1 / 24

Federal Legislative History Christopher S. O’Byrne M.L.I.S. Candidate in Law Librarianship University of Washington Inf

Federal Legislative History Christopher S. O’Byrne M.L.I.S. Candidate in Law Librarianship University of Washington Information School June 28, 2006. What Is Legislative History?

Gabriel
Download Presentation

Federal Legislative History Christopher S. O’Byrne M.L.I.S. Candidate in Law Librarianship University of Washington Inf

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federal Legislative History Christopher S. O’Byrne M.L.I.S. Candidate in Law Librarianship University of Washington Information School June 28, 2006

  2. What Is Legislative History? • Why and How To Use Legislative History? • Concerns About Using Legislative History • Conclusion

  3. 1.What Is Legislative History? • Documents from the legislative process http://www.nd.edu/~lawlib/students/guides/fedleghist.pdf

  4. For an overview of the legislative process, visit http://bensguide.gpo.gov/6-8/lawmaking/index.html

  5. Or… the 67 page version http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/howourlawsaremade.pdf

  6. Different versions of a bill can be helpful in determining intent

  7. Testimony of experts and interested parties

  8. Published in the Congressional Record

  9. Generally considered to be the most authoritative source

  10. 2. Why and How to Use Legislative History • Steven Breyer, “On the Uses of Legislative History in Interpreting Statutes” • 65 S. Cal. L. Rev. 845 • 5 situations for using legislative history

  11. [Correcting A Legislative] Drafting ErrorUnited States v. Falvey, 676 F.2d 871 (1st Cir. 1982) • Federal law makes it a crime to possess “any …counterfeit coins” • ALL coins? • Or just U.S. currency? • No one in Congress intended to protect foreign or collectible currency

  12. In Sum • Statutes are not always clear • Research may reveal legislative intent • Or provide support for your argument

  13. 3. Concerns About Using Legislative History • Potential for manipulation • Many times floor speakers are addressing only a few other members of Congress • …or an empty room • Comments can be entered into the record in written form • “Bulleting reform” is illusory • Potential to disrupt the Consitutional balance of power

  14. Congressional Concerns Reports are not a product of Congress as a whole Committees, sub-committees, and two-house conferences Reports lack the holistic intent of Congress Unrepresentative materials may be accepted as authoritative

  15. Bills go unread • 1989 Budget Reconciliation Act • Thousands of unnumbered pages tied together with rope “While reading it was obviously out of the question, it's true that I was permitted to walk around the box and gaze upon it from several angles, and even to touch it.” Rep. Christopher Cox

  16. Judicial Concerns • Selective citation to advance policy agendas • A.K.A. “Judicial Activism”

  17. “[Using legislative history is like] entering a crowded cocktail party and looking over the heads of the guests for one's friends.” • It is often said that one generally finds in the legislative history only that for which one is looking Judge Harold Leventhal

  18. Executive Concerns • Minimizes or ignores the role of the Executive • President passes upon legislation without the benefit of legislative history

  19. 4. Conclusion • What’s the alternative? • Plain Meaning • Textualism • False appearances of objectivity? A court cannot interpret a statute …in the absence of context. The only question is whether it will rely on a context secretly supplied from the judge's own intellect, or will use and acknowledge openly the context supplied by Congressional documents. Prof. Gregory Maggs

  20. Looking Ahead: Next Class • Compiling a Legislative History • Print sources • Electronic sources • And even better… …finding Legislative Histories that someone else has already compiled!

  21. THE END!

  22. “The determination of when deference to legislative policy judgments goes too far and becomes abdication of the judicial responsibility, and when scrutiny of those judgments goes too far on the part of the judges and becomes what I think is properly called judicial activism” S. HRG. 108–135: CONFIRMATION HEARINGS ON FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE Chief Justice John Roberts

  23. “[S]ometimes when a case of statutory interpretation comes before a court and your first look at the statute seems to produce an absurd result, let's say, or a very unjust result, then I think the judiciary has the obligation to go back and say, ‘Well, is this really what the statute means?’” S. HRG. 109-277: CONFIRMATION HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF SAMUEL A. ALITO, JR. TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Justice Samuel Alito

More Related