1 / 22

34 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy Security Planning and Military Transformation a

USJFCOM. 34 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy Security Planning and Military Transformation after Iraqi Freedom LTG Robert Wagner Deputy Commander, USJFCOM 3 December 2003. UNCLASSIFIED. Overview. Main Points.

penn
Download Presentation

34 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy Security Planning and Military Transformation a

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. USJFCOM 34th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security Strategy and Policy Security Planning and Military Transformation after Iraqi Freedom LTG Robert Wagner Deputy Commander, USJFCOM 3 December 2003 UNCLASSIFIED Overview

  2. Main Points • The need to transform in a changing environment • Dedicated transformation organizations can accelerate change – if integrated and resourced • Transformation is comprehensive: all organizations and functions – military, interagency, and partner nations • Transformation incorporates doctrine, training, resources, employment & lessons learned – it is not just theoretical • Partnerships are essential and powerful Transformation is about Culture and Product

  3. = JFCOM Priority Department of Defense Priorities • Successfully Pursue the Global War on Terrorism • Strengthen Combined/Joint Warfighting Capabilities • Transform the Joint Force • Optimize Intelligence Capabilities • Counter Proliferation of WMD • Improve Force Manning • New Concepts of Global Engagement • Homeland Security • Streamline DoD Processes • Reorganize DOD and USG to Deal with Pre-War Opportunities and Post-War Responsibilities Transformation is a top U.S. defense priority

  4. USJFCOM Mission USJFCOM maximizes the Nation’s future and present military capabilities by leading the transformation of joint forces, through (1)joint concept development and experimentation, identifying (2)joint requirements, advancing interoperability, conducting (3)joint training, and (4)providing ready continental U.S.-based forces and capabilities – all to support the Combatant Commands.

  5. Transformation • Changing the nature of military competition and cooperation through new combinations of concepts, capabilities, and organizations to help underpin peace and stability in the world. • Transformation includes a full range from new high tech weapons to changing the way we think, train, exercise, fight and our partnerships in a complex world. Transformation is about Culture and Product

  6. Peace Conflict War Why Transform? The Environment is Changing Currently optimized for this • The Threat is Changing • Our adversaries will: • fight by any means • seek to deceive us • exploit opportunities • learn as they go Need better balance across the spectrum Our Capabilities are Evolving Capabilities must be optimized for the changing environment

  7. Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Army Forces Air Forces Interagency Marine Forces Marine Forces Marine Forces Navy Forces Navy Forces Navy Forces SOF SOF SOF Multinational Transforming the Joint Force The U.S. approach Coherently Joint Collaborative Coordination Effects-Based Network Centric Interagency-Multinational Deconflict Service Forces Integration of Service Capabilities Stitch Service Seams Services Deconflicting A Full Spectrum capabilities-based joint force Services Coordinating Services Integrating The Future is our new “AOR”

  8. JFCOM’s Transformation Engines Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Building tomorrow’s joint force today Joint Force Provider Joint Interoperability Integration Trained and Ready Forces today are the foundation for transformation for tomorrow Joint Force Trainer Integrating all enterprises to create coherent joint and combined capabilities

  9. Emerging Views to to to to to Information Age Terrorism and non-nation states Massed Effects Non-Linear Rapid initiation & termination Industrial Age Large heavy forces Massed forces Linearly Long Build Up Information Age Knowledge Enabled System understanding and analysis Collaboration Reach back Networked Precision

  10. Massed Forces Massed effects Deconflicted Integrated Interdependent Linearly – Sequential Simultaneous depth of space Attrition warfare Rapid start/stop Military to Military All elements of national power Independent Networked

  11. IRAQI FREEDOM in Context A Campaign of significant scope, scale, complexity and risk, and new capabilities OIF vs Desert Storm • Fewer land and air forces • Extensive use of SOF • First use of Land Component Commander • Robust Collaborative Planning Effort • Greater maneuver distances • Fewer Iraqi missile launches • Fewer oil wells set ablaze • Fewer munitions used • Reduced costs

