1 / 16

Understanding climate impacts on vulnerable people

Sarah Lindley, University of Manchester. Understanding climate impacts on vulnerable people. Local Health and Wellbeing in a changing climate, Nottingham Friday 1 st March 2013. Justice, vulnerability and climate change

sammy
Download Presentation

Understanding climate impacts on vulnerable people

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sarah Lindley, University of Manchester Understanding climate impacts on vulnerable people Local Health and Wellbeing in a changing climate, Nottingham Friday 1st March 2013 Justice, vulnerability and climate change Full report available at http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/climate-change-justice-and-vulnerability

  2. Vulnerability • How external stresses impact on well-being. • A lower ability to respond to stresses placed on well-being  higher vulnerability. • The central question: how is vulnerability distributed across different individuals and groups? • Likelihood and severity of the weather related event – flood, heatwave. • Vulnerability: The conversion of the event into welfare impacts (individual, social and environmental) • Climate disadvantage is a function of 1 and 2. • The characterisation of vulnerability raises: • How should well-being be conceptualised and measured? • What factors are relevant to understanding how external stresses convert into changes in well-being?

  3. Socio-spatial vulnerability • Geographical expression of the potential for an event to convert into the loss of wellbeing • Dimensions reveal a different picture and requires different actions Ability to prepare Exposure (Enhanced) Sensitivity Adaptive capacity Ability to respond Ability to recover Vulnerability Exposure • But understanding related climate disadvantage requires consideration of the potential for contact with a flood or heat-related event too Climate disadvantage Hazard

  4. Socio-spatial flood/heat vulnerability domains

  5. Socio-spatial flood vulnerability in England Coastal Built-up areas, basement dwellings e.g. possible insurance access issues

  6. *Land area with significant or moderate flood likelihoods(EA) English mean = 8.4% NB: NOT properties exposed

  7. Both neighbourhoods have relatively low adaptive capacity • East has population & local physical characteristics close to English norm • West has less sensitive population but a local environment which can enhance flood exposure

  8. Selected indicators – L’boro E • Physical characteristics balance out to English norm • Proportions of basement dwellings above average (5.1% compared to 2.6%) • but not as built up as the average English neighbourhood taken as a whole • Sensitivity around average overall • Higher than expected % of young children

  9. Selected indicators – L’boro E • Lower adaptive capacity - preparing for, responding to and recovering from events may be difficult • Potential for insurance access problems • Lower HH incomes £280 (vs. £390) • Relatively high rates of new arrivals • 42.3% HHs without a car (vs. 26.3%) • Lower than expected increase in house prices 2003-8 • Higher than average rates of social and private tenants • Large proportion of residents born overseas (20.6% compared to 8.2%)

  10. Regional breakdowns • % of total neighbourhoods in each English region estimated to be extremely socially flood vulnerable • % estimated to be extremely flood disadvantaged (high socio spatial vulnerability & high potential for flood exposure)

  11. Heat disadvantage in England • London’s high average socio-spatial heat vulnerability is coupled with tendency for higher temperatures • England’s climate gradient also offsets some of the low socio-spatial heat vulnerability in South East • But • There is a differential in the tolerance of high temperatures from place to place • Alternative measures required

  12. Socio-spatial heat vulnerability compared to local temperature patterns

  13. There is variation in what drives heat-related social vulnerability Selection accounted for relative temperature pattern (class 5)

  14. Selected indicators – St Matthews & St Peters Leicester 018 • Sensitivity – relatively sensitive • Young children rather than older residents • Reported ill-heath • Physical environment enhances heat • Around 4.8% HHs >= 5th floor (vs. 0.7%) • Relatively small gardens • Less greenspace (85.9% not GS vs. 48.3% ) • Lower adaptive capacity • Lower incomes £160 per HH (vs. £390) • Relatively high % of lone parents & social renters • Lower mobility: personal mobility &access to private transport: 59.1% HHs no car • Relatively good access to health services & local refuges

  15. Key findings and conclusions • Key socially vulnerable groups: • Poverty and deprivation • New residents • Mobility and access • Sensitivity (inherent susceptibility to impacts, age & health) • Enhanced exposure (physical characteristics of neighbourhoods) • Drivers vary  local case studies provide further insight • Almost all neighbourhoods will have some socially vulnerable people but the key characteristics of neighbourhoods can help in targeting and designing local measures alongside other activities Evidence of joint socio-spatial vulnerabilities in the UK – up to 2/3 of the top 10% most socially vulnerable neighbourhoods were so for both flood & heat

  16. ClimateJust - a new decision-support web portal • Aim the primary entry point for learning about climate justice & what constitutes a just response to the challenges of climate change in the UK • ClimateJust will assist users with Awareness Raising; Learning;Responding. • Key element  distributive justice with respect to negative welfare impacts, but drawing on evidence, tools and guidance for other justice elements • The resource is aimed at local authorities and service providers working with local communities. • Development/Testing • Data/case study work • SWOT/’stakeholder’ mapping • Wider dissemination • Interested? Please email sarah.lindley@manchester.ac.uk Increasing engagement & different modes of engagement

More Related