1 / 29

Consideration of Michigan Pursuing an NRC Agreement

Consideration of Michigan Pursuing an NRC Agreement . A Discussion with Stakeholders March 2, 2007. Presenters: Jim Sygo, Deputy Director, DEQ Jan Christensen, Deputy Director, DCH George Bruchmann, DEQ Thor Strong, DEQ Sheri Minnick, NRC. DEQ Thor Strong 517-241-1252 Robert Skowronek

oni
Download Presentation

Consideration of Michigan Pursuing an NRC Agreement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Consideration of Michigan Pursuing an NRC Agreement A Discussion with Stakeholders March 2, 2007

  2. Presenters: Jim Sygo, Deputy Director, DEQ Jan Christensen, Deputy Director, DCH George Bruchmann, DEQ Thor Strong, DEQ Sheri Minnick, NRC

  3. DEQ Thor Strong 517-241-1252 Robert Skowronek 517-241-1253 T.R. Wentworth 517-241-1438 DCH Tom Freebury 517-241-1968 Bruce Matkovich 517-241-1993 Don Parry 517-241-1986 DEQ/DCH Work Group

  4. Goals for Today • Present Case for an Agreement State • Provide Stakeholders an Opportunity for Comment • Solicit Stakeholder Support and Commitment • Obtain Volunteers for an Advisory Committee

  5. What is an Agreement State? • Section 274(b) of Atomic Energy Act provides for transfer of certain NRC authority to states. • State chooses to assume authority over any of these categories: • Radioactive Materials - Section 11e(1)(2)(3)(4) • Source Materials • Special Nuclear Materials (small quantities) • Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal • Sealed Sources and Device Safety Evaluations

  6. What is an Agreement State? • Section 274(b) of Atomic Energy Act provides for transfer of certain NRC authority to states. • State chooses to assume authority over any of these categories: • Radioactive Materials - Section 11e(1) (2) (3) (4) • Source Materials • Special Nuclear Materials (small quantities) • Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal • Sealed Sources and Device Safety Evaluations

  7. What is an Agreement State? For the categories included in Agreement: • State becomes responsible for all phases of regulatory oversight: licensing, inspection, enforcement, decommissioning; • State sets and retains own fees; • NRC periodically evaluates state’s performance.

  8. AGREEMENT STATES AGREEMENT STATES

  9. Advantages To the Licensee: • Better service; • Regulatory Agency more accessible and responsive; • Regulatory authority centered in one agency, rather than two or three; • Reduced Annual Fees.

  10. Advantages To the State: • Greater capability to deal with all radiation issues, incidents, threats; • Individual programs strengthened; • Fees remain in state.

  11. Disadvantages Cited in Some Agreement States • Fees not necessarily reduced for all licensees; • Some Agreement States have more restrictive rules; • Growing pains; • Lots of work!

  12. How to Become an Agreement State • Letter of Intent from the Governor • Statute/Rules Revisions needed to meet NRC criteria • Adequate Staffing • Adequate Training and Expertise • 4-5 Year Process.

  13. Key Conditions for Proceeding With Agreement State Proposal • Better protection of the public; • Better responsiveness to licensees – efficacy; • Better synergy of resources – efficiency; • Operate program at a lower cost (than NRC); • Share cost savings with licensees as much as possible.

  14. Our Proposed Strategy • Time Line • Staffing • Agreement State Program Funding Needs • Program Development Funding Concept

  15. Timeline An aggressive timeline to finalize an NRC Agreement in 4 – 5 years. • Letter of Intent – May, 2007 • Introduction of Legislation – May, 2007 • Program Consolidation – late 2007 • Submittal of Application – August, 2010 • Signing of an Agreement – Sept. 2011

  16. Staffing Adequate, well-trained staff is a prerequisite to signing an Agreement • Current Program Staff: 3.5 FTEs • Projected Additional Program Staff: 10 FTEs (8 tech., 2 admin. support) • 2.25 FTEs per 100 licensees; • Added staff to be hired 2008-2011; • Tech. Staff must be trained prior to submitting Agreement Application.

  17. Program Financing Assure that a State Program can be conducted for lower costs than that of NRC’s. • Other Agreement States program costs are less than that of NRC’s; annual fees often less; • Most licensees will pay less; • Retain Small Entity discount and Academic Fee exemptions.

  18. Comparison of Fees(if Michigan was an Agreement State)

  19. Program Start-up Funding Develop a Funding Mechanism that is limited, reasonable and equitable. • NRC provides no funding – State must develop a functional and capable program before signing Agreement; • State will not provide start-up funds; • Recommending a four year interim fee system.

  20. Interim Fee Structure • WI used a fixed percentage of NRC fees each year for 4 years; • We propose: • Fixed fee for 4 years - based on percentage of NRC fee in Year 1 (2007) • Fee will generate $ 849,400/year

  21. Interim Fee

  22. Financial Summary • Assuming comparable cost increases for both NRC and State, State fees in 2012 will be 32% less than comparable NRC fees; • Most licensees will recoup their interim fee expenditures in less than 4 years; • If NRC fees remained at 2007 levels, MI fees in 2012 would still be 9% less.

  23. Training Need to train staff quickly but fully. • Use NRC courses as needed; take advantage of “space available” spots; • Sponsor NRC courses in Michigan • Shadow NRC inspectors – doing so now; • Visit other Agreement States; • Work with MI licensees to identify other opportunities.

  24. NRC Sheri Minnick Regional Government Liaison Officer, Region 3, Lisle, IL 630-829-9659 SAM9@nrc.gov

  25. Agreement State Questions Contact: James Lynch, Regional Agreement State Officer, NRC Region 3 630-829-9661 JLL2@nrc.gov

  26. Energy Policy Act of 2005 Contact: Kevin Null, Senior Health Physicist, NRC Region 3 at 630-829-9854 KGN@nrc.gov

  27. “I believe that all good things come to those who wait – provided they work feverishly while they are waiting.” Dale Klein NRC Chairman

  28. Questions and Discussion

More Related