1 / 32

Prepared by :Ayman Shtayah Qais Samarah Supervisor : Dr. Imad Ibrik

Analysis of Electrification of Remote Villages in Palestine by using: PV system, Diesel, or Extension Electrical Network. Prepared by :Ayman Shtayah Qais Samarah Supervisor : Dr. Imad Ibrik. Background. Palestine suffers from: A non-secure electrical network

pavel
Download Presentation

Prepared by :Ayman Shtayah Qais Samarah Supervisor : Dr. Imad Ibrik

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis of Electrification of Remote Villages in Palestineby using: PV system, Diesel, or Extension Electrical Network Prepared by :Ayman Shtayah Qais Samarah Supervisor : Dr. Imad Ibrik

  2. Background Palestine suffers from: • A non-secure electrical network • Palestinian Authority (PA) does not have any independence network in the West Bank • The electrical loads are increased, but the grid does not expand

  3. Background • Palestine has a high solar radiation (Gr) and peak sunshine hours (PSH) amounts to about 3000h and this is enough to produce solar energy in a sustainable way. • Availability of a large number of rural villages isolated from the electric grid. • High fuel cost in Palestine .

  4. PrimaryPurposes • Economics comparison among photovoltaic system (PV), diesel generator (DG), hybrid PV-DG, and expansion electrical network

  5. Secondary Purposes • Trial to feed more areas of electricity. • Reduce the phenomenon of immigration from rural areas to cities & congestion in cities. • Reduce the pollution of the atmosphere from diesel generators & product CO2.

  6. Scope (PV alone system) • It usually consists of: PV array, charge battery controller, inverter, and lead acid battery.

  7. Scope (DG alone systems) • DG are widely used sources for remote off-grid areas mainly due to their low capital costs. • It needs regular maintenance, fuel, filters, oils,..etc. and employee

  8. Scope (Hybrid PV-DG systems -Series ) • it combines between PV & DG to make stable systems, because DG cover the reduction in energy of battery • We add controller rectifier to convert AC to DC

  9. Scope (Expansion electrical network ) • It requires many as: conductors, insulators, towers, truss, transformer, switch gears,… etc. • It is more stable, but it is rarely existing on remote village

  10. Studying Load (Froosh Beit Dajan) • located at east of Nablus 40km • their population about 769 inhabitants in 100 houses • . It suffers from preventive, confiscation of lands and water • no electrical network despite of IEC pass through it. • The nearest point of medium voltage 33KV return to PA far 6km at Aien Sheply village.

  11. Main loads existing in Froosh Biet Dajan • Residential loads: it distributed to centralized & decentralized • Telecommunication tower loads (Jawwal tower): it distributed to AC, AC/DC and DC. • Water Pumping loads: it has 5 main pumps but we chose Ibasi pump only.

  12. Daily load curve Decentralized centralized

  13. Pmax & daily energy • After Studying the loads , we can get: • we get E after dividing the energy by ηTL = 94%

  14. The Sizing of the systems- PV:residential & tower • PV generator, storage battery, controller, inverter: • we applied 4 Gr at 4 tilted angle (0, 20, 32, 45) • ηv= 92%, ηc = 95%, ηB = 85% ,Ad= 1.5 , DOD= 75%

  15. The Sizing of the systems- PV:residential & tower • On tower we applied the min month Gr to keep the loads operating all times • Because the land of the tower is rented (not personal ) we add the size of land • a = area for 1kwp=7.055m2

  16. The Sizing of the systems- PV:water pumping • PV generator, square inverter, induction motor • we applied average Gr from May to October (when pump operating) • ηv= 92%, ηm = 90%,V = m3/day ,TDH= 1.05*H , η p= 95% • We take percentages of Eh when we applying equations

  17. The Sizing of the systems-existing DG: residential Ibasi pump tower

  18. The Sizing of the systems- hybrid:residential & tower • PV generator, storage battery, controller, inverter: is the same size of PV alone. • in tower we used average Gr because the DG get more stability of the system. • We used Ad= 1 day • Size of :DG rectifier

  19. The Sizing of the systems- hybrid:residential & tower • To calculate the consumption of diesel and operating hour per year of DG, we must determine the percent that DG covered as follows:

  20. The Sizing of the systems- hybrid:water pumping • the diesel pumping used to compensate the percentage of Eh covered by PV. That means we cover 100% of Eh by two systems: PV and diesel, so we used two pumps for each. • e.g.: when the percentage of PV is 10% then the percentage of diesel is 90%

  21. The Sizing of the systems-Expansion electrical network • When electrical network will be expanded, all loads in the village will be benefited from it.

  22. The Sizing of the systems-Expansion electrical network

  23. Economical study Normal case applied without any considerations of existing DG in the village Replacement case The existing DG enters economical study as salvage value , subtract from present cost Continuing case DG existing now work on hybrid system , no fixed cost of DG

  24. Results PV alone:

  25. Results PV alone: 0 20 32 45

  26. Results DG alone:

  27. comparison of $/kwh for Ibasi pump DG alone & PV alone at different percentage of Eh

  28. Results hybrid:

  29. Results hybrid: 0 20 32 45

  30. Results of extension network:

  31. Conclusion • The most economical alternative to electrify the village is extension electrical network, but we know that is prevented since 1967. • The most economical alternative to electrify the residential is the PV decentralized system at tilt 20 or 32 • The second economical alternative to electrify the residential is the hybrid system at tilt angle= 32, and it is more than reliable PV

  32. Conclusion • The most economical alternative to electrify the tower is the hybrid with DC system at tilt 32, and it more than reliable PV • The second economical alternative to electrify the tower is the existing DG (it is more economical than PV) • The most economical alternative to electrify the pump is the diesel water pumping as existing now.

More Related