1 / 32

Optical imaging of the mesosphere and ionosphere

Optical imaging of the mesosphere and ionosphere. Jonathan J. Makela (University of Illinois). Overview. Imaging as a remote sensing tool Estimating GW parameters in the mesosphere Observing structure and inferring pertinent parameters in the thermosphere/ionosphere

salene
Download Presentation

Optical imaging of the mesosphere and ionosphere

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Optical imaging of the mesosphere and ionosphere Jonathan J. Makela (University of Illinois)

  2. Overview • Imaging as a remote sensing tool • Estimating GW parameters in the mesosphere • Observing structure and inferring pertinent parameters in the thermosphere/ionosphere • Airglow emissions of interest • Parameter estimation techniques • Deployment considerations Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  3. Why Imaging? • Many methods exist to probe the upper atmosphere. Imaging provides several advantages over other techniques: • Large coverage area from a single site (650  650 km in mesosphere; 1750  1750 in thermosphere) • High spatial resolution (< km in mesosphere; ~km in thermosphere) • Good temporal resolution (~90 s  # filters used) Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  4. Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  5. Why Not Imaging? • As with any observing method, there are also disadvantages, including: • Passive technique (rely on what Mother Nature gives us) • Measuring (height) integrated quantities • Difficulty in obtaining absolute quantities • Requirement of dark/clear skies There are many applications where the pros outweigh the cons and imaging is an appropriate technique to probe the upper atmosphere Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  6. Airglow • Chemilluminescent processes • Chemistry determines altitude a given emission occurs at • Perturbations to the medium (AGWs, TIDs, etc) can modify the chemistry and are therefore observed as changes in emission intensity • Visible from the ground with sensitive CCD cameras Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  7. Prominent Airglows in Mesosphere • OH (Hydroxyl) • Peak altitude ~88 km • Broad band emission (770 – 2000 nm) • Bright! • O2 (Molecular Oxygen) • Peak altitude ~94 km • Narrow band emission (860 – 870 nm) • Na (Sodium) • Peak altitude ~94 Km • Metal caused by meteor ablation • Used for resonance lidar • OI (Atomic oxygen: Green Line) • Peak altitude ~98 km • Atomic line emission (557.7 nm) • Weakest of the three but most visible to human eye Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  8. Atmospheric Gravity Waves • Transverse buoyancy waves • Transport energy across different regions of the atmosphere (one of the largest sources through mesospshere) • Perturbations modify mesospheric airglow emission intensities and can thus be imaged • Pertinent parameters to know include: • Wave number (kh and kz) • Intrinsic wave frequency (i) • Amplitude or perturbation (A or ’/ ) Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  9. Airglow Layer Single-Layer/Single-Site Observation • Provides horizontal wave numbers and “true” frequency • No vertical wavelength • No intrinsic frequency • Need wind or vertical wavelength • No amplitude • Requires vertical wavelength Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  10. Airglow Layers Multi-Layer/Single Site Observation • Vertical wavelength can be estimated by comparing phases in two different layers • Assumes known heights of layers • Problems: • Wave does not always show up in two layers • Potential for 2 ambiguity Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  11. Airglow Layer Single-Layer/Multi-Site Observation • Provides multiple-angle observations of the same perturbation • Obtain z through standard tomography, tomography of Fourier Descriptors, or Parameter Estimation • Ph.D. work of D. Scott Anderson • Examined these techniques and their suitability to retrieving estimates of z Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  12. Parameter Estimation • If the goal of measurements is to infer a few parameters of AGWs, full-blown tomography is unnecessary • Parameter estimation can be performed using multi-site observations and an appropriate forward model without requiring the complexity of tomographic inversion • Significantly reduces computational requirements and improves end results Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  13. Data Model • Giis the result of a Gabor filter (a complex band pass filter) on the mapped pixel intensity data which selects the horizontal wavelength to be modeled where Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  14. Phase Analysis (PE-Phase) • If the layer centroid, zc, is assumed to be known this simplifies to a two-unknown problem • Vertical wave number, kz, obtained from single-site observations of multiple layers • Layer centroid obtainable from multi-site observations of a single layer • Observed frequency, t, is obtained from time sequence of images Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  15. Amplitude Analysis (PE-mag) • Amplitude of wave