2018 State Accountability A-F

1. 2018 State AccountabilityA-F Accountability2018 September 20, 2018 District Board Meeting

2. New Accountability System: A-F • Domain III: • Closing the Gaps • # of Student Groups Meeting Targets • 14 groups – Ethnicities, EcoDis, SPED, EL, Enrollment Groups • Groups will be measured on: • STAAR Growth • STAAR Performance (Approaches, Meets, Masters) • EL Proficiency • CCMR & Graduation • Domain I: • Student Achievement • Elementary & Middle Schools: • STAAR Performance (100%) • % Approaches, % Meets, and % Masters • High Schools: • STAAR Performance (40%) • % Approaches, % Meets, and % Masters • CCMR - College, Career, Military Readiness (40%) • Graduation Rate (20%) • Domain II: • School Progress • Part A: Academic Growth • Based on Student Growth and Performance in Reading & Math • Part B: Relative Performance • STAAR Performance compared to a predicted performance based on % Eco Dis

3. On an assessment with 4 performance levels … there are 3 pass rates! Approaches Meets Masters Did Not Meet Grade Level Meets Grade Level Masters Grade Level Approaches Grade Level % Approaches Grade Level % Masters Grade Level % Meets Grade Level % Approaches Grade Level % Meets Grade Level % Meets Grade Level % Masters Grade Level % Masters Grade Level

4. The “What If” Report will have letter grades in Nov./Dec. Clint ISD 2018 Ratings

6. accountability

7. … so let’s have F igure out how to calculate Domain scores U nderstand the impact of Domains N avigate connections to instruction

8. A few things before we get started…

9. Overall Rating Better of Domain I or Domain II 70% Domain III 30% • 30% on Domain III • 70% on the better of Domain I or Domain II • Since Domain II is the better of Part A or Part B … • 70% of the overall rating will be based on the BEST of • Domain I • Domain II – Part A • Domain II – Part B Overall Rating Best Score

10. Online Testing Disruptions

12. HB 22 This This + This This + This + This

13. What would Student Achievement have looked like in the OLD DAYS? (i.e., LAST YEAR!)

14. STAAR Performance 71 + 38+ 13= 122 122 ÷ 3 = 41 Score = 41 So … what does Student Achievement look like THIS year??

15. STAAR Performance in 2018-19?

16. what impact does this have? let’s say this is how our students did in 2017-18 … Approaches Meets Masters 70% Approaches 30% Meets 70 30 10 10% Masters 37

17. what impact does this have? how do we get better? what if in 2018-19 we do what we have always done – which means focus on our lowest performing students Approaches Meets Masters 80% Approaches 20% Meets 80 20 10 10% Masters 37

18. what impact does this have? what if we re-envision planning and instruction … and we focus on ALL students (ESPECIALLY students who are already passing) … Approaches Meets Masters 80% Approaches 50% Meets 80 50 20 20% Masters 50

19. what impact does this have? what if the result of fousing on ALL students means that we don’t actually move any students from Did Not Meet to Approaches … Approaches Meets Masters 70% Approaches 50% Meets 70 50 20 20% Masters 47

20. the takeaway… 2018 Accountability will reward schools that PULLTHESTRING meaning … focus on the needs of ALL students – particularly high performing students and leverage their learning to benefit all students! historically, the accountability system in Texas has been a PUSHTHESTRINGsystem meaning … focus on the lowest performing students to get them to passing (even at the cost of failing to appropriately serve the highest performing students)

21. what does this mean for planning? how do we pull all students up? Approaches Meets Masters Did Not Meet Grade Level Meets Grade Level Masters Grade Level Approaches Grade Level 1 2 3

22. HB 22  

23. College, Career, Military Readiness (CCMR) This is what it looks like …

24. College, Career, Military Readiness (CCMR) Y Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y Y N N 1 Y N N N N N N N 0 N N N N N N N N 1 Y Y N N N N N Y 1 Y N Y N N N N N .5 N Y N N N N N N 0 N N N N N N N N 0 N N N N N N N N This is what it looks like … 0 N N N N N N N N 0 N N N N N N

25. HB 22    • Graduation Rate • [MSC = 10 students in class with small number analysis if <10 students in class]: • 4-year, 5-year or 6-year longitudinal graduation rate of All Students group (with state exclusions) or annual dropout rate of All Students group (if graduation rate is not available)

26. HB 22    

29. Part A Part B

30. School Progress DomainPart A: Academic Growth • Methodology • Calculate based on Reading and Math combined results (beginning at Grade 4) • Reading tests: Grades 4-8 and English II • Math tests: Grades 4-8 and Algebra I • Success = • Maintain Performance Level • Meet STAAR Progress Academic Growth

31. .5 Point – Did not Meet Progress 0 Points – Went Backwards 1 Point- Met or Exceeded Progress 2018 2017

32. how?

33. Starting with how students did in Spring 2018 … what is the NUMBER 1 priority for Spring 2019? looking at growth Do NOT let kids fail backwards! Approaches to Approaches Meets stay Meets Masters stay Masters

34. Part A Part B

35. School Progress DomainPart B: Relative Performance • Methodology • For each district/campus, look at 2 measures • Domain I Score • STAAR Performance Only, OR • Average of STAAR Performance and CCMR • % EcoDis Students • Compare Relative Performance ACTUAL Domain I Score PREDICTED Domain I Score (for a district/campus with the same % EcoDis) to

36. What about 2 campuses with the SAME Domain I Score, but different %ages of EcoDis? C ? ? A Domain I Score = 66 Student Achievement (STAAR Performance or Average of STAAR Performance and CCMR)

38. Part A Whichever score is BETTER (Part A or Part B) becomes the Domain II Score Part B

40. High Schools and Districts Elem and Middle Schools 14 student groups

41. Targets Targets Targets Targets

42. Meets Grade Level 28% 38% 50% 24% 19% 38% 35% 35% 20% 41% 36% 38% 43% 42% 35% 4-Year Grad Rate TELPAS Composite Score Increase CCMR

44. what is my overall rating?

45. overall rating Better of Domain I or Domain II 70% Domain III 30% Overall Rating Best Score • 30% on Domain III • 70% on the better of Domain I or Domain II • Since Domain II is the better of Part A or Part B … • 70% of the overall rating will be based on the BEST of • Domain I • Domain II – Part A • Domain II – Part B

46. Scale Scores and Ratings for Districts: • 90 to 100 = A • 80 to 89 = B • 70 to 79 = C • 60 to 69 = D • < 60 = F Overall Score and Rating

47. The “What If” Report will have letter grades in Nov./Dec. Clint ISD 2018 Ratings

48. Thank you!