1 / 36

Biological Influences on Personality

Biological Influences on Personality. Major Point. Many individual differences in personality are rooted in biology introversion vs. extraversion impulsivity sensation-seeking morningness vs. eveningness vulnerability to positive vs. negative emotions

Audrey
Download Presentation

Biological Influences on Personality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Biological Influences on Personality

  2. Major Point • Many individual differences in personality are rooted in biology • introversion vs. extraversion • impulsivity • sensation-seeking • morningness vs. eveningness • vulnerability to positive vs. negative emotions • inhibited or “high reactive” temperament among infants

  3. 1. Extraversion-Introversion • arousal level • influenced both by environmental factors and ascending reticular activating system in brain • ARAS regulates level of cortical arousal • there is some optimal level of arousal

  4. Brain Stem • ARAS: ascending reticular activating system

  5. Eysenck’s Arousal Theory • Introverts have higher baseline levels of cortical arousal. • Seek out less stimulating environments. • Extraverts have lower baseline levels of arousal. • Seek out more stimulating environments. • Seeking out or avoiding of social situations is a strategy for maintaining optimal level of arousal.

  6. Evidence • Geen (1984) • Method • Subjects were asked to choose preferred level of background noise while working on a paired-associates learning task. • subjects’ SCRs were monitored • Results • Introverts chose noise levels substantially lower than extraverts • Each group performed best (took shorter amount of time) at preferred noise level • Introverts and extraverts had just about same number of SCRs at preferred level of noise.

  7. Revision of Theory • most recent evidence suggests that extraverts and introverts don’t differ in baseline levels of arousal • real difference lies in their arousability (arousal response)

  8. 2. Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment • Gray (1990) • developed theory of personality based on research with animals • many differences in behavior are governed by 2 systems in brain

  9. Separate Systems • BAS (behavioral activation system) • responsive to incentives (cues for reward) • regulates approach behavior • BIS (behavioral inhibition system) • responsive to cues for punishment, frustration, and uncertainty • inhibits behavior, brings about avoidance behavior

  10. Gray’s Theory • People differ regarding relative sensitivity of BAS and BIS • person with reactive BIS • especially sensitive to cues of punishment, frustration, and novelty • vulnerable to unpleasant emotions (anxiety, fear, sadness) • sensitive BIS leads to anxiety, neuroticism • person with reactive BAS • especially sensitive to reward • vulnerable to positive emotions; tends to approach stimuli • sensitive BAS leads to impulsivity

  11. Evidence • Typical study • impulsive subjects play game of chance • subjects are either punished for wrong response or rewarded for correct response • result: subjects learn more slowly when punished for wrong response than when rewarded for correct response

  12. Evidence (continued) • Larsen & Ketelaar (1991) • asked extraverted and introverted subjects to imagine being in positive situations and neutral situations • afterwards, rated mood • found that extraverts rated mood as more positive than introverts after positive condition • no differences in neutral condition

  13. 3. Sensation-Seeking • tendency to seek out thrilling and exciting activities, to take risks, and avoid boredom

  14. Typical Items • I sometimes like to do things that are a little frightening (T) • A sensible person avoids activities that are dangerous (F) • I like to have new and exciting experiences and sensations, even if they are frightening, unconventional, or illegal (T) • Almost everything enjoyable is illegal or immoral (T) • I get bored seeing the same old faces (T) • I like the comfortable familiarity of everyday friends (F)

  15. Evidence • high scorers include • skydivers, police officers who volunteer for riot duty, college students who volunteer for unusual studies (drugs, ESP, hypnosis) • gambling • make riskier bets • sexuality: • larger # of partners, wider variety of sex acts

  16. Sensation-Seeking and MAO • MAO = monoamine oxidase • breaks down many neurotransmitters • serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine • high sensation seekers have low levels of MAO in bloodstream • low MAO means less inhibition

  17. 4. Morningness and Eveningness • preference for being active and doing important/demanding work earlier vs. later in the day • rooted in length of person’s biological circadian temperature rhythm • morningness: peak body temp (most alert) early in day • eveningness: peak body temp late in day

  18. 5. Hemispheric Asymmetry and Affective Style • Background • left hemisphere is more active when person is experiencing pleasant emotions • right hemisphere is more active when person is experiencing unpleasant emotions

  19. Typical Finding • Davidson et al. (1990) • Method • showed film clips designed to either amuse or disgust • videotaped subjects and recorded EEG data • Results • when participants were smiling at amusing film, had more activation in left frontal lobe • when participants were showing facial expressions of disgust at disgusting film, had more activation in right frontal lobe