  12. IRAQI FREEDOM in Context A Campaign of significant scope, scale, complexity and risk, and new capabilities Contributing Factors • Northern/Southern Watch--12 yr prep / 1 yr selected air interdiction • OEF Afghanistan Experience • Existing Component (Land, Sea, Air, SOF) & JTF HQ’s • Existing C2 facilities • Land and Sea prepositioned stocks • Lift improvements ($48B) • Greater bandwidth capability • Mission rehearsal exercises • Overmatching Power • Determined time and place of attack • Rapid Air and Sea supremacy • Precision fires; Speed and depth of maneuver

  13. Capabilities that reached new levels of performance, and need to be sustained and improved Joint Integration and Adaptive Planning Joint Force Synergy SOF and SOF-Conventional Integration Capabilities that demonstrated considerable effectiveness, but need enhancement Urban Operations Information Operations Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Capabilities that fell short of expectations or needs, and need to be redressed through new initiatives Battle Damage Assessment Fratricide Prevention Deployment Planning and Execution Reserve Mobilization Coalition Information Sharing Second-Tier Issues Joint Fires Time Sensitive Targeting Overmatching Strike Training Theater Logistics Public Affairs/Media Integration Shaping Interagency Involvement EUCOM/CENTCOM Seam Insights to future concepts Emerging Battlespace Knowledge-Enabled Warfare Effects-Based Operations The Big Issues – Quick Look

  14. Allied Command Transformation Vision NATO’s forcing agent for change, leading the continuous improvement of Alliance capabilities to uphold NATO’s global security interests

  15. Allied Command Transformation JFCOM Relationship • Cooperation and collaboration with NATO and Allies is vital and mutually beneficial – a two way street • Foundation for common understanding and transformation • Output and Outcome oriented • Dedicated & complementary organizations

  16. Allied Command Transformation JFCOM Near Term Effort • Share Joint Force Training model and lessons learned • NATO Response Force (NRF) Training • Multinational Concept Development and Experimentation • Two Way Street with Allies’ Ideas and Concepts

  17. Allied Command Long Term Priorities (draft) • Transform NATO’s military capabilities. • Prepare, support and sustain Alliance operations. • Implement NATO Response Force and other deployable capabilities. • Achieve ACT full operational capability. • Assist transformation of partner capabilities.

  18. FY 06 FY 05 FY 04 Joint Prototype Path Millennium Challenge 2002 Unified Vision 2001 Operational Lessons Learned Include our Combatant Commands, Services, Defense Agencies and Multinational partners; collaborate in experimentation activities Joint Concept Development Path FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Strategy • Field the Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ) – including the enabling concepts for developing transformational joint command and control • Deliver rapid, prototyping of capabilities to improve joint warfighting now FY 01 FY 03 FY 02 • Provide actionable recommendations from experimentation results to senior leaders to inform options for future force investments Joint Prototype Path Approach

  19. Thinking Skill Set Leadership Focus Processes _ Sustaining Disruptive Innovation Innovation Conventional S-Curve (Macro View) Product Performance Period of ‘Disruptive Innovation’ Purpose: Attain market dominance Method: Put current capability or technology out of business Conventional S-Curves (Micro View) Period of ‘Sustaining Innovation’ Purpose: Maintain Market Dominance Method: Continuous Product Improvement J9’s Focus t (or effort) Innovation What the “data” show (i.e, case studies) [Reference: The Innovator’s Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen]

  20. Delivering Innovation What prototypes should be embedded in training … and when? 4 What concepts become fielded capabilities? 3 2 What concepts become prototypes? 1 What concepts to develop?

  21. Main Points • The need to transform in a changing environment • Dedicated transformation organizations can accelerate change – if integrated and resourced • Transformation is comprehensive: all organizations and functions – military, interagency, and partner nations • Transformation incorporates doctrine,training, resources, employment & lessons learned – it is not just theoretical • Partnerships are essential and powerful Transformation is about Culture and Product

More Related