1 / 28

Shawn Cole Harvard Business School

Innovative Financial Services for the Poor: Managing Rainfall Risk Report on a Field Project with SEWA. Shawn Cole Harvard Business School. Acknowledgements. SEWA Leadership, cooperation, and guidance USAID/BASIS Funding IFMR/CMF Funding, Technical Assistance, Research Support

taran
Download Presentation

Shawn Cole Harvard Business School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Innovative Financial Services for the Poor:Managing Rainfall RiskReport on a Field Project with SEWA Shawn Cole Harvard Business School

  2. Acknowledgements • SEWA • Leadership, cooperation, and guidance • USAID/BASIS • Funding • IFMR/CMF • Funding, Technical Assistance, Research Support • Terrific implementation and implementation team • Dozens of SEWA members; Aparna Krishnan, Monika Singh, Nilesh Fernando of CMF • HBS DFRD • Financial support

  3. Today’s Talk • Weather Insurance Description • Project Overview • Why Randomized Trials? • Results • Looking towards the future

  4. An Urgent Need • Two-thirds of India’s population is rural • Hundreds of millions are very poor, with very limited ability to come with monsoon risk • NGO, Government help insufficient • Result: Stress, suffering, farmer suicides, reduced educational investments, costly diversification, under-investment

  5. Price and Output Risk are Aggregate Shocks • Cannot turn to friends, family, neighbors • Asset prices (e.g., livestock) may be depressed • Monsoon correlated with Indian economic growth (e.g., ability to borrow)

  6. Financial Innovation: Rainfall Insurance • Financial derivative on local rainfall • Costs Rs. 50-250, pays Rs. 500-2000 • First sold in India in 2003 (Andhra Pradesh) • Pioneered in Gujarat by SEWA in 2005 • Indian monsoon risk uncorrelated with global financial markets: in principle, insurance rates should be very low • Subsequently copied in dozens of countries

  7. Product Description • Coverage during Kharif (monsoon) • Payout designed to correlate to economic loss from deficit / excess • Limitations on how complex product can be • Transparency • Pricing • ICICI, IFFCO, and AIC Policies • Policy starts after 20-50 mm accumulated • Three phases: sowing, flowering, and harvest • Each phase pays out or not separately

  8. The Promise • Low-cost, scalable intervention • Implement in other developing countries, as well as at the developed world • Absence of such products has puzzled academics for decades

  9. Key Benefits • No adverse selection • No moral hazard • Easy to price • Divisible: policies as cheap, but individuals may purchase many • Easy to purchase (private company and government provide) • Fast claim settlement

  10. Research: The Challenge • Selling a custom-designed financial derivative to individuals with primary education and no experience with formal financial contracts • “If I purchase the insurance, and the rains are good, so the policy doesn’t pay out, do I get a refund of my premium?”

  11. Key limitations • Basis Risk • Water needs perhaps not linear • Distance between plots and gauge • No cover for pests, prices, etc • Complicated • Potentially expensive • Limited re-insurance market

  12. Research Programme • SEWA and CMF Researchers • Identified 1,500 households in 100 villages • From 2006-2009, offered weather insurance in ca. 50 villages • Periodic household surveys • A host of ‘marketing’ experiments

  13. Research Agenda • Impact Evaluation: • (How much) better off are agricultural laborers and farmers who obtain weather insurance • Developing Sustainable Product • Most effective ways to sell • Optimal design of product • Pricing of products • Willingness to pay

  14. Study Context • SEWA • NGO in Gujarat • SEWA members: very poor, limited education, limited landholdings • Ongoing project: 2006-2010 • BASIX • AP MFI, pioneered weather insurance • Groundnut farmers, landowners, high level of trust with BASIX • 2006, 2009 • Large-Scale Project • Ca. 3,500 households visited, involving up to 50 staff

  15. Randomized Evaluation Methodology • Select sample population • Randomly assign ‘treatment’ and ‘control’ groups • Evaluate outcomes following intervention • Similar to drug trials • Very expensive and time-consuming Key advantages • Randomly assign ‘treatment’ and ‘control’ groups • Avoid selection problem • Estimate ‘average’ effects on population • Produce extremeley credible results (cf, drug trials)

  16. Initial Product Take-Up “Low” • Approximately 5% of households in a village purchase insurance in Andhra Pradesh • Purchasing households tend to purchase only one policy • Makes it difficult to offer the product in a sustainable fashion: marketing cost spread over few purchasers

  17. Research Questions: What are the important barriers to adoption? • Price • Expected Return • Liquidity • Trust • Product Education / Financial Literacy

  18. Research Methodology • Understanding demand for product crucial to success • Can’t simple ask people: what is your elasticity of demand? • Experimental approach: offer each household a random discount, measure how purchase decision varies • In cooperation with insurance providers • Similar to medical studies

  19. Key Results: Price • Logic: Expected returns an important determinant of demand, at least in theory; but households have limited ability to calculate expected return • Method: Randomly assign discount coupons to different households to measure price elasticity of demand (cf. Capital One) • Result: A 10% decrease in price increases product demand 6.5 percentage points • Analysis: Even when product is positive NPV (183% gross return), only 47% purchase

  20. Key Results: Product Awareness • Logic: Most households unaware of rainfall insurance; indeed, most have never entered a formal financial contract • Method: (Costly) door-to-door marketing visits • Result: Increases purchase of the product substantially: 13% • Analysis: Not a cost-effective marketing tool (unless respondent becomes a subscriber)

  21. Key Results: Product Education • Logic: Households unfamiliar with index insurance • Method: Additional education module as part of household visit • Result: No increase in take-up • Analysis: Surprisingly, education not effective

  22. Key Results: Trust • Logic: Insurance is a promise of a future contingent payment; ICICI/Lombard relatively unknown • Method: BASIX representative, known to household, accompanies insurance salesperson and endorses product • Result: Increases product demand 6.5 percentage points • Analysis: May help explain success of AIC product

  23. Key Results: Liquidity • Logic: Insurance purchase decision made during planting, competing with other inputs (fertilizer, seeds) • Method: Randomly assign cash compensation for survey of Rs. 125 to households (price of policy Rs. 100-Rs. 150) • Result: Larger cash compensation increases take-up by 35 percentage points • Analysis: Dramatic effect: suggests timing of insurance sales important; loans for policies might be effective; possible priming effect

  24. Key Results: Willingness to pay • Sustainability of product depends on willingness to pay • Difficult to elicit willingness to pay with hypothetical questions • Innovative field experiment measuring willingness to pay: • Given scratch card with a price sought • Asked to indicate willingness to pay • Number written down • Scratch off result: if reported number is above scratch card price, then purchase is made; if number below price, no sale

  25. Key Results: Willingness to pay for 1 policy

  26. Key Result: Willingness to pay for 4 policies

  27. Conclusion and Discussion • Product has tremendous theoretical merit and practical promise • Attractive alternative to crop insurance • Substantial barriers to adoption • Difficult to effectively educate consumers • Consumers have difficulties evaluating product • Liquidity constraints bind • Technological improvements my substantially improve product • Developing reinsurance market may improve pricing • Group negotiations for policies quite desirable

  28. Aawar

More Related