1 / 10

Interdisciplinary Research and Education at USC

Interdisciplinary Research and Education at USC. Focus: New areas of science and technology that require research teams Ari Requicha requicha@usc.edu http:www-lmr.usc.edu/~requicha. Why Bother?. Real-world problems do not fall neatly within disciplinary boundaries – industry knows this.

Sophia
Download Presentation

Interdisciplinary Research and Education at USC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interdisciplinary Research and Education at USC Focus: New areas of science and technology that require research teams Ari Requicha requicha@usc.edu http:www-lmr.usc.edu/~requicha

  2. Why Bother? • Real-world problems do not fall neatly within disciplinary boundaries – industry knows this. • Team work is essential in the real world and discouraged in universities. • Exciting areas of big impact, where major advances are taking place – where the action is. • Big, visible grants – where the dollars are.

  3. New Areas • Is it for real or a fad? • Wait and see (timid administration). Then if OK play catch up. • Take an informed risk. Maybe use internal and external advisory groups. • Who are the peers? • Merit/quality judgements. • Tenure decisions. • Should junior people be discouraged from doing this work?

  4. New Interdisciplinary Areas • Grass roots: must be simultaneously recognized as important by several departments (and the administration). • Top down: aggressive administration. • Hiring: in which department(s)? Administration controls the slots.

  5. Depth vs. Breadth • Can’t be an expert in everything. • Must have depth in something. • Goal: Depth in one discipline and knowledge of others to understand problems and to be able to interact with specialists. • Who judges depth/quality? Departments.

  6. Educational Implications • Students should not be “penalized” for choosing interdisciplinary work. • Fulfilling requirements in several disciplines is prohibitive. • Students do not have the pre-requisites for in-depth courses in other disciplines. • Team work is usually discouraged. • University has to accept the goal and • Teach both depth and breadth courses. • To increase breadth need to reduce depth (or increase course length).

  7. University Organization • Areas may come and go; faculty stay. • Matrix organization (used by many in industry). • Degrees: in departments but mention “programs”. Departments “Programs”

  8. Centers/Institutes • Outside visibility. • Fund raising. • Recruiting. • Infrastructure support • Equipment. • Technical and administrative personnel. (Career paths?) • Facilitate interaction • Seminars and other events. • Contiguous space. • Powerful teleconferencing (IMSC; Medical School).

  9. USC Issues (1) • Budgeting for proposals – Wide diversity among schools • RA tuition. • Academic year release. • Overhead rates. • Need for multiple approvals. • Lengthy cost share discussions. • Authority over accounts – split vs. undivided accounts. • Teaching • New courses across departments. • “Breadth” courses are service courses. • Teaching credit. • Tuition credit.

  10. USC Issues (2) • Lack of space • Labs. • “Mingling” areas. • Seminar rooms. • Contiguous space for “program” faculty and students. • Quality of space, e.g. CS building. • Living in the past • Some faculty continue to work on areas that no longer have impact. • Departments tend to keep building up in existing areas. • Reward flexibility. • Who’s addressing all these issues? • The senate is a poor representative of the faculty involved in interdiscipinary activities in science and technology. • Strategic planning ignores science and technology trends.

More Related