1 / 20

Pitch Divergence Suppression of a Subscale Wing in Ground Effect (WIG) Aircraft

Pitch Divergence Suppression of a Subscale Wing in Ground Effect (WIG) Aircraft. 56 th Annual AIAA Southeastern Regional Student Conference April 4-5, 2005 Robert Love Auburn University. What is a WIG Aircraft?.

nika
Download Presentation

Pitch Divergence Suppression of a Subscale Wing in Ground Effect (WIG) Aircraft

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pitch Divergence Suppression of a Subscale Wing in Ground Effect (WIG) Aircraft 56th Annual AIAA Southeastern Regional Student Conference April 4-5, 2005 Robert Love Auburn University

  2. What is a WIG Aircraft? • An aircraft which flies over a mostly level surface at a height lower than half of the span to use advantageous ground effect conditions

  3. Advantages of WIG Aircraft • Chord Dominated • “RAM” effect increases Lift • Span Dominated • Reduction of wing tip vortices dramatically lowers induced drag • Therefore high L/D ratios

  4. History of WIG Aircraft • Designs are extremely varied • Early Designs • U. S. “Spruce Goose” • Russian “Erkanoplans” • The KM, Lun and Orlyronk in the (1960’s) • PAR motors, strait wing • Amphistar • The Lippisch Design, single motor • Airfisch 3 • L-325 Flarecraft

  5. What is being done now? • Australia • FS-8 (with Singapore) • Incat Wing (trimaran with WIG support) • China • TY-1 • XTW-4 • United States • Boeing Pelican • Aerocon Atlantis 1 • Germany • Hoverwing • X-114

  6. Introduction • Divergence due to ground effect is well known in other fields • Longitudinal Stability a historic problem for WIG aircraft • Sudden pitch and height changes cause divergence • Contributors • High thrust line, throttle cut too quickly, lack of inherent stability, wrong CG, slowness/inability to respond to pitching motions • Caused loss of many aircraft, reputation as unreliable

  7. Previous Approaches • Structural Fixes • Large Tail Wing, Canards, slats, elevators, the Lippisch design of the wing, S-shaped airfoils • Disadvantages include large amounts of drag and little effectiveness • Tweaking Dynamic Characteristics • Movement of the center of pitch, center of gravity, and aerodynamic center • Some success, but dependent on careful balancing

  8. The Aircraft Model • Based off of Graham Taylor’s MK5 WizzyWIG XGE plans • Materials Used • Balsa wood • Carbon fiber motor mounts • Bonding with Cyano-Acrylate Resin and Hysol 9433 • Covered with model skinning material and flashing tape • Hardware • 3 Astro 020 Direct Drive Brushless motors • 3 Lithium Polymer Batteries • 2 servos, 1 JR DS368 and 1 Futaba FP-S-14B • 1 Cirrius micropiezo MPG-10 gyroscope • Overall Size • 2.5 lbs, 3.5 ft long, 11.5 in high, CG at 1/3rd of chord • Main wing 17.5 in span by 17 in chord

  9. The Aircraft Model • Notable Features • PAR motor mount to serve as an elevator (-5° to 40°) • Canard wing • Large tail wing • Upward slope of body in front and back • Flat main wing with sponsons • Center of Gravity Location and connection to rig at this location

  10. Experimental Procedure • First Flight-free flight on January 27, 2005 experienced divergence at low speed • Whirl test rig made to test the longitudinal stability of the aircraft in a stable environment • Test settings • With and without maximized gain pitch rate feedback stabilization • Full and Half Elevator Deflection • Throttle setting at 2.5, 3, and 4 of 6 • Digital Video analyzed with ImagePro Analysis software • velocity, divergence times, and body pitch attitudes

  11. Results • Effect of Rate Stabilization on Divergence Times for Full Elevator Deflection

  12. Results

  13. Results • Divergence prevention by pitch rate feedback system for speed of 29.7 ft/s without gyroscope and 33.0 ft/s with gyroscope, at throttle 3 settings

  14. Results • Overall View of the Effectiveness of the Pitch Divergence Suppression at Half Elevator with Pitch Rate Feedback System

  15. Summary of Results • Longitudinal instability for full elevator • Divergence was not preventable through pitch rate stabilization with a gyroscope • Longitudinal instability for half elevator • Suppressed at speeds lower than 26 ft/s indicated by divergence taking three times longer than without stabilization • Prevented completely at speeds higher than 30 ft/s through pitch rate stabilization

  16. Significance • Increased thrust available to overcome “hump drag” due to higher allowable elevator settings • Increased stability for transitioning between modes • Increased maneuverability to avoid obstacles • Increased reaction time for pilot or control system to prevent divergence as it starts to occur • Increased “pitch stiffness” of aircraft without substantial drag penalties from large tail or canard wings • Increased safety margin • Simplified design while providing a solution to problem

  17. Conclusion • Divergence of a subscale wing in ground effect aircraft was able to be suppressed or prevented using a pitch rate feedback system at speeds from 20 ft/s to 45 ft/s for an elevator disturbance which normally would cause divergence.

  18. Thanks • To Auburn University and Dr. Ron Barrett for support and technical advice • To Christoph Burger and Adam Chesler for lab help and construction advice • To Graham Taylor for the WIZZYWIG plans and technical advice • To all the other employees of the Adaptive Aerostructures Lab for their occasional helping hands and encouragement

  19. References • 1. Online. “Divergence”. 2005. April 1, 2005. http://www.hypercraft-associates/divergence/divergence.htm. • 2. Online. The Wig Page. “Wing in Ground Effect Aerodynamics.” 2005. February 14, 2005. http://www.se-technology.com/wig/index.php. • 3. Online. “Wing in Ground Effect Aerodynamics.” 2005. March 18, 2005. http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/aerodynamics/q0130.shtml. • 4. Online. 2005. March 18, 2005. http://foxxaero.homestead.com/indrad_044.html. • 5. Taylor, G. K., “Are you missing the boat? The Ekranoplan in the 21st Century Its Possibilities and Limitations”. February 2002, 18th Fast Ferry Conference, 2002.

  20. Questions?

More Related