1 / 40

IEEE 802.11 TGbb January 2019 Agenda

This presentation contains the agenda for the IEEE 802.11 TGbb meeting in January 2019. It includes administrative items, operating rules, guidelines for IEEE meetings, and patent-related information.

nreid
Download Presentation

IEEE 802.11 TGbb January 2019 Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Light Communications Task Group (TGbb) January 2019 Agenda Date: 2018-12-10 Author: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  2. Abstract This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 TGbb agenda for the January 2019 session. Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  3. Administrative Items • Required notices • IEEE Code of Ethics • http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html • IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Affiliation FAQ • http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliation.html • Antitrust and Competition Policy • http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  4. Task Group Operating Rules • Anybody can present • Anybody can vote on straw polls • Only WG members can make and vote on motions • Participation in a Task Group during 802.11 Plenary or Interim counts towards voting rights • Procedural motions must pass by a 50% majority • Technical motions must pass by a 75% majority Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  5. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. • --------------------------------------------------------------- • See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  6. Participants have a duty to inform the IEEE • Participants shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the identity of each holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • Participants should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the identity of any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is encouraged Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  7. Ways to inform IEEE • Cause an LOA to be submitted to the IEEE-SA (patcom@ieee.org); or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible; or • Speak up now and respond to this Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance, please respond at this time by providing relevant information to the WG Chair Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  8. Patent-related information The patent policy and the procedures used to execute that policy are documented in the: • IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws(http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6) • IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual(http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect6.html#6.3) Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/materials.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  9. Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings • All participation in IEEE 802 Working Group meetings is on an individual basis • •     Participants in the IEEE standards development individual process shall act based on their qualifications and experience. (https://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdfsection 5.2.1) • •    IEEE 802 Working Group membership is by individual; “Working Group members shall participate in the consensus process in a manner consistent with their professional expert opinion as individuals, and not as organizational representatives”. (subclause 4.2.1 “Establishment”, of the IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures) • Participants have an obligation to act and vote as an individual and not under the direction of any other individual or group. A Participant’s obligation to act and vote as an individual applies in all cases, regardless of any external commitments, agreements, contracts, or orders. • Participants shall not direct the actions or votes of any other member of an IEEE 802 Working Group or retaliate against any other member for their actions or votes within IEEE 802 Working Group meetings, see https://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdf section 5.2.1.3 and the IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures, subclause 3.4.1 “Chair”, list item x. • By participating in IEEE 802 meetings, you accept these requirements. If you do not agree to these policies then you shall not participate. • (Latest revision of IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures: http://www.ieee802.org/devdocs.shtml) Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  10. Attendance recording procedures https://imat.ieee.org/my-site/home Must register before logging attendance Must log attendance during each 2-hour session Documentation http://mentor.ieee.org Use “TGbb” for submission If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising Logistics (1) Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  11. Logistics (2) Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  12. LC TG schedule in a glance Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  13. Agenda items for the week • Agenda Agreement • Submissions to be discussed • Analytical channel model and blockage model • Use of front-end models and link to channel model • PHY evaluation metrics • Evaluation Framework document • Hear proposals • TGbb Timeline update • Conference call schedule Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  14. Meeting Slot #1 Monday, AM2 10:30 – 12:30 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  15. Agenda • Call meeting to order • Patent policy and logistics • Submissions to be discussed today? • Approve minutes from Nov. 2018 • Approve minutes from the teleconferences • Analytical channel model and blockage model • Doc. 11-18/2037r1 • Use of front-end models and link to channel model • Update front-end models: doc. 11-18/1574r5. • PHY evaluation metrics • Doc. 11-18/1429r3 • Recess Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  16. Motion to approve the agenda • Approve the proposed agenda in doc. 11-18/2122r1 for the week • Move: Volker Jungnickel • Second: Harry Bims • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  17. Straw Poll • Should the Evaluation Methodology document specify the pre-defined/deterministic mobility traces/trajectories for evaluating the system-level performance? • Y / N / A 4/1/6 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  18. Straw Poll • Should the Evaluation Methodology document specify the statistical model for example for evaluating the system-level performance, a uniform user distribution in a given fixed AP allocation to generate a Monte-Carlo outcome? • Y / N / A 2 / 1 / 8 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  19. Straw Poll • Should the Evaluation Methodology document specify the statistical model for evaluating the system-level performance, for example a uniform user distribution with APs placed in a given random distribution in a space to generate a Monte-Carlo outcome? • Y / N / A 1 / 2 / 5 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  20. Motion to approve the minutes from November 2018 • Approve the minutes from the November 2018 plenary session in doc. 11-18/1993r6 • Move: Volker Jungnickel • Second: Athanasios Stavridis • Yes: • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  21. Motion to table the Motion to approve the minutes from November 2018 • Table the motion to approve the minutes from the November 2018 plenary session in doc. 11-18/1993r6 • Move: Marc Emmelmann • Second: Volker Jungnickel • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  22. Meeting Slot #2 Tuesday, AM2 10:30 – 12:30 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  23. Agenda • Call meeting to order • Patent policy and logistics • Submissions to be discussed today? • Approve minutes from Nov. 2018 • Approve minutes from the teleconferences • Editor meeting feedback • PHY evaluation metrics • Evaluation Methodology document • Doc. 11-18/1429r4 • Recess Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  24. Motion to approve the minutes from November 2018 • Approve the minutes from the November 2018 plenary session in doc. 11-18/1993r9 • Move: Stephen McCann • Second: Volker Jungnickel • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  25. Motion to approve teleconference minutes • Approve the minutes from the teleconference meetings held between the November 2018 session and the January 2019 session: • 5 Dec. (doc. 11-18/2106r1) • 19 Dec. (doc. 11-18/2163r3) • 9 Jan. (doc. 11-19/0049r1) Mover: Athanasios Stavridis Second: Stephen McCann Yes: unanimous consent No: Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  26. Meeting Slot #3 Wednesday, AM1 08:00 – 10:00 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  27. Agenda • Call meeting to order • Patent policy and logistics • Submissions to be discussed today? • Meeting slots for Vancouver meeting • Discussion on the Evaluation Methodology • Doc. 11-18/1429r4 • Adjourn Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  28. Motion to amend the agenda • Amend the proposed agenda in doc. 11-18/2122r2 for the week as shown in doc. 11-18/2122r3 • Move: Harry Bims • Second: Volker Jungnickel • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  29. Straw poll • Is Shot Noise as a parameter considered relevant for the Evaluation Methodology? • Y / N / A 1 / 4 / 3 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  30. Meeting Slot #4 Wednesday, PM2 16:00 – 18:00 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  31. Agenda • Call meeting to order • Patent policy and logistics • Submissions to be discussed today? • How to simplify MAC simulations in TGbb • Doc. 11-19/0178r2 • Discussion on the Evaluation Methodology • Doc. 11-19/0187r0 • Doc. 11-19/0186r0 • Doc. 11-18/1429r4 • Recess Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  32. Motion to amend the agenda • Amend the proposed agenda in doc. 11-18/2122r3 for the week as shown in doc. 11-18/2122r4 • Move: Harry Bims • Second: Volker Jungnickel • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  33. Motion • Accept doc. 11-19/0187r0 as the TGbb Evaluation Methodology document. • Move: Volker Jungnickel • Second: Athanasios Stavridis • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  34. Straw Poll • Are less than 10 channel impulse responses sufficient to evaluate the relative performance of different PHY proposals? • Y / N / A 4 / 0 / 4 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  35. Meeting Slot #5 Thursday, AM2 10:30 – 12:30 Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  36. Agenda • Call meeting to order • Patent policy and logistics • Administrative Items • TGbb Timeline update • Doc. 11-18/1290r1 • Conference call schedule • Submissions to be discussed today? • Discussion on the Evaluation Methodology • Doc. 11-19/0186r1 • Doc. 11-19/0187 • Adjourn Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  37. Motion teleconference schedule TGbb would like to request the following teleconference times: • 09:30 AM EDT for 1h on 1 Feb. • 09:30 AM EDT for 1h on 15 Feb. • 09:30 AM EDT for 1h on 7 Mar. • Move: Volker Jungnickel • Second: Athanasios Stavridis • Y / N / A unanimous consent Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  38. Motion • Accept doc. 11-18/1290r2 as the TGbb timeline. • Move: Volker Jungnickel • Second: Athanasios Stavridis • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  39. Motion • Move to accept the Evaluation Methodology as contained in doc. 11-19/0186r2 and incorporate its contents into the TGbb Evaluation Methodology document doc. 11-19/0187 • Move: Volker Jungnickel • Second: Marc Emmelmann • Yes: unanimous consent • No: • Abstain: Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

  40. References Nikola Serafimovski (pureLiFi)

More Related