1 / 8

GPC working group (n° 3) How to pursue and deepen relations between the GPC and JPIs

GPC working group (n° 3) How to pursue and deepen relations between the GPC and JPIs. PRESENTATION at the meeting of the GPC 19 May 2014. DRAFT REPORT. Patrick KELLY (IE) Chair of the W orking G roup. Background. data collected from:

netis
Download Presentation

GPC working group (n° 3) How to pursue and deepen relations between the GPC and JPIs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GPC working group (n° 3)How to pursue and deepen relations between the GPC and JPIs PRESENTATION at the meeting of the GPC 19 May 2014 • DRAFT REPORT Patrick KELLY (IE) Chair of the WorkingGroup

  2. Background data collected from: GPC representatives, JPIs, Commission Officials, coordinator of the CSA JPIs to Co-Work. Information obtained by: • questionnaires elaborated by the WG • face-to-face interviews with key actors in the process • meetings (i.e. JPI chair meeting) discussions around 5 meetings (between September 2013 and May 2014). WG discussions / questionnaires focused on: 'how the roles of the GPC, JPIs and Commission services as individual entities and collectively could be enhanced' in order to improve and consolidate their communication structures to facilitate the circulation of complete / timely information to become more efficient. DRAFT REPORT sent to GPC-chair on 7 May 2014

  3. KEY MESSAGES • A properly structured relationship between the actors involved in Joint Programming is needed • The role of the Commission in supporting the Joint programming process can be further improved • Stronger political support at Member States level is needed • GPC should be the key actor to help promote the implementation of JPIs • Active participation by all is needed • JPIs play a key role in the completion of ERA • Need for the JPIs to reach a next step of implementation 3 main recommendationsare addressed to the key stakeholders GPC, JPIs and EC services

  4. RECOMMENDATION 1 As the political and strategic forum for Joint Programming, the GPC requires a clear vision and determined and sustained political commitment from the Member States. Renewal of GPC Mandate Vision and Strategy for the future of Joint Programming JPIs towards Article 185 Establish Single Contact Points MS to establish National Forum for JP Monitoring and implementation of GPC Decisions JPI Reporting to GPC Recommended Cycle of Annual Meetings

  5. Cycle of annual meetings JP annual conference GPC/JPI joint meeting strategic meeting strategic meeting GPC meetings National Fora JPI-chair meetings JP annual conference

  6. RECOMMENDATION 2 The JPIs should work closely with the GPC to address barriers to the implementation of their SRAs and alignment of national research and innovation strategies (and any other issues that arise). JPI reporting to GPC Commission services’ participation in JPI Meetings

  7. RECOMMENDATION 3 The Commission services should streamline their internal coordination and information process/communication channels relating to JP; harmonise the official status of the Commission in the different JPIs and proactively promote JP and the JPIs. Establish an EC Joint Programming Task Force Harmonise Commission representation on JPIs Commission participation in GPC Meetings Ensure articulation with Horizon 2020 Commission services should actively promote JP Encourage participation in JP by all MS/AC Use the secure EC portal/database with a well-defined link to the AT database

  8. AND NOW….. Finalisation of: • Report • Endorsement by GPC Discussion on: • Timeline for implementationof the recommendations • Monitoring of implementation in real time

More Related