1 / 40

INTRODUCTION TO MICROECONOMICS

INTRODUCTION TO MICROECONOMICS. Graphs and Tables Part #3. Figure VI-1.1: An Increase in Demand in a Constant Cost Industry, Part 1. P. 1. Start at P = P LR , Π = 0. S SR. S LR. $20. D. Q. 100K . The Market. Figure VI-1.2: An Increase in Demand in a Constant Cost Industry, Part 2.

rue
Download Presentation

INTRODUCTION TO MICROECONOMICS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INTRODUCTION TO MICROECONOMICS Graphs and Tables Part #3

  2. Figure VI-1.1: An Increase in Demand in a Constant Cost Industry, Part 1 P • 1. Start at P = PLR, Π = 0 SSR SLR $20 D Q 100K The Market

  3. Figure VI-1.2: An Increase in Demand in a Constant Cost Industry, Part 2 P • Start at P = PLR, Π = 0 • Increase in Demand • 3. P > PLR, Π > 0 causes entry. SSR $25 SLR $20 D Q 100K 105K The Market

  4. Figure VI-1.3: An Increase in Demand in a Constant Cost Industry P • For an increase in demand: • Start at P = PLR, Π = 0 • Increase demand • P > PLR, Π > 0 causes entry. • Entry causes S to increase until P = PLR • and Π = 0 SSR S’SR $25 SLR $20 D’ D Q 100K 105K110K The Market

  5. Figure VI-2: An Increase in Demand in an Increasing Cost Industry S P S’ • For an increase in demand: • Start at P = PLR, Π = 0 • Increase demand • P > PLR, Π > 0 causes entry. • Entry causes S to increase. • 5. So costs to increase and • P decreases until P = PLRand Π = 0 (back in LR equilibrium). SLR $35 $30 $20 D’ D Q 100K 105K110K The Market

  6. Figure VI-3: An Increase in Demand in a Constant Cost Industry with Legal Entry Barriers P S • For an increase in demand: • Start at P = PLR, Π = 0 • Increase demand • P > PLR, Π > 0 but no entry occurs because of entry barriers. Π remains positive. $25 SLR $20 D’ D Q 100K 105K110K The Market

  7. Explanation of Figure VI-3 • (1) Entry restrictions imposed when firm is in LR equilibrium (has no effect at that point). • (2) An increase in market demand occurs because income increases or population growth occurs. • (3) Increased demand causes an increase in the market price which creates positive profits (P > PLR). • (4) Positive profits would cause new entry but new entry cannot occur because of the legal entry barriers. These legal entry barriers create a Welfare Loss as seen in Figure VI-4 (because the supply curve cannot increase).

  8. Figure VI-4: An Increase in Demand in a Constant Cost Industry with Legal Entry Barriers P S • Welfare Loss Analysis: • Entry barriers mean that consumers lose the extra CS (Areas 1, 2, and 3) that would arise from entry and price falling to $20. • Because of entry barriers, producers gain Areas 1 and 2 as PS. • Welfare loss or net loss is Area 3. S’ $25 2 1 3 SLR $20 D’ D Q 100K 105K110K The Market

  9. Table VI-1: Statistics on US Farms, 1982 Source: USDA, Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector, 1982

  10. Table VI-2: Statistics on US Farms, 1982 Source: USDA, Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector, 1982

  11. Table VI-3: Statistics on US Farms, 1985

  12. Source for Table VI-3: E.C. Pasour, Agriculture and the State, Independent Institute, 1990, p. 65

  13. Table VI-4: Farm Production by Size Class, 2001

  14. Source: EC Pasour and Randal Rucker, Plowshares and Pork Barrels, Independent Institute, 2005, p. 77.

  15. Figure VI-5: The Instability of Farm Income Drought Year: TR = $4B Regular Year: TR = $3.6B Bumper Crop: TR = $1.6B S1 S0 S2 P D0 $10 $6 $2 QWHEAT 400M 600M 800M

  16. Table VI-6: The Market for Wheat with Price Support

  17. Figure VI-6: The Market for Wheat with Price Supports DPVT + USDA P S $26 ES PSUP = $14 $10 DPVT $2 Q 60 80 120 Consumers pay $14(60) = $840 USDA pays $14(60) = $840

  18. Table VI-7:The Market for Wheat with Price Supports and Production Controls (PC)

  19. Figure VI-7: The Market for Wheat with Price Supports and Production Controls S’ P S ES $26 PSUP = $14 $10 DPVT + USDA $2 DPVT Q 60 70 80 Consumers pay $14(60) = $840 USDA pays $14(10) = $140

