1 / 15

RELEVANCE

RELEVANCE. RELEVANCE. THE MOST BASIC ISSUE ALWAYS: IS THE EVIDENCE RELATED?. RELEVANCE. APPLICABLE STATUTES/RULES FRE 401-403 Evid. Code §§ 140, 210, 350-352. RELEVANCE. FRE 401: Evidence having: Any tendency To make the existence of any fact That is of consequence in the action

presta
Download Presentation

RELEVANCE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RELEVANCE

  2. RELEVANCE THE MOST BASIC ISSUE ALWAYS: • IS THE EVIDENCE RELATED?

  3. RELEVANCE APPLICABLE STATUTES/RULES • FRE 401-403 • Evid. Code §§ 140, 210, 350-352

  4. RELEVANCE • FRE 401: • Evidence having: • Any tendency • To make the existence of any fact • That is of consequence in the action • More or less probable • Than it would be without the evidence

  5. RELEVANCE • Evid. Code § 140 – defines evidence • Things offered to prove the existence or non-existence of a fact • Evid. Code § 210 – defines relevant evid. • Evid. Having any tendency to prove or disprove any DISPUTED fact of consequence in the action

  6. RELEVANCE • FRE 402 – Rule of Admissibility • All relevant evid. is admissible (except as otherwise provided by law) • Evid. Which is not relevant is not admissible

  7. RELEVANCE • Evid. Code § 350 • Only relevant evidence is admissible • Evid. Code § 351 • All relevant evidence is admissible (except as otherwise provided by law)

  8. RELEVANCE • WEIGHING – Probative v. Prejudice • True battleground on issues of relevance

  9. RELEVANCE • Court may exclude relevant evidence if: Probative value is substantially outweighed by: • Unfair prejudice; or • Undue consumption of time; or • Confusing the issues; or • Misleading the jury • FRE 403 & Evid. Code § 352

  10. RELEVANCE • Concept of Materiality • The evid. is directed at a proposition that is properly provable in the action • Materiality is framed by the pleadings and the controlling law

  11. RELEVANCE • HYPO # 1 – Assault case • A beats up B and is charged with assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury • Are any of these factors material: • Victim’s age, gender, size, ethnicity, sobriety • Same factors for defendant • Are these factors Relevant? Material?

  12. RELEVANCE • Hypo # 2: Mehserle case • Officer’s history of violence, racial animosity, criminal history, fatherhood • Victim’s history of violence, police animosity, criminal history, fatherhood • Is this type of evidence relevant? Is it material?

  13. RELEVANCE • HYPO #3 • MURDER IN SEPTEMBER – 2 Defendants • In January 2nd defendant arrested with a gun • Gun is not one of the murder weapons • Is this fact relevant? • Is this fact Material?

  14. RELEVANCE • HYPO #4 • DV event occurs in March – GF catches BF in bed with another woman: she attacks him and then he beats her more than necessary to defend himself • Both parties want to put in evidence re: key, which in turn requires evidence of nature of relationship • Relevant? Material?

  15. RELEVANCE • HYPO #5 • Homicide in April – GF kills BF – claims gun accidentally discharged/his presence unknown • She say argued earlier over kiss IFO 10 yr old • Prior Halloween costume in car photos • Relevant? • Material?

More Related