1 / 24

Overview

This overview covers the Internet Protocol (IP) and its datagram format, IP fragmentation, ICMP protocol, NAT, routing in the Internet, intra-AS and inter-AS routing, and multicast routing.

rauls
Download Presentation

Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview • The Internet (IP) Protocol • Datagram format • IP fragmentation • ICMP: Internet Control Message Protocol • NAT: Network Address Translation • Routing in the Internet • Intra-AS routing: RIP and OSPF • Inter-AS routing: BGP • Multicast Routing Some slides are in courtesy of J. Kurose and K. Ross

  2. host part network part 11001000 0001011100010000 00000000 200.23.16.0/23 IP addressing: CIDR • Classful addressing: • inefficient use of address space, address space exhaustion • e.g., class B net allocated enough addresses for 65K hosts, even if only 2K hosts in that network • CIDR:Classless InterDomain Routing • network portion of address of arbitrary length • address format: a.b.c.d/x, where x is # bits in network portion of address

  3. 200.23.16.0/23 200.23.18.0/23 200.23.30.0/23 200.23.20.0/23 . . . . . . Hierarchical addressing: route aggregation Hierarchical addressing allows efficient advertisement of routing information: Organization 0 Organization 1 “Send me anything with addresses beginning 200.23.16.0/20” Organization 2 Fly-By-Night-ISP Internet Organization 7 “Send me anything with addresses beginning 199.31.0.0/16” ISPs-R-Us

  4. 200.23.16.0/23 200.23.18.0/23 200.23.30.0/23 200.23.20.0/23 . . . . . . Hierarchical addressing: more specific routes ISPs-R-Us has a more specific route to Organization 1 Organization 0 “Send me anything with addresses beginning 200.23.16.0/20” Organization 2 Fly-By-Night-ISP Internet Organization 7 “Send me anything with addresses beginning 199.31.0.0/16 or 200.23.18.0/23” ISPs-R-Us Organization 1

  5. IP protocol version number 32 bits total datagram length (bytes) header length (bytes) type of service head. len ver length for fragmentation/ reassembly fragment offset “type” of data flgs 16-bit identifier max number remaining hops (decremented at each router) upper layer time to live Internet checksum 32 bit source IP address 32 bit destination IP address upper layer protocol to deliver payload to E.g. timestamp, record route taken, specify list of routers to visit. Options (if any) data (variable length, typically a TCP or UDP segment) IP datagram format how much overhead with TCP? • 20 bytes of TCP • 20 bytes of IP • = 40 bytes + app layer overhead

  6. network links have MTU (max.transfer size) - largest possible link-level frame. different link types, different MTUs large IP datagram divided (“fragmented”) within net one datagram becomes several datagrams “reassembled” only at final destination IP header bits used to identify, order related fragments IP Fragmentation & Reassembly fragmentation: in: one large datagram out: 3 smaller datagrams reassembly

  7. length =1500 length =1500 length =4000 length =1040 ID =x ID =x ID =x ID =x fragflag =0 fragflag =1 fragflag =1 fragflag =0 offset =0 offset =0 offset =370 offset =185 One large datagram becomes several smaller datagrams IP Fragmentation and Reassembly Example • 4000 byte datagram • MTU = 1500 bytes 1480 bytes in data field offset = 1480/8

  8. used by hosts, routers, gateways to communication network-level information error reporting: unreachable host, network, port, protocol echo request/reply (used by ping) network-layer “above” IP: ICMP msgs carried in IP datagrams Ping, traceroute uses ICMP ICMP: Internet Control Message Protocol

  9. IP datagram: A E B source IP addr misc fields dest IP addr data 223.1.1.1 223.1.2.1 223.1.1.2 223.1.2.9 223.1.1.4 223.1.2.2 223.1.1.3 223.1.3.27 Dest. Net. next router Nhops 223.1.1 1 223.1.3.2 223.1.3.1 223.1.2 223.1.1.4 2 223.1.3 223.1.1.4 2 Getting a datagram from source to dest. forwarding table in A • datagram remains unchanged, as it travels source to destination • addr fields of interest here

  10. B E A 223.1.1.1 223.1.2.1 223.1.1.2 223.1.2.9 223.1.1.4 223.1.2.2 223.1.1.3 223.1.3.27 Dest. Net. next router Nhops 223.1.1 1 223.1.3.2 223.1.3.1 223.1.2 223.1.1.4 2 223.1.3 223.1.1.4 2 Getting a datagram from source to dest. forwarding table in A misc fields data 223.1.1.1 223.1.1.3 Starting at A, send IP datagram addressed to B: • look up net. address of B in forwarding table • find B is on same net. as A • link layer will send datagram directly to B inside link-layer frame • B and A are directly connected

  11. E A B 223.1.1.1 223.1.2.1 223.1.1.2 223.1.2.9 223.1.1.4 223.1.2.2 223.1.1.3 223.1.3.27 Dest. Net. next router Nhops 223.1.1 1 223.1.3.2 223.1.3.1 223.1.2 223.1.1.4 2 223.1.3 223.1.1.4 2 Getting a datagram from source to dest. forwarding table in A misc fields data 223.1.1.1 223.1.2.3 Starting at A, dest. E: • look up network address of E in forwarding table • E on different network • A, E not directly attached • routing table: next hop router to E is 223.1.1.4 • link layer sends datagram to router 223.1.1.4 inside link-layer frame • datagram arrives at 223.1.1.4 • continued…..

