1 / 49

Writing Scientific Research Articles

Writing Scientific Research Articles. C.B.S. Teh Dept. Land Management, Uni. Putra Malaysia Tel: 03-89466976; Email: cbsteh@yahoo.com. www.christopherteh.com. Why publish?. To leave a record of research To receive feedback on work independent verification on results

sybilp
Download Presentation

Writing Scientific Research Articles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Writing Scientific Research Articles C.B.S. Teh Dept. Land Management, Uni. Putra Malaysia Tel: 03-89466976; Email: cbsteh@yahoo.com www.christopherteh.com

  2. Why publish? • To leave a record of research • To receive feedback on work • independent verification on results • To attract interests from others to expand on your work • To receive recognition for work

  3. Getting published is a skill • Communicating your work • facing criticism and debate • adversarial approach • Writing skill is essential • command of English language • ability to explain and describe your work • clearly, concisely, and accurately

  4. Selecting the journal • Does it publish the kind of work you are doing? • Is it a refereed journal? • Is it cited? • What is its impact factor? • Does it publish quickly? • Are there paper charges?

  5. Criteria for acceptance • Is the contribution new? • Is the contribution significant? • Is it suitable for publication in this journal? • Is the organization suitable? • Do the methods and treatment of results conform to acceptable scientific standards?

  6. Criteria for acceptance • Are all conclusions firmly based in the data presented? • Minor issues • Is the length of paper satisfactory? • Are the illustrations, figures, and tables adequate? • Are the references recent and adequate?

  7. Article structure sometimes combined • Abstract • Introduction • Materials and methods • Results • Discussion • Conclusions • Acknowledgements • Appendices • References

  8. Title of paper • Good titles identify the field of research and indicate the kind of results to be obtained • Avoid • long titles • too general/vague titles • can be misleading • e.g., “Effects of fertilizers on crops” • a Review paper?

  9. Example of title • “Bird use on rice field strips of varying width in the Kanto Plain of central Japan” • The focus is on birds in relation to rice fields • The width of rice field strips was varied in the study • Width of strips was correlated with the number and species of birds using them • The research took place in central Japan

  10. Example of title • “Use of in situ 15N-labelling to estimate the total below-ground nitrogen of pasture legumes in intact soil-plant systems” • The paper focuses on a particular method (in situ 15N-labelling) • The parameter measured was total below-ground nitrogen • The measurement site/context was undisturbed systems involving both plants and soil • The plants used were pasture legumes

  11. Order of preparation

  12. Introduction section • Introduction • Problem statement • What is the problem? • Justification of work • Why is the problem important? • (Impartial) Literature review • Past work results • Objectives (and hypothesis) of study

  13. Citation • Referencing other work is crucial • helps to develop your arguments • prove that you clearly know what has been done before and what needs to be done • Citing when you cannot obtain the original reference • <some fact> (Smith, 1962, cited in Jones, 2002). • in this case, only Jones (2002) appears in the reference list

  14. Plagiarism • “Plagiarism is using data, ideas, or words that originated elsewhere without appropriately acknowledging the source.” • serious offense • reviewers may be knowledgeable in the sources you “stole”

  15. Materials and methods section • Briefly, include • site location (latitude and longitude, elevation) • characteristics of study area (weather, soil, vegetation) • Describe all methods used in study • prefer to cite reference for methods • do not elaborate on commonly used methods

  16. Materials and methods • Describe statistical analysis • experimental design and layout • additional statistics used (e.g., correlation and regression) • Describe equipment and software used • brand, version, and name and location of company • Use past tense

  17. Results section • Present only relevant data • data that serve as evidence to accept or reject hypothesis • Use the best presentation method to display data • Table or Figure? • highlights the most important information prominently • is essential to support your “story”

  18. Results • Presentation of results must be • clear, accurate, and concise • do not duplicate data already shown earlier • e.g., using a table and figure to display the same data

  19. Tables • Tables are most useful for • recording data (raw or processed data) • explaining calculations or showing components of calculated data • showing the actual data values and their precision • allowing multiple comparisons between elements in many directions

  20. Figures • Figures are most useful for • showing an overall trend or ‘‘picture’’; • comprehension of the story through ‘‘shape’’ rather than the actual numbers; and • allowing simple comparisons between only a few elements.

