1 / 25

Políticas Públicas em Alcohol

Políticas Públicas em Alcohol. Alcohol policy-makers are answerable to the policy consumers. People consume services, and alcohol policy is a service Alcohol policy serves two purposes: To enhance benefits resulting from use of alcohol To contain/reduce alcohol-related harms

sondra
Download Presentation

Políticas Públicas em Alcohol

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Políticas Públicas em Alcohol

  2. Alcohol policy-makers are answerable to the policy consumers • People consume services, and alcohol policy is a service • Alcohol policy serves two purposes: • To enhance benefits resulting from use of alcohol • To contain/reduce alcohol-related harms • Citizens deserve to know whether enacted alcohol policies are apt and well chosen • High quality policies will be those that are evidence-based

  3. Chosing effective strategies • Need for a systematic procedure to evaluate the evidence, compare alternativa interventions and assess the fbenefits to society of different approaches

  4. Como entender a Tabela 16.1 • Evidence of effectiveness 0 lack of effectiveness + limited effectiveness ++ moderate effectiveness +++ high degree of effectiveness ? No studies, or insuficient evidence

  5. Tabela 16.1(cont.) • Breadth of research support 0 no studies of effectiveness have been undertaken + only one well designed study of effectiveness ++ two to four studies +++ five ir more studies

  6. Tabela 16.1(cont.) • Extent of testing across countries and cultures 0 the strategy has not been tested adequately + strategy studiend in only one country ++ studied in two to four countries +++ five or more countries

  7. Tabela 16.1(cont.) • Cost to implement and sustain Low Moderate High

  8. Target groups (TG) • GP - General population of drinkers • HR - High-risk drinkers or groups particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of alcohol (adolescents) • HD - Persons already manifesting harmful drinking and alcohol dependence

  9. Target groups (cont.) • Of the 32 interventions and strategies evaluated, 16 are targeted at the GP, 12 at HR, and 4 at HD. • Interventions directed at the general population have higher effectiveness ratings thatn those targeted at other groups. • Interventions directed at the general population and high-risk groups tend to be less costly to implement and maintain than interventions with harmful drinkers

  10. Table 16.1. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions

  11. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions – PHYSICAL AVAILABILITY

  12. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions – ALTERING DRINKING CONTEXT

  13. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions – DRINKING-DRIVING

  14. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions – TREATMENT AND EARLY INTERVENTION

  15. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions – EDUCATION AND PERSUATION

  16. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions – REGULATING ALCOHOL PROMOTION

  17. Ratings of policy-relevant stategies and interventions – TAXATION AND PRICING

  18. Integrated alcohol policies Our ratings suggest that a combination of pjysical availability limits at the general population level, certain drinking-driving countermeasures directed at all three target groups, and brief interventions directed at high-risk drinkers will offer the best value as the foundation for a comprehensive alcohol policy approach

  19. The strong strategies • Availability restrictions • Taxation • Enforcement Good research support Applicable in most countries Relatively inexpensive to implement and sustain

  20. Education and public service messages • Expected impact is low for education and public service messages about drinking • High cost • In terms of impact or value-for-money, education strategies have shown little or no effect, regardless of the investment

  21. Treatment and early intervention strategies • Medium effectiveness • Limited impact at the population level • Full treatment for alcohol problems only benefits a relatively small fraction of the population who come to treatment

  22. Altering the drinking context • Research in this area is only now getting under way • It seems that strategies will have some impact without being too costly

  23. Science more accessible to policy-makers • Policy changes should be made with caution and with a sense of experimentation to determine whether they have their intended effects • Interdisciplinary research is capable of playing a critical role in the progress of public health by applying the methodologies of the medical, behavioural, social and population sciences

  24. The precautionary principleA general public health concept • “To take preventive action even in the face of uncertainty” • To shift the burden of proof to the proponents of a potentially harmful actitivy • To offer alternatives to harmful actions • To increase public involvement in decision-making • Decision-making must be guided by the likelihood of risk, rather than the potential for profit

  25. Extraordinary oportunities • Multiple • Changes can be made rationally • Combine rationally selected strategies into an integrated overall policy • The research base is strong • Policies can be implemented at multiple levels • Public awareness and support can be strengthened • International collaboration can be enhanced

More Related