Chemtrails in Plain Sight

1. Chemtrails in Plain Sight Chemtrails, Weather Modification, and Orgone Energy

3. Introduction In this presentation, we shall look at: • Chemtrails – Evidence “hidden” in plain view • Weather Modification Research • Wilhelm Reich & Orgone Energy • Cloudbusters • The Evidence For Weather Modification in Action • Legislation which explicitly mentions Weather Modification and/or Chemtrails. • Weather Control Used on 9/11

4. Chemtrails Including a tiny selection of thousands of photos from around the world.

5. An Overview of Chemtrails • Word derived from “Chemical Trail” from aircraft. • Some people prefer “Aerosol” or “Persistent Jet Trail” as “Chemtrails” are often automatically dubbed a “Conspiracy Theory” • They are real, not theoretical (despite what all authorities try to tell us.) • Thought to have begun to appear in the mid 80’s to early 90’s. • Purpose is unknown – though could be for one or more of: • Weather Modification • Biowarfare • Atmospheric Modification to change properties or introduce aerosols to suppress immunity, affect crop yield, reduce biodiversity • Very little direct information available outside personal observation and the odd rumour • Disinformation is actively being put out.

6. Chemtrail Researchers • I have either corresponded with or mentioned the research of: • Clifford Carnicom (New Mexico, USA) • Rosalind Peterson (California, USA) • Phil Morris (Formerly Cheshire, now Middle East) • William Thomas (USA) • Wayne Hall (Greece)

7. Contrails – Let’s Get One Thing Clear • Kerosene is classed as a “Hydrocarbon” – it mainly contains alkanes – which are made up of carbon (approximately 85%) and hydrogen (approximately 12%). There are some other compounds in kerosene which contain nitrogen and sulphur (approximately 1% or 2% each respectively). When Kerosene burns, therefore, it can only form compounds that contain elements that were originally in the Kerosene, or in the air it burns in. Not surprisingly, then, the main compounds that form when Kerosene burns are: • Carbon Dioxide (the infamous “greenhouse gas”, which we all breathe out) • Sulphur Dioxide (in small quantities – a toxic, greenhouse gas, which mixes with water to form acid rain – sulphurous and sulphuric acid) • Carbon Monoxide – a toxic, flammable gas, responsible for some deaths which happen when gas heating equipment is faulty. • Water.

8. Contrails – Let’s Get One Thing Clear • When we look at each of these compounds in turn, we find that they are all colourless. • So, when kerosene burns, it would seem that the only visible thing we should see in the sky is the condensation – which, like our breath on a cold day, should disappear in a few tens-of-seconds. Indeed, when a jet takes off, we can see that only colourless compounds come out of back – all that we see is “hot air”.

9. What is the Difference Between Chemtrailsand Contrails? • This time-lapse video clip clearly shows the difference, in terms of “survival” time between chemtrails and contrails

10. Chemtrails are Just Contrails! http://www.orgonelab.org/chemtrails.htm • B-17 Bombers over Europe, 1943. Lots of Ordinary Persisting Contrails, but no Chemtrails". • This is a fairly typical statement… but ignores that it was: • Over 60 years ago. • Wartime • Flying in formation! • This does not show all chemtrails are contrails!

11. Chemtrails Photos Some of these have been sent to me from around the UK and World.

12. Chemtrails - Cheshire

13. Chemtrails – From Space • Note the “grid” pattern. Also, bear in mind that this picture was taken at a minimum altitude of 150 miles (250km), AND from an angle. We are looking at an atmospheric phenomenon, which is at least 300 miles (500km) from the lens! Ordinary, normal contrails could not, and would not, be visible from such a distance. In any case, contrails would never last long enough to create this blanket of material over such a wide area. And from whence does all this MASS come from?? We're looking at MILLIONS OF TONS of material to make a layer like this in the atmosphere folks. We can only guess how many square miles/kilometers of continental territory are shown in this photograph, but the area seen here is huge. All of this caused by mere jet engine exhaust? I DON'T THINK SO.

14. Chemtrails – From Space Here is another photo of chem-trails taken from orbit, over north-western Europe, at a minimum altitude of 150 miles (250km), and is probably much higher since we can see entire countries here. We can make out the lower part of the Danish peninsula at the top of the picture. Note the spray activity is concentrated mostly over Germany. Once again, simple jet engine exhaust can not account for this much MASS!

15. Chemtrails - USA NOAA Picture

16. Chemtrails - Michigan Battle Creek Michigan 2004. The day begins without a cloud in the sky... Until the planes appear and so often they fly in pairs.

17. Borrowash – 7th April 2003 • I took this for the “Sundog” Rainbow effect. • Never noticed the Chemtrails then… (“Chemtrail Blindness”)

18. Chemtrails – France/Spain • Pyrenees – 15th April 2008 (Alan Cruickshank)

19. Redding - California 11th June 2004

20. Lake District, Sept 11th 2005

21. Embsay - Yorkshire 25th Mar 2006 Picture by Damian Sheeran

22. Place Centrale, Paris – 24th Aug 2005 Picture by Paul Ponnsot

23. Borrowash “Sunset Grid” 10th June 2005

24. “Sunset Grid” 10th June 2005 – 2 I can count at least 9 separate trails – several of them intersecting!