perturbation, A(x,y), obtained if imaging systems are well calibrated • Layer thickness, , and vertical wave number, kz, obtainable • Requires multi-site observations of a single (or multiple) layer(s) Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  16. OH and OI imager OH and OI imager Na lidar OH and OI imager Example Experimental Campaign Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  17. Campaign Results • Several wave packets observed in the different imagers • Basic parameters obtained from the raw images alone Wave 1 Wave 2 Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  18. Campaign Results • Using the PE-phase technique, parameters are estimated • 2 phase ambiguity leads to two solutions • Calculating winds from the dispersion relation tells us which direction is correct Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  19. Campaign Results • Collocated Na lidar measurements at UAO site confirm downward phase propagation Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  20. Considerations • PE-phase contains a 2 ambiguity • Can be mitigated by using the dispersion relation • Observing additional emission layers would also help on this front • PE-mag (not shown) is heavily dependent on proper absolute calibration of each imager • Difficult to do as unknown atmospheric extinction is non-negligible and non-uniform • Can partially be mitigated by fitting PE-mag results to PE-phase results (for kz) Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  21. Prominent Airglows in Thermosphere/Ionosphere • Dissociative Recombination of O2+ • Peak emission below the F peak • Narrow band emission (630.0 nm) • Chemistry depends on both electron and neutral densities • Long lifetime (~110 s) can cause blurring of features • Radiative Recombination of O+ • Peak emission at the F peak • Narrow band emission (777.4 nm) • Assuming an O+ plasma, intensity is proportional to ne2 • Prompt emission (no blurring) • Very dim emission Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  22. Ionospheric “Topography” • Using the combination of the height-dependent 630.0-nm emission and density-dependent 777.4-nm emission can give estimates of F-layer altitude and density Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  23. Example from 15-16 Sept 1999 Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  24. Example from 15-16 Sept 1999 Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  25. Example from 15-16 Sept 1999 • “Bands” in radar data caused by gradients in electron density; higher densities to the south • Increase in density slightly before local midnight • F layer is observed to decrease in altitude over time Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  26. F-Region Pedersen Conductivity • Important parameter for understanding: • E- and F-region coupling • Instability processes (e.g., Perkins instability at mid-latitudes) • 630.0-nm volume emission rate is similar to the equation for Pedersen conductivity • Both can be shown to have dependence on ne and O2 • 630.0-nm intensity is proportional to PF Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  27. Pedersen Airglow Technique • Technique allows estimation of F-region Pedersen airglow over a large area (10001000 km) • Based on modeling study, RMS difference of 0.271 mhos is expected (0.172 mhos if layer altitude is known) Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  28. Comparison to ISR-derived PF • Technique validated against estimates of PF derived from the Arecibo ISR • Estimates were very good, especially given knowledge of the F-layer altitude Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  29. Example During Mid-Latitude Event • Evolution of structure at mid-latitudes typically understood as Perkins’ instabilities • Depends on variations in conductivities associated with altitude variations of the F layer that align from NWSE Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  30. Possibilities for Technique Improvements • Uncertainties in techniques from: • Reliance on (climatological) background models • Imperfectly known absolute calibration and systematic factors (e.g., flat-fielding) • Unknown atmospheric extinction • Improvements can be gained by either using better models (e.g., assimilative models) or actually integrating images as an assimilated data source • Initial work being performed to integrate into IDA4D Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  31. Deployment Requirements • Dark skies that are typically clear from cloud cover • Availability of • power • facility for housing instrument • Internet connectivity • For PE technique, need multiple sites separated by 100-120 km viewing a common volume Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

  32. Summary • Imaging of the mesosphere and thermosphere/ionosphere can lead to estimates of parameters important for understanding coupling processes • Provide observations of spatiotemporal dynamics over a large area • Integrating images into assimilative models may resolve some of the short comings of current parameter estimation techniques Lightning-Ionosphere Coupling Workshop, LANL

More Related