  20. Theory • baseline EEG asymmetry indicates vulnerability to pleasant or unpleasant emotional states • more activity in left side = positive emotions • more activity in right side = negative emotions

  21. Evidence • Tomarken et al. (1990) • Method • measured EEG while subjects were resting • showed subjects either happy or disgusting/fearful films • asked subjects to rate how films made them feel • Results • found frontal asymmetry measures taken before film clip predicted subsequent emotional reaction to film • participants with right-sided activation reported more intense negative reactions to film • participants with left-sided activation reported more intense positive reactions to film

  22. Evidence • EEG asymmetry is evident during infancy • study of 10-month old infants • mothers left room • some cried; some did not • criers exhibited more right-sided activation • test-retest data suggest EEG asymmetry is stable among infants and adults

  23. Are you right-sided or left-sided asymmetric? • Characteristic level of right- or left-sided activation may be indicated by direction person’s eyes drift when he/she concentrates on answering a difficult question • eyes drifting toward right = left-sided activation • eyes drifting toward left = right-sided activation

  24. 6. Temperament in Childhood • infants differ in activity level, mood, responsiveness, soothability, and attention span • some are irritable and cranky; others are calm and sweet-natured • some squirm and fidget; others cuddle up in adult’s arms and snuggle • some fuss and cry; others smile easily • temperament: • characteristic emotional tone of infant • disposition to respond to the environment in relatively stable, typical ways

  25. Evidence • Kagan (1994, 1998) • studies temperamental styles which he calls “reactive” and “nonreactive” • about 20% of children are at one extreme or the other

  26. Kagan’s research • Kagan’s research shows longitudinal stability • study of highly reactive infants • 4 mos: excitable, nervous, overreact to little things • 14 and 21 mos: wary and fearful of new things (toys that make noise, odd-looking robots) even if mom in room • 5 years: timid and uncomfortable in new situations • 7 years: show sx of anxiety (afraid of being kidnapped, need to sleep with light on)

  27. Biological Basis of Inhibition • inhibited children have lower threshold for activation of limbic system circuits that produce sympathetic arousal • Sympathetic arousal of 5.5-year-olds was correlated with behavioral indices of inhibition at 21-months (.70) and 7.5 years (.64).

  28. Environment and Biology in Attachment • attachment: quality of emotional bond between infants and caregiver • assess attachment via strange situation • child put in room with unfamiliar objects • stranger comes into room • mother leaves • after short period of time, mother returns

  29. Attachment Categories • securely attached (62%) • explore room while mother is present • don’t seem overly fearful of stranger • although show distress when mother leaves, they display signs of comfort and pleasure when she returns • avoidant (23%) • do not appear upset by new situation • ignore mother while present, indifferent to her absence • don’t seek her comfort when she returns

  30. Attachment categories (continued) • anxious/ambivalent (15%) • do not explore room and remain close to mother • get very distressed when she leaves, continue to express distress when she returns • may express anger toward mother when she returns • avoidant and anxious/ambivalent are called “insecurely attached”

  31. Van den Boom’s (1989) longitudinal study • Method • Infants assessed at 10-15 days • 17% classified as irritable • observed interaction of infants and mothers (and matched nonirritable control group) 2x per month for next 6 months • at 1 year, brought children into lab for strange situation

  32. Van den Boom (1989) continued • Results • Mothers of irritable infants were more likely to ignore babies and show poor soothing skills and inconsistent responses over next 6 months. • Irritable infants were more likely to be categorized as insecurely attached at 1 year. • Question • What causes poor attachment? Infants’ biology or responses of caregivers?

  33. Intervention Study • Mothers of irritable babies given training • interact sensitively • soothe babies • be aware of signals • play with babies • Results • control group: 68% insecurely attached • treatment group: 28% insecurely attached

  34. Summary • introversion vs. extraversion • differences in arousability • impulsivity • sensitivity to reward (BAS) • sensation-seeking • low levels of MAO

  35. Summary (continued) • morningness vs. eveningness • differences in circadian temperature rhythms • vulnerability to negative vs. positive emotions • differences in hemispheric asymmetry (right = negative)

  36. Summary (continued) • inhibited or “high reactive” temperament among infants • differences in SNS activation • fearful behavior throughout childhood • difficult temperament may affect quality of attachment by influencing behavior of caregivers

More Related