1 / 16

A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning

A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning. V Lakshmanan 1,2 and Gregory Stumpf 1,3 1 CIMMS/University of Oklahoma 2 NSSL 3 NWS/MDL. Motivation. Short term 0-1hr warning for intense cloud-to-ground lightning is valuable to the National Weather Service

Download Presentation

A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning V Lakshmanan1,2 and Gregory Stumpf1,3 1CIMMS/University of Oklahoma 2NSSL 3NWS/MDL lakshman@ou.edu

  2. Motivation • Short term 0-1hr warning for intense cloud-to-ground lightning is valuable to the National Weather Service • Real-time ground truth available • Real-time learning algorithm that adapts to the changing nature of storms, the near-storm environment, the season, geography, etc? lakshman@ou.edu

  3. Observations Computed Functions Advection General Idea Target Inputs Inputs Forecast+30 Target-30 Forecast t0-30 min t0+30 min t0 lakshman@ou.edu

  4. Inputs • Inputs are gridded fields • research has shown that the following fields may predict subsequent lightning activity: • Reflectivity at certain constant height and temperature levels • Presence of mixed phase precipitation (graupel) just above melting level • Earlier lightning activity associated with storm • To minimize radar geometry problems, all the inputs are created using 3D multiple-radar grids. Inputs Target-30 t0-30 min lakshman@ou.edu

  5. Reflectivity at Constant T Levels • Combine data from multiple radars into a 3D multi-radar merged product • Integrate this 3D radar grid with thermodynamic data from the RUC model analysis grids • dBZ at a constant height of T=-10C is shown 3D radar grid from KMLB, KAMX, KTBW, at 1626 UTC 16 July 2004 lakshman@ou.edu

  6. Echo top input • Maximum height of 30dBZ echo is shown 3D radar grid from KMLB, KAMX, KTBW, at 1626 UTC 16 July 2004 lakshman@ou.edu

  7. Target • Target is a lightning density field • Computed from lightning activity in the previous 15 minutes • Advected backward by the prediction interval to account for storm movement. • So that we can do pixel-by-pixel prediction Inputs Target-30 t0-30 min lakshman@ou.edu

  8. Target Lightning Density Field • Cloud-to-Ground (CG) lightning strikes are instantaneous • Average in space (3km, Gaussian) and time (15 min) lakshman@ou.edu

  9. Advecting Target Backwards • We want to predict for each grid pixel • However, storms move • So, need to correct for storm movement • Storm movement estimated using K-means clustering and Kalman filtering lakshman@ou.edu

  10. Mapping Function • We want a mapping function • Pixel-by-pixel predictor of the vector of inputs to the desired target lightning density • Must be fast enough to compute, and learn, in real-time Inputs Target-30 t0-30 min lakshman@ou.edu

  11. Linear Radial Basis Functions • Weighted average of multi-dimensional Gaussian functions, so it is a non-linear system • If you keep xn fixed, this is a linear system. • Solve for sigma and weights by inverting a matrix lakshman@ou.edu

  12. Mapping Function • For example, one of the inputs is dBZ at a constant height of T = -10C • This is the relationship between the reflectivity values and CG lightning activity 30 minutes later (t0 + 30 min) lakshman@ou.edu

  13. Prediction • When predicting, gather the inputs at the current time, then use the same mapping function to make forward prediction • Then advect that forecast field forward by 30 minutes Inputs Forecast+30 Forecast t0+30 min lakshman@ou.edu

  14. Example CG ltg Density at t0 dBZ at a constant ht of T=-10C at t0 Forecast CG ltg Density at t0 + 30 min Observed CG ltg Density at t0 + 30 min lakshman@ou.edu

  15. Future • Test using a variety of input fields, lightning density functions, and forecast intervals • Results to be reported at a future AMS conference • If successful, may be implemented in AWIPS to serve as guidance for future NWS lightning warning products lakshman@ou.edu

  16. Summary • Very much a work in progress • Thanks for listening! • Questions? lakshman@ou.edu

More Related