1 / 14

Ruth Stewart and colleagues from across the collaboration ruths@uj.ac.za

Introducing the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. Ruth Stewart and colleagues from across the collaboration ruths@uj.ac.za. What is the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence?.

teige
Download Presentation

Ruth Stewart and colleagues from across the collaboration ruths@uj.ac.za

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introducing the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Ruth Stewart and colleagues from across the collaboration ruths@uj.ac.za

  2. What is the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence? Formally constituted in 2008, a global, not-for-profit, open collaboration of scientists, managers and policy formers interested in evidence synthesis. Provides guidelines for Review Teams encouraging Systematic Review activity to high standards. A repository of CEE Systematic Reviews to inform decision making and disseminates their findings through an open-access website and journal. Works with commissioners to provide reliable reviews of evidence to meet their evidence needs www.environmentalevidence.org

  3. CEE Structure CEE Governance - Board of Trustees, Editorial Board, Advisory Board, Website CEE Centres – Currently four centres with lead centre in Bangor, UK. Centres provide regional co-ordination, training, liaison with Commissioners and networking across collaboration.

  4. CEE Structure CEE Methods Groups – Development of SR methodology and Guidelines. Improving standards of conduct and scientific rigour CEE Review Groups – subject-based development of SR questions and co-ordinating conduct of reviews – subject (handling) editors

  5. SR as a recognised standard

  6. CEE Growth To date approx 60 SRs have been completed across the range of environmental management from species protection to sustainable forestry. A similar number is in progress. Systematic reviews now commissioned by diversity of funders – DEMAND DRIVEN UK – (Research Councils, Living with Environmental Change Programme, Defra, Environment Agency, Dept for International Development) Europe - EU FP7, US Forest Service, USDA, AusAid, Aus Land & Water, UNEP, FAO Review Teams register with CEE, undertake SRs to CEE Guidelines and publish their SRs in the CEE journal, Environmental Evidence.

  7. CEE in the UK • ADD

  8. CEE in South Africa • ADD

  9. Stockholm CEE Sweden We work for environmental management to be placed on a scientific foundation. Through systematic reviews of various environmental issues, we aim to improve the basis for decisions in Swedish environmental policy. EviEM Executive Committee The Secretariat Financed by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research 2012-2016

  10. Ongoing EviEM systematicreviews • SR1. How is mountain vegetation affected by reindeer grazing? • SR2. How effective are wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal? SR3.Can biomanipulation improve water quality in eutrophicated lakes? • SR4. How do different farming methods affect the organic carbon content of arable soils? SR5.Have the phase-outs of PFASs affected concentrations in the environment? SR6.How is biodiversity influenced by active management of protected forests?

  11. CEE in Australia • The first Australian CEE Centre was established in 2012 • The Centre has focussed on: • advocacy and training of SR • using review findings to assist practitioners in decision making • Using SR methods to undertake better secondary research • integration of SR and SR methods into the adaptive management cycle • the role of evidence based practice in the environmental sector Contact: www.evidentiary.com.au Email: robr@evidentiary.com.au

  12. Recent titles Completed • ADD URBAN AGRICULTURE • What are the major barriers to increased use of modern energy services among the world’s poorest people and are interventions to overcome these effective? (DFID funded) • What is the evidence that scarcity and shocks in freshwater resources can cause conflict instead of promoting collaboration in arid to subhumidhydroclimates? (DFID funded) • The evidence base for community forest management as a mechanism for supplying global environmental benefits and improving local welfare (GEF funded) • Are interventions to reduce the impact of arsenic contamination of groundwater on human health and crop productivity in developing countries effective? (Aus AID) • What are the effects of wooded riparian zones on stream temperature? (NERC funded) • Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas (GEF funded) In progress • Comparison of methods for the measurement and assessment of carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools (FAO funded) • What is the impact of infrastructural investments in roads, electricity and irrigation on agricultural productivity? (DFID funded) • How effective are slurry storage, cover or catch crops, woodland creation, controlled trafficking or break-up of compacted layers, and buffer strips as on-farm mitigation measures for delivering an improved water environment? (Defra funded)

More Related