  12. Dest. Net router Nhops interface B A E 223.1.1 - 1 223.1.1.4 223.1.2 - 1 223.1.2.9 223.1.3 - 1 223.1.3.27 223.1.1.1 223.1.2.1 223.1.1.2 223.1.2.9 223.1.1.4 223.1.2.2 223.1.1.3 223.1.3.27 223.1.3.2 223.1.3.1 Getting a datagram from source to dest. forwarding table in router misc fields data 223.1.1.1 223.1.2.3 Arriving at 223.1.4, destined for 223.1.2.2 • look up network address of E in router’s forwarding table • E on same network as router’s interface 223.1.2.9 • router, E directly attached • link layer sends datagram to 223.1.2.2 inside link-layer frame via interface 223.1.2.9 • datagram arrives at 223.1.2.2!!! (hooray!)

  13. NAT: Network Address Translation rest of Internet local network (e.g., home network) 10.0.0/24 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.4 10.0.0.2 138.76.29.7 10.0.0.3 Datagrams with source or destination in this network have 10.0.0/24 address for source, destination (as usual) All datagrams leaving local network have same single source NAT IP address: 138.76.29.7, different source port numbers

  14. NAT: Network Address Translation • Motivation: local network uses just one IP address as far as outside word is concerned: • no need to be allocated range of addresses from ISP: - just one IP address is used for all devices • can change addresses of devices in local network without notifying outside world • can change ISP without changing addresses of devices in local network • devices inside local net not explicitly addressable, visible by outside world (a security plus).

  15. NAT: Network Address Translation Implementation: NAT router must: • outgoing datagrams:replace (source IP address, port #) of every outgoing datagram to (NAT IP address, new port #) . . . remote clients/servers will respond using (NAT IP address, new port #) as destination addr. • remember (in NAT translation table) every (source IP address, port #) to (NAT IP address, new port #) translation pair • incoming datagrams:replace (NAT IP address, new port #) in dest fields of every incoming datagram with corresponding (source IP address, port #) stored in NAT table

  16. 3 1 2 4 S: 10.0.0.1, 3345 D: 128.119.40.186, 80 S: 138.76.29.7, 5001 D: 128.119.40.186, 80 1: host 10.0.0.1 sends datagram to 128.119.40, 80 2: NAT router changes datagram source addr from 10.0.0.1, 3345 to 138.76.29.7, 5001, updates table S: 128.119.40.186, 80 D: 10.0.0.1, 3345 S: 128.119.40.186, 80 D: 138.76.29.7, 5001 NAT: Network Address Translation NAT translation table WAN side addr LAN side addr 138.76.29.7, 5001 10.0.0.1, 3345 …… …… 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.4 10.0.0.2 138.76.29.7 10.0.0.3 4: NAT router changes datagram dest addr from 138.76.29.7, 5001 to 10.0.0.1, 3345 3: Reply arrives dest. address: 138.76.29.7, 5001

  17. NAT: Network Address Translation • 16-bit port-number field: • 60,000 simultaneous connections with a single LAN-side address! • NAT is controversial: • routers should only process up to layer 3 • violates end-to-end argument • NAT possibility must be taken into account by app designers, eg, P2P applications • address shortage should instead be solved by IPv6

  18. Overview • The Internet (IP) Protocol • Datagram format • IP fragmentation • ICMP: Internet Control Message Protocol • NAT: Network Address Translation • Routing in the Internet • Intra-AS routing: RIP and OSPF • Inter-AS routing: BGP • Multicast Routing Some slides are in courtesy of J. Kurose and K. Ross

  19. Architecture of Dynamic Routing IGP EGP (= BGP) AS 1 IGP IGP = Interior Gateway Protocol Metric based: OSPF, IS-IS, RIP, EIGRP (cisco) AS 2 EGP = Exterior Gateway Protocol Policy based: BGP The Routing Domain of BGP is the entire Internet

  20. Link State Vectoring OSPF RIP IGP IS-IS BGP EGP The Gang of Four Used in upper-tier ISPs Lower-tier ISPs and enterprise networks

  21. OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) • “open”: publicly available • Uses Link State algorithm • LS packet dissemination • Topology map at each node • Route computation using Dijkstra’s algorithm • OSPF advertisement carries one entry per neighbor router (per link) • Advertisements disseminated to entire AS (via flooding) • Periodically broadcast even when there is no link cost change • Carried in OSPF messages directly over IP (rather than TCP or UDP

  22. OSPF “advanced” features (not in RIP) • Security: all OSPF messages authenticated (to prevent malicious intrusion) • Multiple same-cost paths allowed (only one path in RIP) • Integrated uni- and multicast support: • Multicast OSPF (MOSPF) uses same topology data base as OSPF • Hierarchical OSPF in large domains.

  23. Hierarchical OSPF

  24. Hierarchical OSPF • Two-level hierarchy: local area, backbone. • Link-state advertisements only in area • each nodes has detailed area topology; only know direction (shortest path) to nets in other areas. • Area border routers:“summarize” distances to nets in own area, advertise to other Area Border routers. • Backbone routers: run OSPF routing limited to backbone. • Boundary routers: connect to other AS’s.

More Related