40 likes | 57 Views
This document outlines a process for individuals, groups, and standards bodies to influence MPLS and GMPLS standards development. It summarizes SUB-IP WG charters and details a change process. Originator writes Problem Statement ID, WG chairs evaluate it, and REWG sends request to AD. Lots of discussion and satire included.
E N D
MPLS and GMPLS Change Processdraft-anderson-mpls-g-chg-proc-00 Loa Anderson
Overview • Document a process through which individuals, working groups and standards bodies can influence the development of MPLS and GMPLS standards • Summarize charter of several SUB-IP WGs • Detail a change process
Process • Originator writes Problem Statement ID • WG chairs evaluate Problem Statement ID • IESG/IAB appoints Requirement Evaluation WG (REWG) • REWG sends request to AD • WG requests charter update to include problem • WG Process begins
Status • Lots of lively discussion on the list • Some good satire, too ;-) • Topics of discussion • Is this merely a reaffirmation of IETF process? • What is the role of a liaison? • When all approvals are not obtained? Is there any alternative to the dust bin?