1 / 8

Fermat’s Theorem on Sums of Squares

Fermat’s Theorem on Sums of Squares. Mark Sullivan Advisor: Karl Zimmermann Union College. Let be an integral domain equipped with a multiplicative identity element . Definition An element is a unit in provided that such that . Suppose that is neither nor a unit in .

yetty
Download Presentation

Fermat’s Theorem on Sums of Squares

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fermat’s Theorem on Sums of Squares Mark Sullivan Advisor: Karl Zimmermann Union College

  2. Let be an integral domain equipped with a multiplicative identity element . Definition An element is a unit in provided that such that . Suppose that is neither nor a unit in . Definition The element is prime provided that , implies that or . Definition The element is irreducible provided that implies that is a unit or is a unit.

  3. The Gaussian Integers: Norm: One can show that the norm serves as an appropriate Euclidean norm; the Gaussian integers are a Euclidean Domain. One can show that if and only if is a unit in the Gaussian integers. One can show that .

  4. Theorem (Fermat) Let be an odd prime number. Then if and only if for some Proof: Assume that for some We know that or , since is an odd prime. For contradiction, let Then for some Thus, either (working modulo ): Case 1: One of and is congruent to ; the other is congruent to . Case 2: One of and is congruent to ; the other is congruent to . However, for any , if is odd, then , and if is even, then . Thus, Cases 1 and 2 are both impossible; by contradiction,

  5. Lemma 1If an odd prime number is such that , then divides for some . Proof: Let . Then is divisible by . Then the order of the group of units of the quotient ring, is divisible by 4. But is cyclic, since is a prime. Then contains some cyclic subgroup of order 4. Thus, such that In that case, , so , hence . Therefore, Since is prime, , meaning , or , meaning . This implies that divides .

  6. Lemma 2 If a prime number is reducible in , then for some Proof: Let be reducible in . Then , neither being units, with . In that case, . Since is a Euclidean Domain, it is a Unique Factorization domain, so this representation is unique. Therefore, either one of and is equal to and the other is equal to , or else both are equal to . Thus, . However, for some , so . This indicates that .

  7. Theorem (Fermat) Let be an odd prime number. Then if and only if for some Assume Lemma 1: If an odd prime number is such that , then divides the integer for some . Then by Lemma 1, for some . Therefore in . Assume for contradiction that is irreducible in . However, is a Unique Factorization Domain, and so all irreducibles in are also primes in , and so is a prime in . Thus, or in . But then, for some , Therefore . The contradiction implies that is reducible in in . Lemma 2: If a prime number is reducible in , then for some Therefore, by Lemma 2, for some

  8. Bibliography • D. S. Dummit and R. M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, 2004.

More Related