  21. Choosing between table and figure

  22. Sample table • - contains correct and complete units • - minimize horizontal lines, and no vertical lines • proper formatting (numbers are aligned) • adequate number of decimal points

  23. Figures • Pie charts • comparing proportions of a total or whole • Line, column, and bar charts • comparing the values of different categories when they are independent of each other (e.g., boys and girls or different countries) • Scatter charts • display a sequence of variables in time or space • display dependent relationships (e.g., change over time or fertilizer rates).

  24. Common mistakes in preparing figures • Wrong figure type has been chosen • Relationships between elements are not obvious • or are apparent when they do not exist • The shape, shading, pattern or weight of symbols, markers, or lines does not emphasize the main results • Cluttered with lines, legend symbols, or numbers

  25. Common mistakes in preparing figures • Poorly chosen axis scale divisions • too many or too little • Axes not labeled or do not have units

  26. Sample figure 1

  27. Sample figure 2

  28. Figures: dots-per-inch (DPI) • Most journals require at least 300 DPI figures • Copy-and-paste only provides 72 or 96 DPI • far too low for print publications

  29. Figures: dots-per-inch (DPI) • In Excel ver 2003, • select chart, hold down SHIFT button, and choose EDIT then COPY PICTURE from Excel’s main menu bar

  30. Figures: dots-per-inch (DPI) • Or download SciChart (www.christopherteh.com/scichart.zip) • works only in Excel 2003

  31. Figures: dots-per-inch (DPI) • Unfortunately in Excel 2007, Copy Picture does not give good resolution • Instead • select chart, then Print to PDF file • Open PDF file and Save As TIFF file (change Settings for 300 DPI first)

  32. Use of tense in results section • Past tense • when the sentence focuses on the completed study: what was done and found • Present tense • to describe an ‘‘always true’’ situation • when the sentence focuses on the document

  33. Discussion section • In Results, you described the observed trend • what was the trend? • In Discussion, you explain the observed trend • why is the trend like that? • support from results from your own study and from previous studies

  34. Conclusion section • Not a summary of results! • Do not re-defend your results here! • Do not introduce new facts here! • Conclusion is where you answer directly your study’s objectives • Write the conclusion as though you would be telling it (verbally) to a very busy person whom you want to impress about your study’s findings

  35. Conclusion example • Objective: • “To determine the effectiveness of mulch A, B, and C on conserving soil water” • Conclusion: • “Mulch C was determined as the best mulch to conserve soil water, followed by mulch B, then A. On average, mulch C conserved soil water nearly 1.5 times more water than mulch B and 2.3 times more than mulch C. Using mulch C would save up to 1000 mm of water per year.”

  36. Abstract • Always written last • Summary of research (not summary of results) • Problem and justification of study • The principal activity (or purpose) of the study and its scope • Information about some of the methods used • The most important results • A statement of conclusion or recommendation

  37. Submitting the manuscript • Submissions now mostly through online • Read the journal’s Guide to Authors • follow thoroughly, e.g., format and style for paper margins, font size, line spacing, references, citations, number of words in abstract, figures, tables, equations, etc. • Prepare cover letter • Prepare list of potential reviewers • search past papers related to yours • sometimes up to four needed

  38. Documents TIFF format (300 DPI)

  39. Reviewers’ comments?

  40. Reviewers’ comments?

  41. Revision or rejection? • Very rarely a manuscript is accepted first time as it is • Don’t get angry! • don’t take it personally • understand the reviewers objections, criticism, or reservations • reviewers’ fault or your fault? • perhaps your explanation was unclear

  42. Revision • Revision • Read carefully each reviewer’s comments • Respond / answer each of their suggestions and questions • point-by-point response/answer • your paper will often be much improved after following the reviewers’ suggestions

  43. Rejection • Rejection • Read carefully each reviewer’s comments • Respond / answer each of their suggestions and questions • point-by-point response/answer • your paper will often be much improved after following the reviewers’ suggestions • Submit to another journal

  44. Good luck!

More Related