1 / 17

Patrick Weltevrede & Simon Johnston

The population of pulsars with interpulses and the implications for beam evolution ( astro-ph/0804.4318). Patrick Weltevrede & Simon Johnston. ATNF. Low-Frequency Pulsar Science Leiden 2008. Pulsar timing for GLAST. Timing ~ 160 pulsars with Parkes

yen
Download Presentation

Patrick Weltevrede & Simon Johnston

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The population of pulsars with interpulses and the implications for beam evolution(astro-ph/0804.4318) Patrick Weltevrede & Simon Johnston ATNF Low-Frequency Pulsar Science Leiden 2008

  2. Pulsar timing for GLAST • Timing ~ 160 pulsars with Parkes • Perfect dataset to study young & energetic pulsars

  3. Standard model for pulsar beams Gould 1994, Rankin 1990, Rankin 1993, Kramer et al. 1994, Gil et al. 1993

  4. Pulse width distribution • Expect W  P -1/2 • Large scatter because of unknown geometry • Correlation is flatter (slope is ~ - 0.3) • Same as in the Gould & Lyne (1998) data

  5. Idea: beam evolution The magnetic axis evolves towards alignment with the rotation axis (Tauris & Manchester 1998) Long period pulsar older more aligned beams W  P -1/2 (P large, W small) W increasing with P W - P correlation flatter

  6. Idea: consequence for IP If90o, we can see the interpulse Most pulsars with interpulses should be young if there is beam evolution

  7. Observations: interpulses • Literature: 27/1487 slow pulsars have an interpulse (1.8%) IP pulsars • Includes 3 new weak interpulses • Some “interpulses” will be aligned rotators observed fraction is an upper-limit J0905-5127 J1126-6054 J1637-4553 slow pulsars

  8. The model: beam geometry • Pick a random pairs from the pulsar catalogue (slow pulsars) • Calculate beam size: • Pick random birth  and a random line of sight (both  and + distributions are sinusoidal) • Allow alignment:

  9. The model: elliptical beams • If polar cap is bounded by the last open field lines, the beam could be elliptical • Axial ratio: • Axial ratio between 1 ( = 00) and 0.62 ( = 900) • Model most likely oversimplified, but interesting to investigate consequences • We can force circular beams by setting for all  (McKinnon 1993)

  10. Model: detection condition • We can check with the following conditions if the beams intersect the line of sight: • We keep picking new ’s and ’s until at least one beam is detected

  11. No alignment and circular beams • IP fraction: 4.4% (observed: < 1.8%) • There are too many fast IP pulsars • W  P -1/2 Model fails

  12. No alignment and elliptical beams • IP fraction: 2.3% (observed: < 1.8%) • There are too many fast IP pulsars • W  P -1/2 Model fails

  13. Alignment of the magnetic axis • IP fraction 1.8% (for align = 70 Myr) • P distribution fits • W  P -0.4 • Elliptical beams: - align = 2 Gyr - P distribution no longer fits data

  14. Implications of alignment Orthogonal (young) • Beaming fraction = fraction of the celestial sphere illuminated by the pulsar = probability to see the pulsar • Older pulsars are less likely to be found in a pulsar survey • Average beaming fraction is 8% instead of 17% inferred total population of pulsars is 2x larger Aligned (old)

  15. Implications for spin-down • Braking torque can change  • Braking torque depends on  • Characteristic age, B, Edot etc. is a function of  • Vacuum dipole: Edot  sin2 • Why timescale so slow?

  16. Conclusions • IP population suggests thatalign = 7x107 yr • Consistent with align found by Tauris & Manchester • The model is simple and intuitive. No ad-hoc assumptions are required. • Different  - P relations without alignment is not able to fit the data • Elliptical beams are inconsistent with the data • Older pulsars are more difficult to find and total inferred population is 2x larger • Standard spin-down formula is questionable

  17. What can LOFAR/SKA do? • Find many more pulsars. • Constrain beam shapes • Constrain functional forms  evolution • Better understanding braking torques • Comparison of the high and low frequency IP populations provides information about frequency dependence of pulsar beams.

More Related