1 / 20

Mobile Medical Records

Mobile Medical Records. Paul Brittan Shelley Petzer. Overview. Introduction Problem Statement Research Questions Evaluation Work Allocation Related Work Key Success Factors Risks Timeline Conclusion. Introduction.

pearl
Download Presentation

Mobile Medical Records

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mobile Medical Records Paul Brittan Shelley Petzer

  2. Overview • Introduction • Problem Statement • Research Questions • Evaluation • Work Allocation • Related Work • Key Success Factors • Risks • Timeline • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • Aim is to investigate the secure storage of medical records on cell phones • Original idea was proposed by Simelela • Provide patients with the means to securely manage their medical records • Main Focus for the project • Compressing the data for storage • Secure transfer & encryption of data • Rudimentary interface for testing purposes

  4. Problem Statement • Designing applications in developing countries • Access to more advanced technology is limited • A cell phone is ideal because of its diversity • However cell phones create issues • Challenges related to the limited resources • Ensuring the privacy of the medical record

  5. Research Questions (Paul) • Comparison of storing medical records on the internal memory of the cell phone as opposed to a microSDcard • The performance comparisons of compression algorithms • Involves the analysis of several lossless compression algorithms • Reducing the storage space of the medical record whilst minimising the resources used

  6. Research Questions (Shelley) • The performance comparisons of encryption algorithms • Involves the analysis of several algorithms • Finding an algorithm that maximises security • Minimising the resources required by the cell phone • The transmission medium between the cell phone and a medical database • Investigate the strengths and weaknesses of Bluetooth technology and wireless networks for transmission

  7. Evaluation • Test the performance of the encryption & compression algorithms • Test algorithms on anonymised medical records • Analysed according to efficiency and based on resources used • Ideally, we want comparable measurements for • Execution time • CPU usage • Memory usage

  8. Evaluation Cont. • Research needs to be done on testing applications for mid-tier phones • Performance monitors • Benchmark tests • Last Resort • Measure the battery power on the cell phone before and after each test

  9. Work Allocation (system)

  10. Work Allocation (testing)

  11. Ethical, professional and legal issues • Ethical issues involved with medical record data • privacy • Plan to use anonymised medical records • No ethics clearance is required • No user testing will take place

  12. Related Work • Systems that provide electronic medical records • OpenMRS • Medical records on a cell phone • JavaRosa • Open Data Kit clinic • Early stages of development • Privacy not a priority

  13. Anticipated outcomes • Prototype that allows the following: • Storage of medical records on a cell phone • Transmission of medical records between a cell phone and medical database • Encryption and compression of the medical record • Performance analysis

  14. Key success factors • Storage and transmission of the medical record • Efficient • Secure • Compressed • Storing the medical record on the internal memory • Transmission using Bluetooth • Analysis of encryption and compression algorithms

  15. Risks • Failure to successfully measure performance • Failure to meet milestones • Hardware failure • Gathering medical record data • Group member becomes unavailable

  16. Timeline • Research and design: 15 days • Algorithm implementation and testing: 20 days • Merging components with testing: 22 days • Dedicated report writing: 20 days

  17. Conclusion • The project will contribute towards a mobile medical record framework • Benefit patients and medical practitioners in medical record management • The project will attempt to cater for developing areas and consider the limitations of a cell phone

  18. Questions ?

  19. Gantt Chart Team Paul Shelley

  20. Timeline

More Related