  20. Table VI-8: Target Prices

  21. Figure VI-8: The Market for Wheat with a Target Price P $26 S PTAR = $14 $10 DPVT $2 Q 80 120 • Consumers Pay Farmers $2(120) = $240 • USDA Pays Farmers ($14-$2)(120) = $1,440

  22. Figure VI-9: The Welfare Loss in a Market for Wheat with a Target Price P $26 S PG PTAR = $14 $10 WL DPVT $2 Q 80 120 CG

  23. Explanation of Figure VI-9 • PG = Producers’ Gain • Producers’ Gain is the difference between the Producers’ Surplus (PS’) with the subsidy and the Producers’ Surplus (PS) without the subsidy • PS’ = ½ bh = ½(120)($14-$2) = $720 • PS = ½ (80)($10-$2) = $320 • So PG = PS’ – PS = $400

  24. Explanation of Figure VI-9 • CG = Consumers’ Gain • Consumers’ Gain is the difference between the Consumers’ Surplus (CS’) with the subsidy and the Consumers’ Surplus (CS) without the subsidy • CS’ = ½ bh = ½(120)($26-$2) = $1440 • CS = ½ (80)($26-$10) = $640 • So CG = CS’ – CS = $800

  25. Explanation of Figure VI-9 • CG = CS’ – CS = $800 • PG = PS’ – PS = $400 • Cost of Subsidy = (120)($14-$2) = $1440 • Total Gains = PG + CG = $1200 • Total Gains – Cost of Subsidy = Welfare Loss • WL = $1200 - $1440 = - $240

  26. Figure VI-10a: Effect of Price Supports in the Short-Run SSR P DSR SLR ESSR PSUP Short-Run Cost To USDA P0 DLR Q

  27. Figure VI-10b: Effect of Price Supports in the Long-Run SSR S’SR P DSR SLR ESLR PSUP Long-Run Cost To USDA P0 DLR Q

  28. Explanation of Figure VI-10b • (1) Since PSUP > PLR, existing firms will now have positive profits. • (2) That will attract new entry. New entry will cause costs to rise (increasing cost industry) but prices do not fall because of the price floor. • (3) New entry continues until costs have risen enough to reduce profits equal to zero. (This occurs at PSUP.) • (4) Cost of price supports is larger in the LR than the SR.

  29. Table VI-9: Size of Farm and Government Payments, 2001

  30. Source: EC Pasour and Randal Rucker, Plowshares and Pork Barrels, Independent Institute, 2005, p. 81.

  31. Table VII-1.1: Changes in Market Concentration for Dominant Firms Over Time

  32. Table VII-1.2: Dominant Firms and Market Share Over Time

  33. Table VII-1.1: Average and Marginal Revenue for a Monopolist/Price Searcher P $10 ED > 1 ED = 1 $5 ED < 1 D = AR Q 50 100 MR

  34. Explanation of Figure VII-1.1 • (1) From the average-marginal relationship we note that the AR is falling (the downward-sloping demand curve) so the MR must be below it. • (2) Note that as P decreases in the elastic portion of the demand curve, TR increases so MR is positive. When P decreases in the inelastic portion of the demand curve, TR falls so MR is negative. Thus MR = 0 when TR a maximum at the unit elastic point. • (3) MR curve divides a line from the vertical axis to the demand curve in half.

  35. Figure VII-1.2: Cost Curves of the Firm LRAC $ LRMC QMES Q

  36. Figure VII-1.3: Profit-Maximizing Firm LRAC $ LRMC Π > 0 Pm D MR Q Qm

  37. Figure VII-1.4: Monopolist/Price-Searcher Earns Negative Profits P LRMC LRAC Π < 0 ATC AR =Pm D = AR MR Q Qm

  38. Explanation of Figure VII-1.4 • (1) Pm < LRAC(Qm) and Pm < ATCm • (2) Π = TR – TC = Q(AR –ATC) < 0 • (3) Π < 0 and exit in the LR occurs . • (4) In a constant cost industry, exit will cause an increase in demand because remaining firms will have a bigger share of the market. • (5) Demand increases until the demand curve is just tangent to the LRAC. Since Pm = LRAC(Qm) now Π = 0 and exit ceases.

  39. Figure VII-1.5: Inefficiency and Price Searchers P LRMC LRAC WL Pm Pc D = AR MR Q Qc Qm

  40. Explanation of Figure VII-1.5 • (1) Π = 0 so price searcher in LR equilibrium • (2) Inefficient because Pm > LRMC(Qm)? • (3) But this is as good as it gets.

More Related