25. Straight Line Clouds? Several Instances Photographed by Andrew Johnson

26. Linear Rainbow Effects – 15 Jun 2009

27. Linear Cloud Bands – 21 Dec 2009

28. Linear Cloud Band – 18 Jun 2009

29. Linear Cloud Bank – 25 Dec 2007

30. How Long Do Chemtrails Last? • As this time-lapse Borrowash video clip shows, at least 18 minutes in one case!

31. Chemtrails are NOT Contrails - 1 • 1   Visibility of Trails on Satellite Photos • The mass of water vapour contained in a standard Contrail would be tiny, and certainly not observable from 150 miles up in space, and yet as Jeff Challender observes, we can see the trails on many satellite photographs. • 2   Time of Trail Persistence • Vapour trails from aircraft should NEVER persist for more than about 2 minutes – even in ideal conditions. This can easily and clearly be demonstrated from the time lapse footage. A chemtrail does not even behave like a cloud formation – it does not “billow” – it forms, spreads out and then “fades away”. • 3Irregular Pattern of Appearance • The frequency of appearance of trails does not bear any noticeable relationship to levels of civilian air traffic.

32. Chemtrails are NOT Contrails - 2 • 4 Height of Appearance of Trails • With repeated observation, some chemtrails can be seen at much lower altitudes than any persistent contrails should ever appear at – this can be observed from the apparent size of the plane in the sky. For example, contrails are normally seen to form when planes are so high in the sky that it is difficult to make out the colour or any salient features the aircraft may have. I have observed persistent trails from aircraft perhaps as low as an estimated 15,000 feet • 5  Number of Trails Seen simultaneously at a Given Time • As demonstrated in the Case Study, it is not possible to have such a high level of civilian or, for that matter, military air traffic (even during an exercise) which would generate the observed number of trails (42 planes flying over a small area in 2½ hours).

33. Chemtrails are NOT Contrails - 3 • 6   “Broken” Trails • In many cases, instances of “broken” trails are seen – and these “breaks” are also persistent. If the trail was a contrail, a break in it would indicate that the engine had momentarily stopped burning fuel – and clearly this would not make sense. In some cases, the breaks in these trails seem to be deliberate – to form some kind of grid or arrangement of the spray pattern.

34. Planes & Chemtrails 1 • In contrast to the ordinary commercial jet I recorded in flight on 16 February 2005, here is what appears to be a US Air Force cargo jet. This is the pattern we see when a plane is spraying chemicals. Please note that the "exhaust" comes from the entire span of the wings. There is a heavily concentrated plume directly from the tail in the center as well, where there are NO engines. Please compare this craft with the one in the previous series of pictures showing a regular contrail

35. Planes & Chemtrails 2

36. Planes & Chemtrails 3

37. Planes & Chemtrails 4

38. Planes & Chemtrails 5

39. Chemtrail From Circular Craft • http://www.carnicom.com/anomalies1.htm West of Vail, Colorado on March 7, 2008 at 5:23PM

40. Chemtrail Shadow Anomalies • http://www.flickr.com/photos/trailsinaustin/1223107217/sizes/l/in/set-72157601637448953/ • Shadow appears in 2 different orientations While flying to Alaska on 7/23/07 I had a close encounter with a chemtrail plane. It looked like it was going to cross the path of our plane then it veered left and went right by the side of our plane. After it passed us it looked as if something may have been spraying out our plane for a short while.

41. Chemtrail Stealth-Plane? • http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page2028.html?theme=light • Taken somewhere in the USA by “Eddie”. Taken in Approx May 2007

42. Chemtrails on TV News! • On NBC4 News LA - 16th May 2006

43. Challenging Official Agencies They refuse to look at the evidence – or they deny it.

44. Chemtrails – Official EPA Response • Clifford Carnicom in the USA has written to the Environmental Protection Agency on many occasions and even sent them samples of material. http://www.carnicom.com/epa7.htm

45. US Air Force Response - Aug 2001 • This was the response to a letter sent by Joanne Meehan. http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/USAFletter/USAFleter1608011.htm

46. June 2007 - 20-Page Report Sent to DfT, Dept of Environment etc • 20 page report regarding chemtrails, signed by 20 people sent to : • Department of Environment • Civil Aviation Authority • Royal Air Force • Greenpeace • World Wildlife Fund • Others • A few copies available here, or download free at http://www.checktheevidence.com/

47. Responses Received from DfT • I engaged in an exchange with Roger Worth and he sent some useful information regarding a report written about Contrail formation by Prof Ulrich Schumann of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics “FORMATION, PROPERTIES AND CLIMATIC EFFECTS OF CONTRAILS” • This 26-page study included no stated maximum figure of Contrail Persistence • It talks about contrail formation being linked to cirrus cloud formation, but states there is no proven link between them. • It does indeed discuss persistent "contrails" but does not explain why they form and the duration of their persistence is not discussed in detail or with any empirical data.

48. Responses Received from DfT - 2 • Mentions the standard contrail duration of maximum 2 minutes. • It states that ice supersaturation in the atmosphere may be the cause of persistent contrail formation but no firm link is documented or established. • Figure of 150 km is quoted for the maximum size of a region of ice supersaturation. • I have measured chemtrails that are over 300 km long. • Only one ordinary (optical) photos or maybe none • No time-lapse studies These studies can be made with cheap and simple equipment and are useful for gathering quantitative raw data.

49. Responses Received from DfT - 3 • One of Roger Worth’s responses said: • There is simply no evidence of unknown aerosols being covertly introduced and to claim otherwise is distorting the facts. • So, he ignores time-lapse videos, grid photos, broken trails, low altitude trails, trails on some days not others… • All in a day’s work, ay?

50. Greenpeace and WWF • Greenpeace never responded to the report. • A later response from them, highlighting this and other climate data resulted in the response: • “Thanks for your e-mail, it’s interesting to hear your views. As Greenpeace is absolutely going to continue campaigning on climate change, as it has been internationally for decades, I guess we will have to agree to differ on this one and I have taken you off our supporter records as requested.” • WWF responded: • “I am sorry you are disappointed in our response. We do not have the staff time and resources to address the issues you raise at this time. As I am sure you can appreciate we have limited resources and staff and must address the most urgent issues that fall within our mandate.”