1 / 32

Visual Illusions

Visual Illusions. Playing with Perspective. CS99D Final Project By: Jason Anderson Professor Marc Levoy. William Hogarth. 1754 - "Whoever makes a DESIGN without the knowledge of PERSPECTIVE will be liable to such Absurdities as are shown in this Frontispiece.".

omer
Download Presentation

Visual Illusions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Visual Illusions Playing with Perspective CS99D Final Project By: Jason Anderson Professor Marc Levoy

  2. William Hogarth 1754 - "Whoever makes a DESIGN without the knowledge of PERSPECTIVE will be liable to such Absurdities as are shown in this Frontispiece." Source: W. Hogarth, 1697-1764 Trustees of the British Museum.

  3. Theories of Geometrical Illusions • Eye-movement  perceived length • Perspective cues • Transactionalist approach • Adaptation-level theory

  4. Eye-Movement Theory • Line length  eye movement • Testable, but usually fails – initial perception, eyes are stable • Finding an index of eye movements a problem

  5. Müller-Lyer Lines • Eye-movement theory: Arrowheads influence extent of eye movements

  6. Perspective Cues • Pictures converted in our brain from 2-dimensional drawings to represent 3-dimensional scenes • Different level of explanation – does not propose a mechanism for perception • Well established, although some ‘loopholes’ have been found

  7. Müller-Lyer Lines Revisited • The same illusion through perspective cues • Oculomotor Macropsia/Micropsia

  8. Transactionalist Theory • The world is a product of perception, not a cause of it • Hamlet: Do you see yonder cloud that’s almost in shape of a camel? • Polonius: By the Mass, and ‘tis like a camel indeed. • Hamlet: Methinks it is like a weasel • Polonius: It is backed like a weasel • Hamlet: Or like a whale? • Polonius: Very like a whale Hamlet (Act III, Scene II) • Change our way of looking  Perception will change Old Man

  9. Adaptation-Level Theory • Helson, 1964 – “spatial pooling” • Green & Stacey, 1966 applied to illusions • Past stimulation  current stimulation • “stored norms” • “Top-down processing” • Some flaws – Ames room

  10. Depth Cues on a Flat Surface • 1967, R.L. Gregory – all pictures are “impossible objects” • Conflicting depth cues in the content of the picture with the flat surface on which it is presented

  11. Retinal Disparity • No retinal disparity on a flat surface • As a viewer of an image, we choose to suppress the cue of retinal disparity Source: http://frank.mtsu.edu/~pyskip/splec6.htm

  12. The Acceptance of Perspective • We have come to accept that although we are seeing a flat surface, that the objects on it represent 3 dimensional concepts • Pictorial cues: interposition (occlusion), relative size, linear perspective & texture gradients • Ambiguous dimensional cues can lend themselves to be great visual illusions

  13. Depth Ambiguity • Because of the way everything we see is projected onto the retina, there is a great deal of ambiguity

  14. Wundt’s crosses • Hering (1879) & Wundt (1898) • Most ambiguous of all figures • Infinite number of interpretations, but perceptual system tries to settle with a ‘best’ one

  15. Sanford’s figure • Sanford, 1903 • Although there may be an obvious ‘best’ interpretation, once can easily be persuaded to accept an alternate one!

  16. Of Ambiguous Figures and Depth Reversals • Necker cube • Mach Book

  17. Of Ambiguous Figures & Depth Reversals 2 • Not enough information in the image to make a decision as to the “best” interpretation • Taken advantage of to create “impossible” figures

  18. The ‘freemish’ crate • Cochran’s photo of his ‘freemish’ crate (1966).

  19. How did he do that??? Any guesses?

  20. Viewing from a single, special perspective • Viewing the image from a misleading perspective • Viewing from another angle wrecks the effect • Monocular viewing required • Occlusion

  21. Misleading depth cues • Stage scenery – gives impression of greater depth • The Ames Room

  22. The Ames Room

  23. Of Giants and Dwarves? • Of course not! • But how?

  24. What’s going on here? • Adelbert Ames, Jr. (1946) – concept by Helmoltz • Special viewpoint – monocular • Floor, ceiling, some walls, & windows are trapezoidal • Inclined floor • Appears as a normal cubic room

  25. So how does it work? • Peephole removes stereopsis • Forms an identical image of a cubic room on your retina • Both corners of the room subtend the same visual angle to your eye – appear equidistant • Seckel & Klarke:Past experiencesnot relevant

  26. But what about the people? • A split between perception & expectation • Apparent cubic perspective overrides sense of size constancy • Stanford psychologistRobert Shepherd – use background & relationship to the horizon to judge size

  27. Retinal Size != Apparent Size • Distance cues: relative size of elements, separation, density, clarity, background

  28. But is the Ames Room necessary? • Seckel and Klarke: only charm • An apparent horizontal path is all that’s necessary • Richard Gregory: same effect, ambiguous background

  29. The Moon Illusion • Perceived distance, visual angle, & linear size != physical values • Illusion from comparison of perceived values at the horizon & at the zenith • Subtends .5º in the eye no matter what • Not atmospheric • Illusion disappears in a “mooning position” 

  30. Theories • Apparent distance theory – appears farther away  larger • Size-distance paradox • Distance, visual angle,& linear size illusionswork together • Oculomotor micropsia / macropsia  visual angle • Distance cues  macropsia forhorizon moon

  31. The Mystery Spot • Tilted house • No visible horizon – assumed horizon with internal reference frame of house • Your body is on a tilt as well – enhances effectsas much as 3x • Application topilots

  32. A new perspective on seeing • Many theories, none are all-encompassing yet • New ways to see things – become more aware of space through witnessing these illusions • Perspective is a powerful tool – in ‘imitating’ reality, it can also deceive • Seeing is believing  Perceiving is believing

More Related