1 / 15

Performance Management in Sweden

Performance Management in Sweden. Allan Gustafsson Seoul, March 18, 2004. Features of Swedish government.  50 % redistribution Local government dominates government consumption 20 out 28 % Small Ministries – numerous and independent agencies

vin
Download Presentation

Performance Management in Sweden

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performance Management in Sweden Allan Gustafsson Seoul, March 18, 2004

  2. Features of Swedish government •  50 % redistribution • Local government dominates government consumption • 20 out 28 % • Small Ministries – numerous and independent agencies • Only 2 % of all government employees in the Cabinet Offices

  3. Objective of PM • Effectiveness (Do the right thing) • Efficiency (Do things right)

  4. Ambit • Political culture, media • Parliamentary process • Interaction legislature – Government • External audit, research institutions • Internal processes in Cabinet Offices • Interaction Cabinet Offices – agencies • Internal processes in agencies • Interaction agencies – public

  5. Basic tenet regarding efficiency • Authority + accountability  efficiency

  6. Authority • Block appropriations • Carry-over & credit facilities • Authority over payments • Personnel • Premises • Own revenue • Accounting

  7. Accountability & responsibility Vis-à-vis government • Agency ordinance (general) • Agency specific instructions • Letter of appropriation • Objectives and results indicators • Ad hoc reporting requirements • Finances • Statement of accounts and yearly report • Follow-up meeting with responsible minister • External audits • Evaluation of financial management

  8. Accountability & responsibility Vis-à-vis the public • Consumer choice • The Parliamentary Ombudsman • The media

  9. Effectiveness Not integral part of budget process • Committees • Cabinet Office working groups • Research institutes • Performance evaluations • Three-year proposals (abandoned)

  10. Accountability & responsibility Vis-à-vis the elected bodies • Agency statements of accounts and yearly report • Consolidated Government annual accounts

  11. Implementation • Drawn-out, piecemeal • Different champions • Initiatives from below • Inertia • Resistance

  12. Results • Greater efficiency – yes! • Greater effectiveness – ?

  13. Difficulties and issues • Willingness and capacity to reassess • Program structure • Definition and agreement on objectives and indicators • Financial and results reporting • Budget ≠ accounts • Monitoring and evaluation capacity • Integration into political process • Cross-institutional coordination and decision-making

  14. Performance budgeting

  15. Programmatic structure Objective Budget Outcome Cost Policy area Programme Objective Budget Outcome Cost Objective Budget Outcome Cost Strategy Sub-programme Objective Budget Output Cost Objective Budget Output Cost Objective Budget Output Cost Minstry A Minstry B

More Related