1 / 14

Water Quality Credit Trading

Water Quality Credit Trading. Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting. Overview. Clean Water Act 101 Complexities of Regulating N utrients Water Quality Credit Trading New statewide policy A tool in the toolbox for water body restoration Future Policy Modifications?.

uta
Download Presentation

Water Quality Credit Trading

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Water Quality Credit Trading Florida League of Cities 2013 Annual Meeting

  2. Overview • Clean Water Act 101 • Complexities of Regulating Nutrients • Water Quality Credit Trading • New statewide policy • A tool in the toolbox for water body restoration • Future Policy Modifications? David Childs Hopping Green & Sams

  3. Clean Water Act 101 • Water Quality Criteria • Protect “designated uses” of water bodies • Translated into discharge permit limits • TMDL Program (safety net) • Restoration program • Point and non-point sources allocated pollutant loads • Discharge Permits • Wastewater Treatment Plants • Municipal Storm Water Discharges David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  4. Nutrient TMDLS • Florida already has over 80 nutrient TMDLs • FDEP Numeric Nutrient Criteria Rule approved by EPA means even more nutrient TMDLs • Significant nutrient reductions for storm water • Bayou Chico: 30% TN & TP reductions • North Escambia Bay: 35% TP reduction • Hillsborough River (channelized segment): 50% TN & 60% TP reductions • Lake Dora: 67% reduction in TP David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  5. Complexity of Regulating Nutrients • Citizens have an expectation of healthy natural rivers, streams, lakes, and marine waters… David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  6. Complexity of Regulating Nutrients • …but public expectations do not always mesh with scientific, economic, & regulatory realities. • National Academy of Sciences: Reality Check • Report on Chesapeake Bay TMDL • Public concern ≠ public willingness to pay the price • Disconnect between achievement of a standard & appreciable water quality improvement • Substantial public commitment and “some level of sacrifice from all who live and work in the watershed” David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  7. What tools are available to help cities restore water bodies and comply with nutrient load reduction requirements (i.e. TMDLs) in a cost effective manner? David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  8. Water Quality Credit Trading • TMDL Program (safety net) • Restoration program • Point and non-point sources allocated pollutant loads • Water Quality Credit Trading • Pollutant reductions are environmentally valued in the form of “credits,” which can then be traded on a local “market” to promote cost-effective water quality improvements. • Goal: better water quality protection for less $$. David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  9. Water Quality Credit Trading • HB 713 (2013) • Bipartisan Passage • Supporters included the League of Cities, Southeast Milk, Audubon, and other diverse interests • Expanded the St. Johns Pilot Program Statewide • Trading is voluntary & completely market driven • References: • §403.067(9), F.S. • Rule 62-306, F.A.C. (not yet updated) David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  10. Water Quality Credit Trading CAFO Storm Water Utility $$$ Nitrogen Load Economic Solution ► Water Quality Standards Achieved ►Local Government Saves Money

  11. Water Quality Credit Trading • The nitty-gritty • Credits must be quantifiable & enforceable • Point source credits must be measured • Nonpoint sources can be estimated • Reasonable assurance • Uncertainty factor • Location factors may increase credits needed • Creditable actions include…installing treatment equipment…operational changes…structural nonpoint source management David Childs Hopping Green & Sams

  12. Water Quality Credit Trading • Practical & Program Limitations • Trading will not work everywhere • Need willing buyer and willing seller • Seller must meet its allocation & can only sell its surplus reductions • Transaction must include a surface water discharge permit holder • No credit for land use changes that don’t result in loadings equal to or less than natural conditions • Ongoing nutrient criteria litigation = chilling effect David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  13. Credit Trading 2.0? • Remove barriers to entry into marketplace • Allow trading in absence of discharge permit • Loosen timing requirements • Enable “mitigation banking” style credit generation • Expand concept into water supply arena • Promote land use conversions that restore landscape and promote aquifer recharge David Childs • Hopping Green & Sams

  14. Discussion David W. Childs DavidC@hgslaw.com Hopping Green & Sams 119 S. Monroe Street Suite 300 Tallahassee, FL 32301 (850) 222-7500

More Related