1 / 11

ERICA

ERICA. E fficacy of R anolazine I n C hronic A ngina trial. Background and hypothesis. Incidence of symptomatic angina in stable CAD patients remains high despite the use of conventional agents and/or revascularization

tea
Download Presentation

ERICA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ERICA Efficacy of Ranolazine In Chronic Angina trial

  2. Background and hypothesis • Incidence of symptomatic angina in stable CAD patients remains high despite the use of conventional agents and/or revascularization • Traditional pharmacologic therapies determinants of MVO2(heart rate, myocardial contractility, wall stress) • Combinations of these therapies may provide incremental antianginal efficacy but may also produce side effects • Ranolazine is a new antianginal agent with a novel mechanism of action that does not significantly affect HR or wall stress Does ranolazine reduce angina in CAD patientsdespite treatment with the maximum dose of a conventional antianginal agent (amlodipine)? MVO2 = Myocardial oxygen consumption Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  3. ERICA: Study design Evaluation of Ranolazine In Chronic Angina History of CAD* Stable angina (≥3 angina episodes/week)Amlodipine 10 mg/dayN = 565 Ranolazine extended-release 500 mg bid (1 week) then 1000 mg bidn = 281 Placebon = 284 RandomizedDouble-blind 7 weeks Primary efficacy variable:Angina frequency (weekly average) *≥60% stenosis, previous MI, and/or stress-induced perfusion defect Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  4. ERICA: Concomitant medications N = 564 on amlodipine 10 mg/day *All other antianginals were proscribed Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  5. ERICA: Ranolazine reduces angina frequency and nitrate consumption N = 564 on amlodipine 10 mg/day 6 5 P = 0.028 4 Mean number per week P = 0.014 3 2 1 0 Baseline Week 7 Baseline Week 7 Angina episodes Nitroglycerin use Placebo Ranolazine 1000 mg bid Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  6. ERICA: Consistent treatment effect regardless of gender, age, and concomitant long-acting nitrates N = 564 on amlodipine 10 mg/day; week 7 4 3.5 3 Meanangina episodes per week 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Women Men <65 years ≥65 years LAN use No LAN Placebo Ranolazine 1000 mg bid LAN = long-acting nitrates Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  7. ERICA subgroup analyses: Frequency of angina N = 564 on amlodipine 10 mg/day Angina episodes per week >4.5 ≤4.5 >4.5 ≤4.5 6 P= 0.029 30 P= 0.57 5 P< 0.001 P< 0.001 4 20 Number/week SAQ score( baseline) 3 P= 0.036 P= 0.28 2 10 1 0 0 Angina frequency NTG use Angina frequency NTG use Seattle Angina Questionnaire(angina frequency domain) Placebo Ranolazine 1000 mg bid Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  8. ERICA: No significant effect on heart rate or BP N = 564 on amlodipine 10 mg/day; Supine measurement Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  9. ERICA: Safety and tolerability N = 564 on amlodipine 10 mg/day Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  10. ERICA: Summary • Added to maximum-dose amlodipine, ranolazine extended-release 1000 mg bid for 6 weeks significantly reduced angina frequency and nitroglycerin use • Treatment effect appeared to be greater in patients with >4.5 angina episodes weekly • No significant change in HR or BP; no cases of torsades de pointes reported • Low withdrawal rate due to adverse events in both groups • 1.1% ranolazine • 1.4% placebo Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75.

  11. Implications • ERICA efficacy parameters are in agreement with previous studies using antianginal agents • SAQ* provides an appealing feature to assess disease-specific measures of quality of life • Because ranolazine can prolong QTc, the daily dose should not exceed 1000 mg/day; use should be limited to patients unresponsive to other antianginal agents Ranolazine provides additional, well-tolerated antianginal efficacy in patients who remain symptomatic despite maximal CCB therapy Cairns JA. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:576-8. Stone PH et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:566-75. *Seattle Angina Questionnaire

More Related