1 / 37

Assay Quality Considerations

Assay Quality Considerations. Christopher N. Greene, PhD. Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences NCEH, CDC Wednesday, 29th June 2011. National Center for Environmental Health . U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Major Topics.

pepper
Download Presentation

Assay Quality Considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assay Quality Considerations Christopher N. Greene, PhD Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences NCEH, CDC Wednesday, 29th June 2011 National Center for Environmental Health U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

  2. Major Topics • Regulatory guidelines • Documentation • Assay validation • Quality of reagents and controls • Positive and negative controls • Measures to prevent cross-contamination • Proficiency testing • Mutation nomenclature

  3. Laboratory Regulatory and Accreditation Guidelines • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): • approves kits and reagents for use in clinical testing • Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA): • Regulations passed by Congress1988 to establish quality standards for all laboratory testing to ensure the accuracy, reliability and timeliness of patient test results regardless of where the test was performed • College of American Pathologists (CAP): • Molecular Pathology checklist • State Specific Regulations

  4. Professional Guidelines • American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) • Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) • MM01-A2: Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Genetic Diseases • MM13-A: Collection, Transport, Preparation, and Storage of Specimens for Molecular Methods • MM14-A: Proficiency Testing (External Quality Assessment) for Molecular Methods • MM17-A: Verification and Validation of Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assays • MM19-P: Establishing Molecular Testing in Clinical Laboratory Environments

  5. Standard Operating Procedures Should Define Quality Controls: • Analytical Procedure • Specificity • Accuracy • Precision • Detection Limit • Range • Robustness • Validity Checks - controls

  6. Assay Validation - Background Choose and evaluate assay methodology Determining analytic performance of an assay involves: • Reviewing professional guidelines and relevant literature • Variables that must be monitored • Defining the limitations of the test • Specificity • Sensitivity • Reproducibility

  7. Assay Validation • Required for: • New testing methodology • Assay modification – includes cross-checks for different makes/models of instrumentation • Applies to: • FDA approved assays • Modified FDA assays • In-house methods • Standard published procedures

  8. Common Molecular Assay Problems and Trouble Shooting • Sample mix-ups • Temperature errors • Template/Sequence • PCR inhibitors • Buffer problems • Bad dNTPs • Bad primers • Bad enzyme

  9. Sample Tracking • Assign a unique code to each patient • Use two patient-identifiers at every step of the procedure • Develop worksheets and document every step

  10. Reagents • Labeling Reagents: • Content, quantity, concentration • Lot # • Storage requirements (temperature etc.) • Expiration date • Date of use/disposal • Know your critical reagents (enzymes, probes, digestion and electrophoresis buffers) and perform QC checks as appropriate

  11. Critical Molecular Assay Components • Nucleic Acids: Prepare aliquots appropriate to workflow to limit freeze-thaw cycles • Primers and probes • dNTPs • Genomic DNA • 4-8°C: Up to one year • -20°C: Up to seven years • Enzymes • Benchtop coolers recommended • Fluorescent reporters • Limit exposure to light • Amber storage tubes or wrap in shielding (foil)

  12. Documenting Primers and Probes • Oligonucleotide probes or primers • Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays • Reagent concentrations • Thermal cycler conditions • Sizes of PCR products for expected positive result • Results should document that the probe/primer used is consistent with the above data (i.e., a photograph indicating that the conditions used by the laboratory produce the appropriate result).

  13. Controls for Each Run Appropriate positive and negative controls should be included for each run of specimens being tested

  14. Molecular Assay Controls • Positive controls: • Inhibitors • Component failure • Interpretation of results • Sources: • Residual positive DBS • PT samples • QC materials through purchase or exchange • Negative controls: • Nucleic acid contamination

  15. Positive Controls Ideally should represent each target allele used in each run May not be feasible when: • Highly multiplex genotypes possible • Systematic rotation of different alleles as positives • Rare alleles • Heterozygous or compound heterozygous specimens

  16. Positive Controls • Assays based on presence or absence of product • Internal positive amplification controls to distinguish true negative from false due to failure of DNA extraction or PCR amplification • PCR amplification product of varying length • Specimens representing short and long amplification products to control for differential amplification • Quantitative PCR • Controls should represent more than one concentration • Control copy levels should be set to analytic cut-offs

  17. False Negative: ADO Allele drop-out (ADO): the failure of a molecular test to amplify or detect one or more alleles • Potential causes: • DNA template concentration • Incomplete cell lysis • DNA degradation • Non-optimized assay conditions • Unknown polymorphisms in target sites • Reagent component failure • Major concern for screening laboratories • Confirmation of mutation inheritance in families is not an option

  18. DNA Degradation • Lane 1 + 7: 1kb size standard ladder • Lane 2: 100ng control genomic DNA • Lanes 3-5: Crude cell lysates

  19. PCR Amplification Controls • Allele-specific amplification • Are there problems with this assay? • What additional controls would be useful? Allele 1 + 2 Allele 2 Allele 1 Reference Negative

  20. In Newborn Screening How can you control for presence of sufficient amount/quality of DNA for a PCR based test in a NBS lab?

