1 / 33

Fricatives, part 2

Fricatives, part 2. November 20, 2013. Down the Stretch They Come. Today: fricatives and fricative acoustics… Formant plotting + vowel production exercises is due at 5 pm today! I will post production exercise #4 after I’ve received everybody’s vowels.

radley
Download Presentation

Fricatives, part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fricatives, part 2 November 20, 2013

  2. Down the Stretch They Come • Today: fricatives and fricative acoustics… • Formant plotting + vowel production exercises is due at 5 pm today! • I will post production exercise #4 after I’ve received everybody’s vowels. • This Friday: fricative spectrograms!

  3. Fricative Place of Articulation • A fricative’s place of articulation is where, in the vocal tract, its turbulence noise is made. • Fricatives may be produced at essentially any place of articulation. • At different places of articulation, fricatives will have: • Different filters • based on the area and shape of the vocal tract in front of the obstruction of the airflow • Different sound sources • based on the flow of air through the obstruction

  4. Glottals, Epiglottals,and Pharyngeals • Glottal fricatives: [h] • Epiglottal fricatives: • Pharyngeal fricatives: • Note: try not to confuse the symbols for the: • voiced epiglottal fricative • voiceless epiglottal stop • And also not the symbols for the: • voiced pharyngeal fricative • glottal stop

  5. Agul • Glottals, epiglottals and pharyngeals contrast in the Caucasian language Agul.

  6. Uvular Fricatives

  7. Uvular Fricative Symbols • Peter says: • Uvular fricatives contrast with pharyngeals and glottals in one dialect of Hebrew.

  8. Palatals and Velars

  9. Palatal and Velar Symbols <-- Peter says • Possible confusion #1: • voiceless palatal fricative [ç] • voiceless palatal stop [c] • Possible confusion #2: • voiced palatal fricative • voiced palatal stop • Possible confusion #3:

  10. Greek

  11. Coronal Fricatives Peter says: • The coronal fricative landscape is very complex. • Next time we’ll look in detail at how coronal fricatives are produced in: • English • Chinese • Polish

  12. Toda Toda is spoken in southern India.

  13. Toda Mid-Sagittal Diagrams

  14. Bilabial Fricatives • Bilabial fricatives exist allophonically in some languages (e.g., Spanish) • They were not recognized as a potentially contrastive sound until relatively recently (‘70s or ‘80s) • it was discovered that they contrasted with labio-dental fricatives in Ewe, a language spoken in Ghana.

  15. Ewe

  16. Turbulence Sources • For fricatives, turbulence is generated by forcing a stream of air at high velocity through either a narrow channel in the vocal tract or against an obstacle in the vocal tract. • Channel turbulence • produced when airflow escapes from a narrow channel and hits inert outside air • Obstacle turbulence • produced when airflow hits an obstacle in its path

  17. Obstacles, Channels, Walls • General rule of thumb: obstacle turbulence is much noisier than channel turbulence • [f] vs. • Also: obstacle turbulence is louder, the more perpendicular the obstacle is to the airflow • [s] vs. [x] • [x] is a “wall fricative” • Rule of thumb: voiced fricatives are hard to make. • In fact, fricatives are kind of hard to make in general.

  18. Fricatives = difficult • Fricatives require great articulatory precision. • it’s necessary to create a narrow channel through which air can flow. • (and hold it) • ballistic vs. controlled articulations • Some data for [s]: (Subtelny et al., 1972) • alveolar constriction  1 mm • incisor constriction  2-3 mm • Larger constriction sizes result in -like sounds • Also: voiced fricatives are even more difficult • Why?

  19. Some Typology • Languages with the following number of fricatives • From the UPSID database (total of 316 languages) • Voiceless Voiced Voiced/Voiceless • [s] 266 [z] 96 0.36 • 146 51 0.34 • [f] 135 [v] 67 0.50 • [x] 75 40 0.53 • 29 13 0.45 • 21 32 1.52 • 18 21 1.16

  20. Some Typology • Languages with the following number of fricatives • From the UPSID database (total of 316 languages) • Voiceless Voiced Voiced/Voiceless • 21 32 1.52 • 18 21 1.16 • 17 3 0.17 • [ç] 16 7 0.43 • 13 9 0.69

  21. Aerodynamics • Note: voiced fricatives have two sound sources. • one at the glottis • one at the fricative constriction • In voicing, air rushes through the glottis in short, regular bursts • Glottis is closed part of the time •  Difficult to maintain a steady stream of flowing air at the fricative constriction. •  Frication (second source) can be lost

  22. vs. [s] [z]

  23. Some More Typology # of Fricatives # of languages % of total 0 21 6.6% 1 37 11.7% 2 62 19.6% 3 47 14.8% 4 37 11.7% 5 26 8.2% 6 28 8.8% 7 19 6.0% 8 20 6.3% > 8 22 6.4%

  24. Fricative Fun Facts • Of the 21 languages without any fricatives, 15 are Australian languages • Hawaiian is another example • Australian languages also tend to lack affricates • But remember: many Australian languages have five or more place contrasts for stops. • Kabardian has the most fricatives: 22 • Kabardian also has 2 (count ‘em) vowels • Languages with one fricative: [s] • Languages with two fricatives: [s], or [s], [f] • Languages with three fricatives: [s], , [f]

  25. Sibilants • [s] and are known as sibilant fricatives • Sibilants have more acoustic energy at higher frequencies than other fricatives • Two reasons why: • they are obstacle fricatives • = the back of the upper teeth •  louder than other fricatives • small, short resonating filter • = between constriction and the lips •  higher frequencies resonate

  26. [s] vs. [f] “sigh” “fie” • Note: acoustic energy for [f] is weaker, and spread more evenly across all frequencies

  27. vs. “shy” “thigh”

  28. vs. [s] “sigh” “shy”

  29. Acoustic Enhancement • Note: is post-alveolar and [s] is alveolar •  more space in vocal tract in front of • including a “sub-lingual cavity” • This “filter” of resonates at lower frequencies • In English, this acoustic distinction is enhanced through lip rounding for • this extends the vocal tract • further lowers the resonant frequencies of

  30. The Sub-lingual Cavity • Let’s check the videotape...

  31. Behind the Constriction [s] • Let’s check the ultrasound…

More Related