), OLS-Regression

  6. Results Table 3. Regression coefficients (stand. ß) of social distance from people with schizophre-nia on causal attribution, perceived treatment success, perceived dangerousness, knowing people suffering from schizophrenia, course of disease and year of survey (n=1240)

  7. Results Table 4. Regression coefficients (stand. ß) of social distance from people with schizo-phrenia on causal attribution, perceived treatment success, perceived dangerousness, knowing people suffering from schizophrenia, course of disease 1998 and 2007

  8. Discussion • Causal attribution, perceived dangerousness, perceived treatment success, perceived course of schizophrenia and familiarity have an independent impact on the desire to contact people suffering from schizophrenia. • Causal Attribution: • Assumed biological factors and personality characteristics (weak character) increase social distance • Assumed social stress increases contacts • Perceived success of treatment, course of treatment and knowing people suffering from schizophrenia have a direct independent positive effect on contacts

  9. Discussion • No independent effect of the year when the survey was conducted • There are modifications in the structure of the determinants between 1998 and 2007, but they do not differ substancially except perceived stress as cause of schizophrenia • No increased influence of perceived success of treatment • Limitations: Not a panel study, social desirability, only one vignette, other factors (e.g. personality, values) not included

  10. Conclusion • Genetics as important causes of schizophrenia leads to more distance: Unintended consequencies of the favoured medical model • Education people about treatment options increases contacts • The most important single impact factor on social contacts is still perceived dangerousness. Perceived dangerousness leads to more distance • How much is the influence of mass media‘s reporting about mental illness and violence?

  11. Conclusion Influence of mass media? On 28th August last year (2007) a 19 year old man confessed, that he had killed another man. Survey conducted: September/Octo-ber 2007

  12. Acknowledgement The survey 2007 was funded by the Ministry of Health, Family and Youth. In 1998 the study was unconditional financially supported by Österreichische Schizophrenie-gesellschaft. The authors are grateful to Hans Bacher and Joachim Gerich (Linz), and Wolfgang Fleischhacker (Innsbruck) for their advice and helpful comments.

More Related