  21. Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR Simultaneous amplification of: Positive amplification control Mutation allele Reference allele Alternative to tetra-primer ARMS is to include an additional primer set to amplify a different control sequence PCR with Internal Controls

  22. Allele Drop-out in PCR Testing 5’ Cgtgatgtacgaggttccat ggacatgatGcactacatgctccaaggtagtggag 5’ cctgtactaCgtgatgtacgaggttccat ggacatgatGcactacatgctccaaggtagtggag

  23. Allele Drop-out in PCR Testing 5’ Cgt gatgtacgaggttccat ggacatgatGcGctacatgctccaaggtagtggag SNP in primer site Cgtgatgtacgaggttccat 5’ ggacatgatGcGctacatgctccaaggtagtggag

  24. A G False Negatives: Deletions Forward Primer Forward Primer Reverse Primer Reverse Primer

  25. A G False Negatives: Deletions Forward Primer Forward Primer Reverse Primer Reverse Primer Deletion

  26. False Positives • Potential causes: • Non-optimized assay conditions • Unknown polymorphisms in target sites • Gene duplications • Oligonucleotidemis-priming at related sequences • Psuedogenes or gene families • Oligonucleotide concentrations too high • Nucleic acid cross-contamination

  27. Contamination Introduction of unwanted nucleic acids into specimen - the sensitivity of PCR techniques makes them vulnerable to contamination Repeated amplification of the same target sequence leads to accumulation of amplification products in the laboratory environment • A typical PCR generates as many as 109 copies of target sequence • Aerosols from pipettes will contain as many as 106 amplification products • Buildup of aerosolized amplification products will contaminate laboratory reagents, equipment, and ventilation systems

  28. Contamination: Mechanical Barriers • Unidirectional flow: • Reagent preparation area to the sample preparation area • Sample preparation area to the amplification area • Amplification area to the detection area These sites should be physically separated and at a substantial distance from each other • Each area should be equipped with the necessary instruments, disposable devices, laboratory coats, gloves, aerosol-free pipettes, and ventilation systems. All reagents and disposables used in each area delivered directly to that area. • The technologists must be alert to the possibility of transferring amplification products on their hair, glasses, jewelry and clothing from contaminated rooms to clean rooms

  29. PCR Containment Hood With built-in air-filters and UV sterilization lamp

  30. Contamination: Chemical and Enzymatic Barriers • Work stations should all be cleaned with 10% sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach), followed by removal of the bleach with ethanol. • Ultra-violet light irradiation • UV light induces thymidinedimers and other modifications that render nucleic acid inactive as a template for amplification • Enzymatic inactivation with uracil-N-glycosylase • Substitution of uracil (dUTP) for thymine (dTTP) during PCR amplification • New PCR sample reactions pre-treated with Uracil-N-glycosylase (UNG) – contaminating PCR amplicons are degraded leaving only genomic DNA available for PCR

  31. Contamination Checks • Wipe Test (monthly) • Negative Controls Real-time methods reduce the chance of contamination

  32. Proficiency Testing • Assessment of the Competence in Testing • Required for all CLIA/CAP certified laboratories • Performed twice a year • If specimens are not commercially available alternative proficiency testing program has to be established (specimen exchange etc.)

  33. Molecular Assay Proficiency Testing Material Sources • CDC NSQAP • UKNEQS • EuroGentest • CAP • Maine Molecular • SeraCare • Corielle • ECACC • In-house samples • Round-robin with other NBS laboratories

  34. Mutation Nomenclature • Uniform mutation nomenclature • Den Dunnen & Antonarakis (2001) Hum Genet 109:121-124 • Den Dunnen & Paalman (2003) Hum Mutat 22:181-82 • Human Genome Variation Society (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/) • Conventional notation should be retained for “established” clinical alleles

  35. Standard Nomenclature for Genes and Mutations Nucleotide numbering based on a coding DNA sequence Standard mutation nomenclature based on a coding DNA sequence Source: Ogino, et al (2007) J Mol Diagn 9:1-6

  36. Examples of Mutation Nomenclature: CFTR *Conventional CFTRexon/intron numbering includes exons 6a and 6b, exons 14a and 14b, and exons 17a and 17b; for exon/intron numbers in parentheses, these exon pairs are numbered sequentially without modifiers such as ′6a′ and ′6b.′

  37. Additional Sources

More Related