340 likes | 799 Views
Please Fasten Safety Belts Prior to Take Off. Outline. Basic models of drug behaviorApplication of drug models: target controlled drug deliveryModels of drug interactionAre mathematical models of drug behavior clinically predictive?Future Directions. I won't be discussing. Individual drug pharmacokineticsThe role of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in anesthetic drug developmentSpecific mathematical functions, other than some fundamental definitions.
E N D
1. Models of Drug Behavior
2. Please Fasten Safety BeltsPrior to Take Off
3. Outline Basic models of drug behavior
Application of drug models: target controlled drug delivery
Models of drug interaction
Are mathematical models of drug behavior clinically predictive?
Future Directions
4. I won’t be discussing Individual drug pharmacokinetics
The role of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in anesthetic drug development
Specific mathematical functions, other than some fundamental definitions
5. Basic Models of Drug Behavior
6. Simple Pharmacokinetic Model: Volume of Distribution
7. Simple Pharmacokinetic Model: Clearance
8. The time required for drug concentrations to decrease by 50%.
Simple Pharmacokinetic Model: Half-Life
9. Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Duzitol
11. More complex PK Model:Multi-compartment
12. More complex PK Model:Multi-compartment
13. Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Duzitol
14. Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Duzitol
16. Opioid Half-Lives (minutes)
17. Opioid Pharmacokinetics
18. Integrative PK model:Context-Sensitive Half-Time
19. PK/PD Concept:20% Plasma Decrement Time
20. PK/PD Concept:80% Decrement Time
22. Awake EEG
23. Profound Opioid EEG Effect
24. EEG Time Course with Fentanyl
25. EEG Time Course with Alfentanil
26. Extended PK/PD Concept: The “Effect Site”
27. Normalized Effect Site Opioid Concentrations
28. Morphine Onset
29. Simulation of MorphineTime Course
30. Morphine Pharmacokinetics
31. Morphine vs. Fentanyl PK
32. Morphine vs. Fentanyl PK
33. Morphine vs. Fentanyl Onset
34. Morphine vs. Fentanyl Onset
35. Morphine vs. Fentanyl PK
36. Comparative Hydromorphone PK
37. Comparative Hydromorphone PK
38. Hydromorphone Onset
39. Hydromorphone Onset
40. Comparative Hydromorphone PK
41. Comparative Sufentanil PK
42. Comparative Sufentanil PK
43. Sufentanil Onset
44. Sufentanil Onset
45. Meperidine Onset
46. Meperidine Onset
47. Comparative Onset ofAlfentanil and Remifentanil
48. Methadone Onset
49. Methadone Onset
50. Methadone PK
51. Methadone PK
52. Application of Drug Models:Target Controlled Delivery
53. Fentanyl: Target = 1 ng/ml
54. Fentanyl TCI
55. Fentanyl TCIPlasma Target
56. Fentanyl TCIEffect Site Target
57. Remifentanil: Plasma Control
58. Remifentanil: Effect Site Control
60. Propofol: Plasma Control
61. Propofol: Effect Site Control
65. Target Controlled Lidocaine Used at Stanford Pain Clinical for patients with neuropathic pain.
66. CSF Targeted Epidural Clonidine
67. Models of Drug Interaction
70. Propofol/Alfentanil Interaction Adapted from Vuyk et al, Anesthesiology 83:8-22, 1995
Characterizes the concentrations for
intubation
maintenance
on emergence
Concentrations are 50% response level
75. Usually interactions are represented in two dimensions
76. However, they are 3D surfaces:(same model as on prior slide)
83. Midazolam, Propofol, Alfentanil Interaction 400 patients undergoing gynecological surgery
Dose response relationships established for loss of response to verbal command
All drugs tested singly, in paired combinations, and the triple drug combination.
91. Propofol-RemifentanilInteraction Surface: Laryngoscopy
92. Propofol-RemifentanilInteraction Surface: BIS
93. Dynamic Ventilatory Control
94. Model of Ventilatory DepressionRemifentanil 70 µg bolus
95. Model of Ventilatory DepressionRemifentanil 12 µg/min infusion
96. Are Drug Models Predictiveof Drug Effect?
97. The Aspect Data Base Patient trials (movement):
Thiopental
Propofol
Fentanyl/Alfentanil/Sufentanil
Isoflurane
Nitrous Oxide
Volunteer trials (recall, sedation, eyelash):
Propofol
Isoflurane
Alfentanil
Midazolam
98. The Aspect Data Base Aspect Investigators:
Peter Sebel (Emory)
Peter Glass (Duke)
Carl Rosow (Harvard/MGH)
Lee Kearse (Harvard/MGH)
Marc Bloom (University of Pittsburgh)
Ira Rampil (University of California, San Francisco)
Randy Cork (University of Arizona)
Mark Jopling (Ohio State University)
N. Ty Smith (University of California, San Diego)
Paul White (University of Texas at Dallas)
99. Recall vs. Heart Rate, Blood Pressure(unstimulated)
100. Recall vs. BIS, Blood Pressure(unstimulated)
101. Recall vs. BIS, Blood Pressure(unstimulated)
102. Predictors of Movement
105. PK for AAI, BIS, and Predicted Propofol Concentrations(when combined with remifentanil)
106. Propofol-Remifentanil Interaction(loss of response to laryngoscopy)
107. Are drug models predictive? Mathematical models of drug behavior incorporating effect site concentrations and drug interactions predict anesthetic drug effect (e.g., loss of response to stimulation) as well as:
Measured concentrations
BIS
AAI
I am aware of only one counter example, which has not been published.
108. Models of Drug Behavior:Future Directions
109. Jan Hendrickx Interaction AnalysisLiterature search All interaction studies involving 2 or more drugs:
GABA propofol, etomidate, methohexital, thiopental, midazolam, diazepam
NMDA ketamine
Alpha2 clonidine, dexmedetomidine
Opioids morphine, alfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, remifentanil
Dopamine droperidol
Na+ channel lidocaine
110. Endpoints considered Humans
Hypnosis Verbal/Syringe
Pain/Movement Incision/Tetanus
Animals
Hypnosis Righting reflex
Pain/Movement Tail clamp/Tetanus
113. Results
114. Conclusion Additivity usually applies when anesthetics act identically at a single site
additivity supports, but does not prove, a single site of action.
Additivity is the exception for the interaction of intravenous drugs that are known to target different receptors relevant to the anesthetic state.
115. What are the implications for the mechanisms of action of inhaled anesthetics?What do we learn from existing interaction data with inhaled anesthetics, and what future research can be done?
119. Different AnestheticsAct at Different Receptors
120. STRICTLY ADDITIVE INTERACTIONS
121. Conclusion For years, we have pursued protein based mechanisms of anesthetic action, focused on ion channels
No single ion channel can explain the inhaled anesthetic action
It has been postulated that multiple discrepant effects on proteins may be responsible for inhaled anesthetic action.
STRICT ADDITIVITY has pushed us back to a unitary site of inhaled anesthetic action.