The framework for monitoring in 2009/10

1. The framework for monitoring in 2009/10 Dr Meriel Hutton Interim Head of Quality Assurance

2. Principles of Good Regulation • Proportionality • Accountability • Consistency • Transparency • Targeting

3. AchievementsinYear3 • Evidence of continuing enhancement • Earned autonomy process • Better understanding of risk control

4. Colour coded results from the Institutions which earned autonomy for next year showing 07/08 result where different from 08/09

5. Earned Autonomy • Format of report • Poor compliance with a summary of findings issues for future monitoring, sources of evidence • Majority evaluative statements supported by evidence

6. Key Risks 2009/10 • Resources • Admissions and Progression • Practice Learning • Fitness for Practice • Quality Assurance

7. Targeted issues for monitoring in Year 4 • Compliance with standards to support learning and assessment in practice (SLAiP)– now mandatory • Approval processes in our providers’ Institutions • Adherence to EU requirements for programmes of preparation for general nurses Eg length of programme /hours of practice content

8. Clinical focus • Pre-registration nursing programmes Including shortened and accelerated programmes • SCPHN • Endorsed programmes • others not previously monitored • Supervisor of midwives • Small selection of pre-registration midwives

9. Results by provider 23 4 55 2 • Providers with ALL good or outstanding grades have earned autonomy (EA) status - self-reporting and no visit • Providers with mainly good or outstanding grades but one satisfactory grade due to a single specific issue - self reporting with 1 day focused visit • Providers with a mixture of grades and those with EA status last year will get the normal 2 day visit • Providers with a number of satisfactory or unsatisfactory grades over the past 2 years of monitoring - 3 day visit

10. Earned autonomy 2009/10 ENGLAND cont. Lincoln London South Bank New College Durham Middlesex Sheffield Sheffield Hallam Teesside Winchester Wolverhampton SCOTLAND Edinburgh Queen Margaret ENGLAND Anglia Ruskin Bristol Bolton Central Lancashire Cumbria De Montfort Edge Hill Greenwich Huddersfield Kingston Leeds Leeds Met.

11. Single target visit 2009/10 • Oxford Brookes University • Staffordshire University • University of Hull • University of Wales Institute, Cardiff

12. Normal 2 day visit SCOTLAND Abertay Glasgow Dundee Edinburgh Napier Robert Gordon Stirling UWScotland WALES Bangor Glamorgan Swansea Newport Cardiff University Glyndwr N. IRELAND Beeches NEDC Queens Ulster Liverpool Liverpool John Moores London Met. Manchester Manchester Met. Northampton Northumbria Nottingham Open University Plymouth Reading Salford Southampton Sunderland Surrey UC Suffolk UWEngland Worcester York ENGLAND Birmingham Birmingham City Bedfordshire Bournemouth Bradford Brighton Brunel Buckinghamshire Canterbury Chester City Coventry Derby East Anglia Essex Gloucester Hertfordshire Keele Kings College London

13. Additional visit • Glasgow Caledonian • Thames Valley University

14. Target for 2009/10 Consistency

15. Thank you For more information about the NMC visitwww.nmc-uk.org